Randomized Controlled Trials for Programme Impact Evaluation Training Course

5 days Monitoring & Evaluation Certificate on completion
Course codeSD-ME-017
Duration5 days
LevelIntermediate
CategoryMonitoring & Evaluation
DeliveryClassroom or live online
LanguageEnglish
CertificateCertificate of completion

Course overview

Programme teams are frequently asked to demonstrate whether a cash transfer, livelihoods package, education intervention, protection service or health campaign caused measurable change—not simply whether participants improved over time. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide a defensible way to establish attribution, but weak treatment allocation, underpowered samples, contamination, missing data and poorly specified outcomes can undermine findings and expose organisations to ethical, operational and reputational risk. This course equips M&E professionals to judge when an RCT is feasible and to commission, manage or conduct one to decision-grade standards.

Participants work through the complete RCT lifecycle for development and humanitarian programmes: developing a theory of change and estimand, defining eligibility and outcomes, selecting individual, cluster or phased randomisation designs, calculating sample size and designing field-ready allocation procedures. They learn intention-to-treat analysis, balance checks, treatment-on-the-treated estimation, attrition analysis, subgroup analysis and transparent reporting. Sessions also address informed consent, safeguarding, trial registration, data protection, spillovers, non-compliance and the practical constraints of evaluating interventions in dynamic field settings.

Teaching combines short technical briefings with worked examples in R, Stata and Excel, using realistic programme datasets and implementation scenarios. Participants design an RCT protocol for a live or proposed intervention, build a randomisation plan, specify a minimum analysis plan and interpret model output for a management audience. They leave with a structured RCT evaluation pack containing a theory of change, outcome matrix, sample-size assumptions, allocation procedure, analysis plan and implementation risk register that can be adapted for their organisation’s next evaluation.

The course is designed for professionals who already work with programme data, evaluations or research partners and need stronger technical control over causal impact evidence.

Course objectives

By the end of this course, participants will be able to:

  • Formulate an RCT evaluation question, estimand and testable theory of change for a programme intervention
  • Select individual, cluster, stratified or phased randomisation designs based on operational and ethical constraints
  • Construct an outcome matrix with primary outcomes, secondary outcomes, measurement timing and data sources
  • Calculate sample-size requirements using effect size, power, intra-cluster correlation and anticipated attrition assumptions
  • Create a reproducible treatment-allocation procedure using random-number generation, blocking and stratification
  • Analyse RCT data using baseline balance checks, intention-to-treat estimates and cluster-robust standard errors
  • Diagnose attrition, non-compliance, spillovers and contamination and specify appropriate mitigation or sensitivity analyses
  • Produce an RCT protocol and minimum analysis plan suitable for ethics review, implementation teams and decision-makers

Benefits of attending

For you

  • Gain the technical language to challenge weak impact-evaluation proposals from consultants, partners or donors
  • Build a portfolio-ready RCT protocol and analysis plan based on a real programme challenge
  • Interpret intention-to-treat, clustering and attrition results without relying solely on external statisticians
  • Increase credibility in roles involving evidence generation, adaptive management and research governance
  • Make informed career progression toward impact evaluation, research management or evidence advisory positions

For your organisation

  • Improve the quality and feasibility of RCT terms of reference, protocols and consultant deliverables
  • Reduce the risk of invalid impact claims caused by biased allocation, low power or inappropriate analysis
  • Align programme operations, beneficiary targeting and data collection with evaluation requirements before rollout
  • Generate clearer evidence for funding decisions, scale-up choices and programme redesign
  • Strengthen ethics, consent, data-protection and safeguarding controls in field research activities

Target competencies

RCT design selectionSample size planningRandomisation proceduresCausal impact analysisAttrition diagnosticsTrial protocol development

Who should attend

  • Monitoring and Evaluation Managers — who need to design or oversee credible impact evaluations across programme portfolios
  • Impact Evaluation Specialists — who require stronger command of trial design, analysis and reporting choices
  • Programme Managers — who must align delivery operations, beneficiary selection and evaluation requirements
  • Research and Learning Officers — who turn programme evidence into usable learning and management decisions
  • Data and Evidence Analysts — who prepare, analyse and quality-assure trial datasets and results
  • Donor-funded Project Directors — who need to assess whether proposed RCTs are feasible, ethical and value for money

