Renewable Energy Solutions Training Course

Participants can compare renewable technologies against a defined project requirement.

• Solar photovoltaic systems compared by scale, mounting, output, and constraints
• Wind turbine projects assessed through wind regime, terrain, setbacks, and access
• Bioenergy pathways distinguished by feedstock, conversion technology, and supply security
• Hydropower and geothermal options screened against resource and permitting conditions
• Technology selection matrix scores cost, yield, maturity, impacts, and reliability
• Hybrid generation combinations matched to operational demand and grid availability

Participants can prepare an energy baseline suitable for renewable project screening.

• Twelve-month utility bills converted into consumption, demand, tariff, and cost data
• Interval meter data analysed for daily, weekly, and seasonal load patterns
• Energy-use intensity calculated per floor area, production unit, or service output
• Load inventory identifies critical equipment, operating hours, and backup requirements
• Baseline adjustments account for weather, occupancy, production, and planned expansion
• Data-quality checks identify missing intervals, estimated readings, and unusual consumption

Participants can estimate preliminary solar PV output from resource and site information.

• Global horizontal irradiance converted into plane-of-array solar resource estimates
• PVGIS and meteorological datasets compared for resource-data uncertainty
• Shading analysis identifies obstruction losses from buildings, trees, and terrain
• Performance ratio separates irradiation, temperature, soiling, inverter, and cable losses
• Module orientation and tilt tested against annual yield and load timing
• Preliminary PV yield expressed in kilowatt-hours per kilowatt-peak annually

Participants can judge whether a wind opportunity merits further technical investigation.

• Wind-speed distributions represented using Weibull parameters and measurement records
• Hub-height extrapolation applies wind-shear assumptions to measured site data
• Turbine power curves translate wind speeds into expected annual generation
• Wake losses estimated from turbine spacing, prevailing winds, and terrain
• Capacity factor tested against resource quality, curtailment, and availability assumptions
• Setback, aviation, noise, and visual constraints recorded during initial screening

Participants can screen dispatchable renewable technologies using resource and operational criteria.

• Feedstock assessment covers quantity, seasonality, moisture, competing uses, and transport
• Anaerobic digestion matched to organic waste composition and digestate management
• Biomass combustion evaluated through fuel quality, emissions controls, and storage
• Small hydropower screening considers head, flow duration, abstraction, and ecology
• Geothermal resource concepts distinguish shallow heat, direct use, and power generation
• Dispatchable renewable output valued against thermal fuel displacement and reliability needs

Participants can identify storage roles and size preliminary hybrid-system configurations.

• Battery storage applications separated into shifting, backup, peak shaving, and balancing
• Lithium-ion battery specifications compared using capacity, power, cycles, and degradation
• State-of-charge profiles tested against generation variability and critical-load requirements
• Round-trip efficiency and depth-of-discharge incorporated into usable storage calculations
• Hybrid solar, battery, diesel configurations modelled for remote and weak-grid sites
• Battery safety requirements address thermal management, fire protection, and access control

Participants can identify grid connection requirements and likely integration constraints.

• Interconnection studies examine voltage limits, fault levels, protection, and hosting capacity
• Net metering, net billing, and feed-in tariffs compared for project revenues
• Inverter functions support voltage ride-through, reactive power, and frequency response
• Curtailment risk assessed from grid congestion, dispatch rules, and generation timing
• Power-quality issues include harmonics, flicker, voltage imbalance, and transients
• Single-line diagrams communicate generation, metering, protection, and connection interfaces

Participants can conduct a preliminary site-screening assessment for renewable development.

• Site-screening checklist records land tenure, access, slope, drainage, and security
• GIS mapping identifies exclusions, easements, protected areas, and nearby infrastructure
• Grid-connection proximity assessed against route length, voltage level, and upgrade costs
• Planning permits sequenced with environmental approvals, licences, and stakeholder consultation
• Land agreements distinguish lease, easement, purchase, concession, and community benefit
• Fatal-flaw analysis prioritises constraints requiring resolution before development expenditure

Participants can identify and manage major environmental and social issues in renewable projects.

• Environmental and social impact assessment scopes receptors, pathways, impacts, and mitigation
• IFC Performance Standards applied to land use, labour, biodiversity, and communities
• Biodiversity screening addresses habitat loss, bird collision, bats, and protected species
• Stakeholder engagement plan maps affected groups, concerns, communication, and grievance channels
• Construction management controls dust, noise, traffic, waste, and erosion
• Decommissioning provisions address asset removal, land restoration, recycling, and financial security

Participants can prepare a preliminary financial appraisal for a renewable energy project.

• Capital expenditure separates equipment, civil works, development, connection, and contingency
• Operating expenditure estimates maintenance, insurance, land rent, administration, and replacement
• Levelized Cost of Energy calculates lifetime cost per generated kilowatt-hour
• Discounted cash flow estimates net present value, internal rate, and payback
• Sensitivity analysis tests irradiation, tariff, capital cost, inflation, and degradation
• Avoided-cost calculations distinguish retail tariffs, demand charges, fuel, and carbon costs

Participants can compare financing structures and allocate key project risks.

