Basel III Risk and Stress Testing Training Course

Duration 10 days 17 modules · 65 contact hours
Level Intermediate Certificate on completion
Who attends Risk Managers, Treasury Managers and others
Fee from USD 2,200 KSh 190,000 for Kenyan organisations
Where 52 cities + online See dates by city
Next start 16 Nov 2026 Course code SD-RM-068

Before you join: Participants should understand bank financial statements, core credit concepts and the purpose of regulatory capital.

Dates & prices

Two start dates a month in every city, and live online on weekdays or weekends. Fees are per participant; classroom fees include tuition, materials, lunch and refreshments, and the certificate.

Suggest a date or city

Showing the next six months. Later dates, other cities and private deliveries for your team are available on request.

Course overview

Basel III places risk, capital, liquidity and governance under close supervisory scrutiny. Banks and financial institutions must demonstrate that risk measures are credible, data is traceable, stress scenarios are severe but plausible, and capital plans remain viable under adverse conditions. Weak links between risk appetite, models, regulatory returns and management action can lead to poor capital allocation, supervisory findings and ineffective response during market or credit deterioration.

This course develops the practical skills needed to assess Basel III risk exposures and design stress testing programmes. Participants work through regulatory capital components, risk-weighted assets, liquidity metrics, ICAAP, ILAAP, credit risk, market risk, operational risk and counterparty credit risk. They learn how to translate macroeconomic assumptions into risk parameters, projected losses, capital ratios and management actions. The course also addresses BCBS 239 data principles, model governance, reverse stress testing, recovery planning and senior-management reporting.

Instruction combines concise technical briefings with banking cases, calculation-based analysis, facilitated group work and stress-testing simulations. Participants progressively build a risk and stress-testing pack using risk appetite metrics, scenario assumptions, capital projections, model controls and reporting outputs. The final capstone requires participants to review and present a complete Basel III risk assessment and stress-testing submission for a simulated financial institution.

The course suits professionals working in risk, finance, treasury, credit, compliance, internal audit and regulatory reporting within banks, development finance institutions, insurers with banking-style capital requirements, and financial regulators.

What you will be able to do

  • Assess Basel III capital, liquidity and risk governance requirements against institutional risk exposures
  • Calculate common equity Tier 1, total capital and risk-weighted asset ratios
  • Construct risk appetite statements with quantitative limits, triggers and escalation actions
  • Design macroeconomic stress scenarios using baseline, adverse and severely adverse assumptions
  • Translate stress scenarios into credit losses, capital depletion and liquidity impacts
  • Evaluate ICAAP and ILAAP submissions using material risk, capital and liquidity evidence
  • Apply BCBS 239 principles to risk data aggregation and stress-testing reporting
  • Present a complete Basel III risk assessment and stress-testing pack to senior management

Benefits of attending

For you

  • Ability to interpret Basel III capital and liquidity metrics confidently
  • Practical method for building credible stress-testing scenarios
  • Stronger capability to challenge risk models and assumptions
  • Reusable framework for ICAAP and ILAAP review work
  • Evidence-based approach to senior-management risk reporting

For your organisation

  • Better linkage between risk appetite, capital planning and management actions
  • More defensible stress-testing assumptions and documented scenario design
  • Improved identification of capital, liquidity and concentration vulnerabilities
  • Stronger data governance for regulatory and board risk reporting
  • More consistent challenge of ICAAP, ILAAP and recovery-planning submissions

Course modules

17 modules over 10 days

Participants can explain how Basel III requirements address capital, liquidity and systemic risk.

  • Basel III objectives following capital and liquidity failures during financial crises
  • Pillar 1, Pillar 2 and Pillar 3 requirements compared
  • Minimum standards, national discretion and supervisory review explained
  • Capital, liquidity, leverage and disclosure measures linked to prudential outcomes
  • Systemically important bank buffers and total loss-absorbing capacity introduced
  • Regulatory perimeter, consolidation basis and prudential reporting responsibilities

Participants can assess whether risk governance and appetite arrangements support Basel III compliance.

  • Board, risk committee and senior management accountabilities under Basel governance
  • Three lines model applied to risk ownership and independent challenge
  • Risk appetite statement structure: objectives, metrics, limits and triggers
  • Cascading enterprise appetite limits into business-line risk limits
  • Escalation protocols for appetite breaches, exceptions and remediation actions
  • Risk culture indicators and conduct considerations within prudential governance

Participants can calculate and interpret Basel III capital components and buffer requirements.

  • Common Equity Tier 1 eligibility criteria and prudential deductions
  • Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 instruments distinguished
  • Calculate total capital ratio from capital resources and risk-weighted assets
  • Capital conservation buffer, countercyclical buffer and systemic buffers assessed
  • Transitional arrangements and fully loaded capital positions compared
  • Dividend restrictions and maximum distributable amount implications reviewed

Participants can identify key drivers of credit risk-weighted assets under Basel III.

