Project Appraisal and Investment Analysis Training Course

Duration 10 days 20 modules · 65 contact hours
Level Intermediate Certificate on completion
Who attends Finance Managers, Project Managers and others
Fee from USD 2,200 KSh 190,000 for Kenyan organisations
Where 52 cities + online See dates by city
Next start 9 Nov 2026 Course code SD-FM-081

Before you join: Participants should understand basic financial statements, percentage calculations and spreadsheet formulas.

Dates & prices

Two start dates a month in every city, and live online on weekdays or weekends. Fees are per participant; classroom fees include tuition, materials, lunch and refreshments, and the certificate.

Suggest a date or city

Showing the next six months. Later dates, other cities and private deliveries for your team are available on request.

Course overview

Capital allocation decisions commit scarce funds for years, yet many project proposals mix strategic claims, optimistic demand assumptions and incomplete cash-flow estimates. Finance teams, project sponsors and public-sector planners need a disciplined way to identify worthwhile initiatives, compare alternatives, test uncertainty and defend recommendations to investment committees. Poor appraisal can approve projects that consume cash, miss policy objectives or fail to deliver stated benefits.

This course develops the full project appraisal process, from opportunity identification and policy alignment through market assessment, cost estimation, discounted cash flow analysis, risk modelling and project selection. Participants calculate NPV, IRR, payback and profitability index; construct incremental cash flows; assess financing effects; and distinguish financial appraisal from economic cost-benefit analysis. They use PESTLE, Porter's Five Forces, stakeholder analysis, sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis and Monte Carlo simulation to assess commercial, operational and delivery risks.

Instruction combines focused briefings with worked financial models, sector cases and team-based appraisal decisions. Cases reflect capital projects, service expansion, technology investment and infrastructure proposals relevant to banks, government bodies, NGOs and corporate investment teams. Participants progressively build an investment case during the course, then present a completed appraisal to a simulated review panel. They leave with reusable models, templates and a structured basis for preparing or scrutinising future investment proposals.

The course suits professionals who contribute to project proposals, capital budgeting, investment committees, programme planning or business-case approval. It is particularly useful where decisions must be justified through clear assumptions, auditable analysis and documented treatment of risk.

What you will be able to do

  • Identify investable project opportunities using problem analysis, stakeholder mapping and policy criteria
  • Formulate investment objectives, options and measurable benefit statements for a project concept
  • Build incremental project cash-flow models using capital, operating, tax and working-capital assumptions
  • Calculate NPV, IRR, payback period and profitability index for competing investment options
  • Assess market demand, strategic fit and commercial viability using PESTLE and Porter's Five Forces
  • Test appraisal results through sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis and Monte Carlo simulation
  • Prepare financial and economic cost-benefit analyses with explicit assumptions and discount rates
  • Present a decision-ready project appraisal and investment recommendation to an approval panel

Benefits of attending

For you

  • Produce investment appraisals that withstand finance and management review
  • Calculate and explain NPV, IRR, payback and profitability index results
  • Challenge unsupported revenue, cost, timing and discount-rate assumptions
  • Present risk-adjusted investment recommendations with clear decision criteria
  • Build a portfolio of reusable appraisal models and business-case templates

For your organisation

  • Improve capital allocation through consistent option comparison and financial criteria
  • Reduce approval of projects based on incomplete costs or optimistic benefits
  • Create auditable investment cases for boards, donors and investment committees
  • Expose delivery, market and financing risks before funds are committed
  • Prioritise projects that support policy objectives and measurable organisational returns

Course modules

20 modules over 10 days

Participants can explain how project appraisal supports disciplined investment decisions.

  • Capital allocation decisions, approval gates and project appraisal purposes
  • Project, programme and portfolio distinctions in investment decision making
  • Financial viability, economic value and strategic fit compared
  • Investment committee roles, delegated authority and decision rights
  • Stage-gate governance from concept screening through post-investment review
  • Common appraisal failures: sunk costs, optimism bias and omitted risks

Participants can define a project opportunity from evidence, needs and root causes.