Requirements and prerequisites

Participants should have practical experience with programme monitoring, survey data, evaluation studies or research commissioning. The course assumes familiarity with basic statistical concepts: averages, proportions, confidence intervals, hypothesis testing and regression as an idea, though not advanced mathematics. Participants should be able to work with spreadsheets and bring a laptop capable of running R or Stata; guided code and templates are provided. Prior RCT experience, programming fluency, econometrics, power-analysis software and a postgraduate research qualification are not required. Those with no prior exposure to evaluation terminology should review basic results-framework and indicator concepts before attending.

Training methodology

The instructor uses a single development-programme case throughout the week, moving from a livelihoods intervention question to a completed trial design and analysis plan. Short lectures establish the statistical and ethical rationale; guided labs use Excel, R and Stata to randomise units, inspect baseline balance, estimate impacts and test robustness. Small groups resolve field constraints such as village-level delivery, delayed rollout and participant spillovers. Daily peer review links technical choices to implementation realities, and the final session converts each participant’s work into an application plan for a current or forthcoming evaluation.

Course outline

Day 1: Causal questions and RCT design choices

  • Causal attribution, counterfactuals and potential outcomes
  • Theory of change and intervention logic for trial design
  • Estimands: intention-to-treat, treatment-on-the-treated and average treatment effects
  • Eligibility criteria, target populations and unit-of-randomisation decisions
  • Individual, cluster and phased-rollout RCT designs
  • Primary outcomes, secondary outcomes and pre-specification
  • Ethical equipoise, informed consent and safeguarding in programme trials

Workshop: Participants convert a programme theory of change into an RCT evaluation question, estimand, eligibility definition and outcome matrix.

Day 2: Sampling, power and treatment allocation

  • Sampling frames, recruitment pathways and representativeness
  • Minimum detectable effects and statistical power
  • Sample-size calculations for individual randomised trials
  • Design effects and intra-cluster correlation in cluster trials
  • Attrition assumptions and sample inflation strategies
  • Simple, blocked and stratified randomisation
  • Allocation concealment, randomisation logs and audit trails

Workshop: Participants calculate a trial sample size and produce a reproducible blocked, stratified allocation list for a simulated beneficiary roster.

Day 3: Field implementation and data quality

  • Baseline, endline and follow-up measurement schedules
  • Survey instrument design and outcome measurement validity
  • Tracking systems for mobile and displaced populations
  • Treatment fidelity monitoring and implementation indicators
  • Contamination, spillovers and information leakage
  • Data-management plans, identifiers and secure data access
  • Protocol deviations, adverse events and field decision rules

Workshop: Participants develop a field implementation plan that maps enrolment, consent, assignment, service delivery, measurement and risk controls.

Day 4: Estimating and testing programme effects

  • Trial dataset structure, codebooks and analysis-ready files
  • Baseline balance tables and randomisation checks
  • Intention-to-treat estimation using difference in means
  • Regression adjustment with baseline covariates
  • Cluster-robust standard errors and cluster-level analysis
  • Missing outcomes, attrition diagnostics and bounds analysis
  • Non-compliance, instrumental variables and treatment-on-the-treated estimation

Workshop: Participants analyse a simulated RCT dataset in R, Stata or Excel and prepare an impact-results table with interpretation notes.

Day 5: Interpretation, reporting and evaluation governance

  • Subgroup analysis, heterogeneity and multiple-testing risks
  • Effect sizes, confidence intervals and practical significance
  • Sensitivity analysis for alternative specifications
  • Cost and cost-effectiveness measures alongside impact estimates
  • Pre-analysis plans, trial registration and version control
  • CONSORT reporting standards and transparent result communication
  • Using RCT findings for adaptation, scale-up and donor decisions

Workshop: Participants complete and peer-review an RCT evaluation pack comprising a protocol summary, randomisation plan, minimum analysis plan and management briefing.