  • Standardised approach exposure classes and risk weights examined
  • External ratings, collateral and guarantees affecting credit risk weights
  • Internal ratings-based parameters: PD, LGD, EAD and maturity
  • Credit risk mitigation techniques and residual risk considerations
  • Defaulted exposures, provisions and prudential treatment compared
  • Portfolio migration analysis linked to stressed risk-weighted asset projections

Participants can assess market and counterparty exposures relevant to Basel III capital planning.

  • Trading book boundary and banking book classification controls
  • Value-at-Risk, stressed Value-at-Risk and expected shortfall compared
  • Sensitivities-based method for market risk capital introduced
  • Counterparty credit risk exposure measures and netting agreements reviewed
  • Credit valuation adjustment risk and capital consequences explained
  • Wrong-way risk identified within derivatives and collateral arrangements

Participants can incorporate operational and non-financial risks into capital and stress assessments.

  • Basel standardised measurement approach inputs and business indicator components
  • Operational loss event taxonomy and loss data quality controls
  • Risk and control self-assessment linked to operational risk scenarios
  • Cyber risk, conduct risk and third-party risk stress channels
  • Scenario analysis for low-frequency, high-severity operational losses
  • Insurance recoveries, legal risk and management actions evaluated

Participants can assess liquidity resilience using Basel III liquidity and funding metrics.

  • Liquidity Coverage Ratio numerator and denominator calculated
  • High-quality liquid assets eligibility, haircuts and operational constraints
  • Net cash outflows under prescribed thirty-day stress conditions
  • Net Stable Funding Ratio available and required funding factors
  • Contractual maturity mismatch and concentration risk reporting analysed
  • Contingency funding plan triggers, options and governance established

Participants can structure an ICAAP and ILAAP assessment around material risks and evidence.

  • ICAAP purpose, scope and supervisory expectations defined
  • Material risk inventory built using quantitative and qualitative assessment
  • Economic capital, regulatory capital and accounting capital distinguished
  • Multi-year capital plan aligned with strategy and risk appetite
  • ILAAP evidence for liquidity adequacy, funding and intraday risk
  • Management actions tested for feasibility, timing and unintended consequences

Participants can evaluate risk data capabilities needed for reliable stress testing and reporting.

  • BCBS 239 governance, architecture and data ownership principles
  • Data lineage traced from source systems to regulatory risk reports
  • Risk data completeness, accuracy, timeliness and adaptability assessed
  • Reconciliation controls between finance, risk and treasury data implemented
  • Manual adjustments logged, approved and retained for audit evidence
  • Management information dashboards designed for exception and trend reporting

Participants can design a governed stress-testing framework with clear scope and controls.

  • Stress-testing policy defines purpose, scope, frequency and accountability
  • Enterprise-wide, portfolio, sensitivity and reverse tests differentiated
  • Materiality assessment prioritises risks, portfolios and legal entities
  • Scenario severity calibrated against historical evidence and expert judgement
  • Model inventory records methods, owners, limitations and approvals
  • Independent review challenges assumptions, outputs and management responses

Participants can construct coherent macroeconomic scenarios for capital and liquidity stress tests.

  • Baseline, adverse and severely adverse scenarios structured consistently
  • GDP, unemployment, inflation and interest rate paths specified
  • Exchange rates, property prices and commodity shocks incorporated
  • Narrative scenario drivers translated into measurable economic variables
  • Correlation assumptions tested across macroeconomic and financial risk factors
  • Scenario plausibility documented using historical episodes and forward-looking judgement

Participants can project credit losses and capital effects under adverse economic scenarios.

  • Satellite models link macroeconomic variables to default probabilities
  • Transition matrices project rating migration under stressed conditions
  • Stressed PD, LGD and EAD assumptions documented by portfolio
  • Expected credit loss stages and lifetime loss estimates projected
  • Sector, geography and borrower concentration effects analysed
  • Credit loss forecasts reconciled with provisions and capital impacts

Participants can quantify non-credit stress effects on capital, earnings and liquidity.

  • Interest rate shocks projected through earnings and economic value
  • Foreign exchange, spread and equity shocks applied to positions
  • Liquidity runoff assumptions tested by depositor and funding source
  • Collateral calls, margin requirements and liquidity spirals estimated
  • Operational disruption scenarios quantify losses and recovery costs
  • Cross-risk interactions assessed between market, liquidity and credit stresses

Participants can connect stressed credit impairment, profitability and capital projections.

  • IFRS 9 staging criteria and significant increase thresholds reviewed
  • Point-in-time and through-the-cycle risk parameters distinguished
  • Management overlays governed through evidence, approval and monitoring
  • Pre-provision profit forecasts built from income and expense drivers
  • Tax effects, distributions and balance-sheet growth integrated
  • Capital depletion path projected under baseline and adverse scenarios

Participants can identify failure points and credible recovery actions using reverse stress testing.