  • Problem tree analysis distinguishing symptoms, causes and consequences
  • Needs assessment evidence drawn from operational, customer and service data
  • Root-cause analysis using Five Whys and fishbone diagrams
  • Project boundaries, beneficiaries and affected groups clearly specified
  • Baseline conditions documented before proposed intervention design begins
  • Opportunity statements converted into testable project hypotheses

Participants can test whether a proposed project supports policy and strategic priorities.

  • Policy objectives translated into project appraisal criteria
  • Theory of change linking activities, outputs, outcomes and impacts
  • PESTLE analysis identifying external drivers and policy constraints
  • Strategic alignment matrix connecting initiatives to organisational priorities
  • Regulatory, donor and board requirements mapped against project scope
  • Benefit statements linked to measurable strategic performance indicators

Participants can assess stakeholder interests, influence and implementation responsibilities.

  • Stakeholder mapping using power-interest grids and engagement priorities
  • Beneficiary segmentation identifying distinct needs, incentives and access barriers
  • RACI matrix assigning accountability for approval, delivery and benefits
  • Institutional capacity assessed through people, processes, authority and resources
  • Political economy factors affecting project support and implementation decisions
  • Engagement plans addressing resistance, expectations and decision influence

Participants can develop evidence-based demand and market assumptions for a project.

  • Market definition setting product, geography, customer and time boundaries
  • Porter's Five Forces assessing competitive pressure and supplier power
  • Demand forecasting from historical trends, drivers and adoption assumptions
  • Customer willingness-to-pay tested through pricing and affordability analysis
  • Capacity utilisation assumptions reconciled with operational delivery constraints
  • Commercial risks identified from competitors, substitutes and market concentration

Participants can generate feasible alternatives and screen them against agreed criteria.

  • Do-nothing and do-minimum cases established as appraisal baselines
  • Long-list options developed through alternative scope, scale and delivery models
  • Multi-criteria analysis scoring strategic, financial and operational considerations
  • Knockout criteria applied to legal, technical and policy constraints
  • Short-list rationale documenting exclusions and retained project alternatives
  • Options register recording assumptions, dependencies and unresolved questions

Participants can estimate project costs and document their underlying assumptions.

  • Work breakdown structure used to organise capital cost estimates
  • Bottom-up estimating from quantities, unit rates and supplier quotations
  • Operating cost forecasts covering labour, maintenance, utilities and consumables
  • Contingency allowances separated from escalation and management reserves
  • Cost timing aligned with procurement, construction and implementation schedules
  • Assumption register recording sources, owners, confidence and update dates

Participants can construct incremental cash flows for a defined investment option.

  • Incremental cash flows separated from accounting profit and sunk costs
  • Revenue forecasts linked to demand, price, volume and collection timing
  • Working capital requirements calculated from receivables, inventory and payables
  • Tax, depreciation and capital allowances incorporated into project forecasts
  • Terminal value, residual value and decommissioning costs treated explicitly
  • Annual cash-flow model structured with transparent inputs and formulas

Participants can discount project cash flows using defensible rate assumptions.

  • Present value and future value calculations using compounding conventions
  • Nominal and real cash flows matched with consistent discount rates
  • Weighted average cost of capital components and interpretation
  • Risk-adjusted discount rates compared with explicit risk-adjusted cash flows
  • Inflation assumptions separated from real price and volume changes
  • Discount-rate rationale documented for committee review and audit

Participants can calculate and interpret core financial appraisal measures.

  • Net present value calculated from discounted incremental cash flows
  • Internal rate of return interpreted alongside reinvestment assumptions
  • Payback period and discounted payback applied to liquidity concerns
  • Profitability index used when capital budgets constrain project selection
  • Mutually exclusive projects compared using NPV rather than IRR
  • Decision rules documented for accept, reject and defer recommendations

Participants can assess how financing choices affect project feasibility and risk.