• Balance-sheet ownership compared with leasing, project finance, and energy-service models
• Debt-service coverage ratio interpreted for lender assessment of repayment capacity
• Equity returns tested using distribution waterfalls, exit assumptions, and tax treatment
• Blended finance structures combine grants, concessional debt, guarantees, and commercial capital
• Risk allocation matrix assigns development, construction, resource, market, and political risks
• Investment committee papers present assumptions, approvals, conditions, and decision options

Participants can select a procurement route and assess core renewable energy contract terms.

• On-site solar procurement compares purchase, lease, solar service, and PPA models
• Physical and virtual power purchase agreements distinguished by delivery and settlement
• Request-for-proposal documents define scope, technical requirements, pricing, and guarantees
• Bid evaluation matrix weights technical compliance, commercial value, delivery, and safeguards
• PPA terms address tenor, tariff escalation, volume, curtailment, and termination
• Renewable energy certificates assessed for ownership, retirement, and claims integrity

Participants can define technical requirements and quality controls for renewable energy assets.

• Employer's requirements specify output, design life, codes, interfaces, and acceptance tests
• IEC 62446-1 requirements guide photovoltaic documentation, inspection, and commissioning
• Factory acceptance tests verify equipment performance before shipment and installation
• Site acceptance tests confirm output, protection settings, safety, and communications
• Quality inspection plans assign hold points, witness points, records, and responsibilities
• Defect-liability provisions define correction periods, response times, and retention amounts

Participants can plan major construction controls for renewable energy project delivery.

• Work breakdown structures organise development, procurement, construction, commissioning, and handover
• Critical path method identifies schedule dependencies, float, milestones, and delay exposure
• Construction logistics plan addresses access roads, lifting, storage, traffic, and workforce
• Permit-to-work systems control electrical isolation, excavation, lifting, and work-at-height
• HSE plans identify hazards, controls, emergency response, training, and reporting
• Contractor performance tracked through schedule, quality, safety, cost, and change indicators

Participants can establish operating controls and performance measures for renewable assets.

• Operations and maintenance strategy distinguishes preventive, predictive, corrective, and condition-based work
• SCADA data monitors generation, availability, alarms, inverter status, and weather conditions
• Performance guarantees tested against contractual reference conditions and measurement methods
• Availability calculations separate planned outages, forced outages, curtailment, and grid interruptions
• Maintenance planning covers spares, service contracts, warranties, inspections, and response times
• Asset management plans define ownership, records, budgets, inspections, and lifecycle decisions

Participants can measure renewable energy performance and report credible emissions outcomes.

• Metering architecture distinguishes revenue meters, operational meters, submeters, and check meters
• Measurement and verification plans define baselines, boundaries, variables, and reporting periods
• IPMVP options selected for retrofit savings, generation, and facility-level changes
• GHG Protocol Scope 2 methods compare location-based and market-based reporting
• Emissions factors selected using grid data, fuel factors, and contractual instruments
• Performance dashboards communicate generation, savings, emissions, availability, and exceptions

Participants can incorporate lifecycle impacts and end-of-life planning into project decisions.

• ISO 14040 and ISO 14044 frame lifecycle assessment goals and boundaries
• Embodied carbon compared across modules, inverters, batteries, structures, and transport
• Supply-chain due diligence examines minerals, labour conditions, traceability, and supplier controls
• Circular procurement requirements address repairability, warranties, reuse, recycling, and take-back
• Battery end-of-life pathways compare second life, recycling, storage, and disposal
• Lifecycle cost analysis includes replacement cycles, decommissioning, remediation, and residual value

Participants can govern renewable energy projects through structured risks, controls and approvals.

• Risk register records cause, event, consequence, likelihood, owner, and response
• Bow-tie analysis links preventive controls, recovery measures, and assurance activities
• Stage-gate governance defines feasibility, development, investment, construction, and handover decisions
• Change-control procedures assess scope, cost, schedule, quality, and approval impacts
• Project dashboards report milestones, budget, risks, permits, procurement, and technical performance
• Lessons-learned reviews capture decisions, variances, outcomes, and reusable improvements

Participants can build, review and present a complete renewable energy solution business case.

• Project brief defines demand, objectives, site conditions, stakeholders, and decision criteria
• Technology selection substantiated through resource, load, cost, grid, and safeguards evidence
• Preliminary yield and financial model state assumptions, sensitivities, and decision thresholds
• Procurement strategy sets contract route, evaluation criteria, governance, and timetable
• Implementation roadmap sequences approvals, design, construction, commissioning, and performance monitoring
• Executive presentation communicates recommendation, risks, funding need, benefits, and next decisions