  • Reverse stress testing starts from breach or failure conditions
  • Failure thresholds defined for capital, liquidity and market confidence
  • Combination scenarios identify events capable of breaching thresholds
  • Recovery indicators, triggers and escalation thresholds aligned
  • Recovery options assessed for capacity, timing and execution risk
  • Wind-down considerations and resolution planning interfaces discussed

Participants can review stress-testing outputs, challenge weaknesses and report decision-relevant results.

  • Model validation tests conceptual soundness, outcomes and implementation accuracy
  • Benchmarking compares model outputs with alternatives and realised performance
  • Sensitivity analysis identifies assumptions driving capital and liquidity results
  • Limitations register documents uncertainty, compensating controls and remediation
  • Board reporting presents vulnerabilities, management actions and decision points
  • Supervisory review evidence organised for traceability and challenge

Participants can build, review and present a complete Basel III risk assessment and stress-testing pack.

  • Define material risks, governance roles and risk appetite metrics
  • Calculate capital, liquidity and risk-weighted asset starting positions
  • Select adverse scenario drivers and document transmission channels
  • Project credit losses, earnings, capital ratios and liquidity gaps
  • Assess management actions, recovery triggers and residual vulnerabilities
  • Present findings, limitations and recommendations to a risk committee

Exercises and examples are adapted to each cohort's sectors and roles.

What you take back to work

  1. Basel III capital adequacy calculation template
  2. Risk appetite statement and limit register
  3. ICAAP and ILAAP assessment checklist
  4. Macroeconomic stress scenario design template
  5. Capital and liquidity stress-testing model
  6. Board risk committee reporting pack

Who should attend

  • Risk Managers — need to connect risk appetite, capital planning and stress-testing results
  • Treasury Managers — need to assess liquidity, funding and capital resilience under stress
  • Credit Risk Managers — need to model portfolio deterioration and expected credit losses
  • Financial Controllers — need to reconcile capital forecasts with financial planning and reporting
  • Internal Auditors — need to test governance, data lineage and model-control arrangements
  • Regulatory Supervisors — need to review institutional capital and stress-testing submissions

Skills and tools covered

Basel III capitalStress test designRisk appetite settingICAAP assessmentLiquidity risk managementRisk data governance

Tools and standards

Basel III framework, BCBS 239, IFRS 9, EBA stress testing guidelines

How the course runs

Training methodology

The course uses short instructor briefings to establish regulatory concepts, followed by banking cases, ratio analysis, facilitated group exercises and stress-testing simulations. Participants apply Basel III methods to portfolio, capital and liquidity data, document assumptions and compare management responses under adverse conditions. Discussion focuses on the judgements supervisors and senior risk committees expect to see: materiality, plausibility, data quality, model limitations and escalation. Each participant develops an application plan relevant to their own institution or supervisory remit.

Requirements and prerequisites

Participants should understand bank financial statements, core credit concepts and the purpose of regulatory capital. Experience in risk management, treasury, finance, credit analysis, internal audit, compliance or regulatory reporting is useful. Participants should be comfortable interpreting ratios, reviewing spreadsheets and discussing portfolio-level risk. Prior exposure to Basel II, Basel III, ICAAP, liquidity management or stress testing is helpful but not essential. Advanced quantitative modelling, programming, econometrics and prior regulatory examination experience are not required.

A typical training day

08:30 – 10:30First session
10:30 – 10:45Refreshment break
10:45 – 12:30Second session
12:30 – 13:30Lunch and networking
13:30 – 15:00Third session
15:00 – 15:15Refreshment break
15:15 – 16:30Workshop and daily review

Live online deliveries follow the same structure in East Africa Time, with shorter screen blocks and longer breaks.

What the fee includes

  • Instruction by a practitioner facilitator
  • Full course workbook and materials
  • Exercise files, templates and case studies
  • Refreshments and lunch on classroom deliveries
  • Certificate of completion
  • Post-course application plan

Frequently asked questions

Participants should understand basic bank financial statements, lending risk and financial ratios. Prior Basel III or stress-testing experience is helpful, but the course introduces the required regulatory concepts before applying them.

Participants should bring a laptop if attending in person, as the course uses spreadsheet-based calculations and structured templates. They may also bring non-confidential examples of their institution's risk appetite metrics, capital plan or stress-testing questions.

The course is designed for professionals in bank risk, treasury, finance, credit, compliance, internal audit and regulatory supervision. It is particularly relevant to staff who prepare, review or challenge ICAAP, ILAAP, capital plans or stress-testing outputs.

General risk courses commonly focus on risk concepts, instruments or individual risk types. This course concentrates on Basel III prudential requirements, capital and liquidity metrics, regulatory stress testing, governance and supervisory evidence.

Participants can use the templates to review risk appetite statements, assess material risks, document scenario assumptions and challenge capital projections. The methods also support preparation for internal risk committees, supervisory reviews and annual planning cycles.

Each training day runs from 08:30 to 16:30 and provides about 6.5 contact hours. The first part of the course establishes capital, liquidity, governance and data foundations; later modules focus on scenario design, projections, validation and the capstone presentation.

Questions about this course?

Ask about dates, fees, group bookings or running it for your team. Our training team replies by email.