  • Equity, debt, grants and concessional finance compared
  • Debt service schedule built from interest, principal and repayment terms
  • Debt service coverage ratio calculated from forecast operating cash flows
  • Funding gaps identified against phased capital expenditure requirements
  • Covenants, security and lender conditions assessed for project implications
  • Financial sustainability tested after grant funding or subsidy expiry

Participants can identify, assess and assign treatment for material project risks.

  • Risk breakdown structure covering strategic, commercial, technical and delivery risks
  • Cause-event-effect statements written for clear risk ownership
  • Probability-impact matrix prioritising risks requiring active treatment
  • Risk register records triggers, owners, responses and residual exposure
  • Risk appetite and tolerance thresholds applied to investment decisions
  • Opportunities distinguished from threats within project risk analysis

Participants can test which assumptions most affect investment viability.

  • One-way sensitivity analysis testing price, volume, cost and timing
  • Two-way sensitivity tables showing combined assumption effects
  • Tornado charts ranking variables by NPV impact
  • Break-even analysis identifying minimum volume, price or utilisation
  • Scenario analysis constructing base, downside and upside cases
  • Management actions linked to early-warning indicators and thresholds

Participants can model uncertainty ranges and interpret probabilistic appraisal results.

  • Probability distributions selected for uncertain project input variables
  • Monte Carlo simulation generating distributions of NPV outcomes
  • Correlation assumptions preventing misleading independent-risk estimates
  • Probability of negative NPV used in risk reporting
  • Percentile outputs interpreted for contingency and decision thresholds
  • Simulation limitations explained without overstating forecast precision

Participants can distinguish economic appraisal from project-level financial analysis.

  • Financial prices converted to economic values using shadow pricing
  • Externalities identified for environmental, social and public-service projects
  • Consumer surplus considered where market prices understate benefits
  • Economic costs separated from transfer payments and financing flows
  • Social discount rates applied under stated public appraisal guidance
  • Economic net present value interpreted alongside financial viability

Participants can incorporate material environmental, social and equity effects into appraisal.

  • Environmental impact pathways linked to project activities and receptors
  • Social impact screening identifies displacement, access and livelihood effects
  • Distributional analysis identifies winners, losers and vulnerable groups
  • Mitigation costs included within financial and economic project models
  • ESG indicators selected for monitoring material non-financial commitments
  • Safeguard requirements translated into appraisal assumptions and conditions

Participants can test whether an appraised project can be delivered as proposed.

  • Logical framework links inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes and indicators
  • Critical path method identifies schedule dependencies and delivery constraints
  • Procurement strategy compares contracting, packaging and market capacity
  • Implementation milestones aligned with funding releases and approval gates
  • Benefits realisation plan assigns measures, owners and review dates
  • Operations readiness assessed before service commencement or asset handover

Participants can rank project proposals under capital, resource and policy constraints.

  • Project ranking combines NPV, strategic scores and risk exposure
  • Capital rationing selects portfolios within fixed investment budgets
  • Resource constraints tested against staffing, procurement and implementation capacity
  • Interdependencies mapped between enabling, dependent and competing projects
  • Portfolio balance considered across return, risk, timing and policy objectives
  • Selection recommendations state trade-offs, deferrals and rejected alternatives

Participants can prepare a clear, auditable investment case for formal approval.

  • Business case structure covering rationale, options, costs, benefits and risks
  • Executive summary presents recommendation, value and critical decision conditions
  • Assumption register reconciled with model inputs and source evidence
  • Independent review questions challenge optimism, bias and missing alternatives
  • Approval papers distinguish decisions required from information provided
  • Post-investment review criteria established before project approval

Participants can build, review and present a complete project appraisal with a supported investment recommendation.

  • Project concept framed through evidence, objectives, stakeholders and strategic alignment
  • Options compared using financial, economic, operational and policy criteria
  • Integrated cash-flow model calculates NPV, IRR, payback and funding needs
  • Risk analysis combines register, sensitivities, scenarios and quantified uncertainty
  • Business case documents assumptions, benefits, implementation plan and governance
  • Investment panel presentation defends recommendation, conditions and next actions

Exercises and examples are adapted to each cohort's sectors and roles.