Tools & standards covered

R, Stata, Microsoft Excel, CONSORT 2010 Statement

A typical training day

08:30 – 10:30First session
10:30 – 10:45Refreshment break
10:45 – 12:30Second session
12:30 – 13:30Lunch and networking
13:30 – 15:00Third session
15:00 – 15:15Refreshment break
15:15 – 16:30Workshop and daily review

Live online deliveries follow the same structure in the East Africa Time zone, with shorter screen blocks and longer breaks.

What the fee includes

  • Instruction by a practitioner facilitator
  • Full course workbook and materials
  • Exercise files, templates and case studies
  • Certificate of completion
  • Refreshments and lunch (classroom deliveries)
  • Post-course application plan
  • Facilitator follow-up on request
  • Group rates from five participants

How you can take this course

Classroom

Scheduled sessions in Nairobi, Mombasa, Kigali, Dar es Salaam, Dubai and Cape Town.

Live online

The same facilitator and materials, delivered live for distributed teams and individuals.

In-house

Delivered privately for your team, at your offices or a venue of your choice, tailored to your context. Request a proposal.

Certification

Participants who complete the full five days receive the Skillset Development Certificate of Completion, stating the course title, course code, dates and delivery format — suitable for professional-development records and employer reimbursement.

Frequently asked questions

You should understand basic concepts such as averages, percentages, confidence intervals and hypothesis tests. The course explains regression-based RCT analysis step by step, so prior econometrics or programming experience is not required.

Yes. Bring a laptop for daily analysis and design exercises. Participants can use R, Stata or Excel; installation guidance and course files are provided before the course.

Yes. Managers and commissioners learn how to assess design choices, sample-size assumptions, randomisation procedures and analysis plans. The technical labs also make it easier to ask precise questions of consultants and research partners.

General M&E courses focus on indicators, logframes, routine monitoring and mixed evaluation methods. This course concentrates on the specific design, implementation and analysis decisions needed to make a randomized trial produce credible causal evidence.

Yes, when random assignment is ethically and operationally feasible. The course addresses phased rollout, cluster randomisation, mobile populations, delivery disruptions, spillovers and practical conditions that may make an RCT unsuitable.

You will leave with an RCT evaluation pack tailored to a programme scenario or your own proposed intervention. It includes an evaluation question, outcome matrix, sample assumptions, allocation procedure, minimum analysis plan and implementation risk register.

Upcoming sessions

  • 21 – 25 Sep 2026
    Dubai · USD 4,500
    Book
  • 21 – 25 Sep 2026
    Kigali · USD 3,500
    Book
  • 28 Sep – 02 Oct 2026
    Nairobi · USD 3,000
    Book
  • 05 – 09 Oct 2026
    Live Online · USD 1,500
    Book
  • 12 – 16 Oct 2026
    Cape Town · USD 4,200
    Book
  • 19 – 23 Oct 2026
    Kigali · USD 3,500
    Book
  • 26 – 30 Oct 2026
    Live Online · USD 1,500
    Book
  • 02 – 06 Nov 2026
    Nairobi · USD 3,000
    Book

49 more dates — ask us.


Group of 5+?

Request in-house delivery or group rates →

Related courses in Monitoring & Evaluation

5 Days Certificate

Performance Monitoring for Grant Managers Training Course

Grant managers are expected to show whether funded activities are reaching agreed populations, delivering outputs on time, and contributing …

5 Days Certificate

Realist Evaluation Methodology for Development Programmes Training Course

Development and humanitarian programmes often produce mixed results: a cash intervention improves food security for some households but not …

5 Days Certificate

OECD DAC Criteria for Development Evaluation Training Course

Development and humanitarian organisations are increasingly required to show not only what they delivered, but whether interventions were re…

5 Days Certificate

Field Data Verification for Project Coordinators Training Course

Project coordinators are often responsible for confirming that monitoring data from field teams, partners, community volunteers, and service…