What you take back to work

  1. Project identification and problem-analysis template
  2. Investment appraisal spreadsheet model
  3. Assumption and risk register
  4. Sensitivity and scenario analysis workbook
  5. Economic cost-benefit analysis template
  6. Investment committee business-case pack

Who should attend

  • Finance Managers — assess capital proposals and challenge investment assumptions
  • Project Managers — develop fundable cases before delivery commitments are made
  • Investment Analysts — compare returns, risks and strategic fit across project options
  • Programme Managers — prioritise initiatives within constrained capital and operating budgets
  • Public-Sector Planners — appraise policy, infrastructure and service-delivery investments
  • Development Finance Officers — assess financially viable projects with measurable development benefits

Skills and tools covered

Project identificationDiscounted cash flowInvestment modellingRisk analysisCost-benefit analysisBusiness case development

Tools and standards

Discounted cash flow (DCF), PESTLE analysis, Porter's Five Forces, Monte Carlo simulation

How the course runs

Training methodology

Short instructor briefings introduce appraisal methods, then participants apply them to realistic investment cases and their own project ideas. Worked spreadsheet examples show how assumptions flow into cash forecasts, valuation metrics and risk tests. Small-group discussions examine competing options, approval criteria and stakeholder concerns. Simulated investment-committee reviews develop challenge and presentation skills. Each participant builds an appraisal progressively, receives structured feedback, and converts course outputs into an application plan for a live or planned project.

Requirements and prerequisites

Participants should understand basic financial statements, percentage calculations and spreadsheet formulas. Experience contributing to budgets, project proposals, business cases, capital requests or programme plans is helpful. Participants should be able to interpret revenue, operating costs, cash flow and simple financial ratios. No prior project appraisal qualification, advanced corporate-finance knowledge, statistical modelling expertise or specialist software certification is required. A laptop with spreadsheet software is recommended for model-building work, although course materials provide the required calculation structures.

A typical training day

08:30 – 10:30First session
10:30 – 10:45Refreshment break
10:45 – 12:30Second session
12:30 – 13:30Lunch and networking
13:30 – 15:00Third session
15:00 – 15:15Refreshment break
15:15 – 16:30Workshop and daily review

Live online deliveries follow the same structure in East Africa Time, with shorter screen blocks and longer breaks.

What the fee includes

  • Instruction by a practitioner facilitator
  • Full course workbook and materials
  • Exercise files, templates and case studies
  • Refreshments and lunch on classroom deliveries
  • Certificate of completion
  • Post-course application plan

Frequently asked questions

Participants need basic familiarity with budgets, cash flow and spreadsheet formulas. The course explains appraisal methods from first principles, but it moves quickly into applied modelling rather than basic bookkeeping.

A laptop with spreadsheet software is recommended because participants work with cash-flow models and risk-analysis templates. Bringing a current or planned project proposal is useful, subject to any confidentiality requirements.

It suits finance staff, project managers, investment analysts, programme managers and planners who prepare, review or approve project proposals. It is relevant to commercial investments, public infrastructure, donor-funded programmes and service-expansion initiatives.

Corporate finance courses commonly focus on company valuation, capital structure and financial markets, while project management courses focus on delivery controls. This course concentrates on deciding whether a specific project should proceed, which option offers best value, and what conditions should govern approval.

Participants can use the cash-flow model, option-screening matrix, risk register and business-case structure for live proposals. The methods also help reviewers challenge assumptions, compare alternatives and request missing evidence before approval.

Each day runs from 08:30 to 16:30 and provides about 6.5 contact hours. The first part develops identification, options and financial modelling; the later part addresses risk, economic appraisal, selection, governance and a final capstone presentation.

Questions about this course?

Ask about dates, fees, group bookings or running it for your team. Our training team replies by email.