Board and Committee Governance Training Course

Duration 10 days 18 modules · 65 contact hours
Level Intermediate Certificate on completion
Who attends Board Directors, Committee Chairs and others
Fee from USD 2,200 KSh 190,000 for Kenyan organisations
Where 52 cities + online See dates by city
Next start 16 Nov 2026 Course code SD-CG-070

Before you join: Participants should have working experience of management decision-making, risk, compliance, finance, internal audit, legal, company secretarial work or board support.

Dates & prices

Two start dates a month in every city, and live online on weekdays or weekends. Fees are per participant; classroom fees include tuition, materials, lunch and refreshments, and the certificate.

Suggest a date or city

Showing the next six months. Later dates, other cities and private deliveries for your team are available on request.

Course overview

Boards and committees are expected to provide informed challenge, set direction, oversee risk and control, and demonstrate sound decision-making under regulatory scrutiny. Failures often arise not from absent policies but from unclear authority, weak information flows, poorly designed committees, undocumented challenge, or insufficient follow-through on decisions. Directors, executives and governance professionals need practical ways to define accountabilities, structure agendas, assess information quality and maintain defensible records.

This course examines how boards and board committees operate in regulated and high-accountability settings. Participants work through board mandates, committee terms of reference, delegation frameworks, reserved matters, director duties, conflicts management, risk governance, internal control oversight, conduct oversight, reporting lines and meeting documentation. They learn to assess board effectiveness, design annual governance calendars, improve management information packs, plan committee work and escalate material issues appropriately. Reference is made to the OECD G20 Principles of Corporate Governance, ISO 37000, the IIA Three Lines Model and the COSO Internal Control Framework.

Teaching combines concise instructor briefings with board-paper reviews, committee scenarios, governance case analysis, decision simulations and structured peer critique. Participants apply each method to a realistic regulated-entity case, such as a bank, insurer, public body, listed company or NGO with donor and fiduciary obligations. They leave with a completed board and committee governance pack: a governance architecture, authority map, committee terms of reference, annual workplan, reporting dashboard and board-effectiveness improvement plan.

The course suits current and aspiring directors, committee members, company secretaries, senior executives, risk and compliance leaders, internal auditors and governance professionals. It is particularly useful where boards must show clear oversight of prudential, conduct, financial, operational, legal or stakeholder risks.

What you will be able to do

  • Assess board and committee effectiveness using structured governance diagnostic criteria
  • Draft board charters, committee terms of reference and matters-reserved schedules
  • Map delegated authorities and escalation routes using a decision-rights matrix
  • Evaluate board papers for relevance, assurance, risk evidence and decision clarity
  • Design risk, control and compliance reporting for committee oversight
  • Apply conflict-of-interest, related-party transaction and director-independence controls
  • Plan annual board and committee work programmes aligned to statutory obligations
  • Present a complete board and committee governance improvement pack

Benefits of attending

For you

  • Greater confidence challenging management information without exceeding the board role
  • Practical methods for chairing, supporting or contributing to committee meetings
  • Clearer judgement on when matters require board escalation or specialist assurance
  • A reusable approach for reviewing terms of reference and delegated authorities
  • Stronger evidence of governance capability for director and senior leadership roles

For your organisation

  • Clearer board, committee and management accountabilities for material decisions
  • Better-quality board papers with explicit recommendations, risks and assurance evidence
  • More reliable oversight of risk, control, compliance and conduct obligations
  • Reduced governance gaps caused by duplicated mandates or unclear delegations
  • A practical improvement plan for board and committee effectiveness

Course modules

18 modules over 10 days

Participants can explain how governance architecture supports accountable oversight and regulatory confidence.

  • Governance purpose, stewardship, accountability and sustainable value creation
  • Board, management and shareholder roles under principal-agent theory
  • Regulatory expectations for oversight, challenge, evidence and escalation
  • OECD G20 Principles applied to board governance responsibilities
  • ISO 37000 principles for governing bodies and organisational purpose
  • Governance failures traced through authority, information and assurance breakdowns

Participants can distinguish board responsibilities from executive management accountabilities.

  • Fiduciary duties, duty of care and duty of loyalty
  • Collective responsibility alongside individual director accountability and dissent
  • Strategic direction, oversight and stewardship separated from executive execution
  • Reserved matters schedules defining decisions retained by the board
  • Board authority limits established through constitutions, bylaws and statutes
  • Documenting dissent, abstention and informed decision-making in meeting records

Participants can construct an authority framework linking board, committees and management.

  • Governance architecture linking owners, board, committees and executive management
  • RACI analysis for recurring governance decisions and accountabilities
  • Decision-rights matrix distinguishing approval, recommendation, consultation and notification
  • Delegation of authority schedules with financial and operational thresholds
  • Escalation triggers for breaches, incidents, exceptions and emerging risks
  • Authority maps tested against urgent decisions and cross-functional dependencies

Participants can assess whether board composition supports independent, competent oversight.

  • Skills matrix aligned with strategy, risk profile and regulatory duties
  • Independence criteria for non-executive directors and committee membership
  • Director appointment processes, due diligence and fit-and-proper assessments
  • Succession planning for chairs, committee chairs and critical expertise
  • Board diversity considered through perspective, experience and decision quality
  • Induction programmes covering mandate, information rights and key risks

Participants can design committee mandates with clear authority, membership and reporting lines.

  • Committee purpose derived from board responsibilities and risk priorities
  • Terms of reference specifying mandate, authority and membership
  • Audit committee responsibilities for reporting, controls and external audit
  • Risk committee oversight of appetite, exposures and risk culture
  • Remuneration committee governance of incentives, performance and conduct
  • Nomination committee responsibilities for composition, succession and evaluation

Participants can support constructive challenge and disciplined decision-making in meetings.

  • Chair responsibilities for agenda discipline, inclusion and decision clarity
  • Constructive challenge techniques using probing, testing and reframing questions
  • Psychological safety balanced with rigorous scrutiny and professional dissent
  • Groupthink indicators identified through consensus, silence and untested assumptions
  • Conflict in meetings managed through interests, evidence and decision rules
  • Closed sessions used for independent discussion and sensitive assurance matters

Participants can build an annual board and committee calendar around key obligations.

  • Annual board calendar aligned with strategy, reporting and regulatory cycles
  • Committee workplans sequenced around decisions, assurance and statutory deadlines
  • Forward agendas separating recurring oversight from strategic discussion
  • Meeting cadence matched to risk volatility and decision frequency
  • Consent agendas used for routine approvals and information items
  • Action logs assigning owners, deadlines, evidence and closure criteria

Participants can evaluate and improve papers submitted for board and committee decisions.

  • Decision paper structure: purpose, recommendation, options, risks and approvals
  • Executive summaries presenting material issues without obscuring supporting evidence
  • Management information tested for relevance, timeliness, comparability and reliability
  • Key performance indicators linked to strategy, thresholds and accountability
  • Assurance statements distinguishing management representation from independent evidence
  • Board paper review checklist identifying gaps, bias and unresolved decisions

Participants can connect risk appetite, reporting and board oversight decisions.

  • Risk appetite statement translated into thresholds, limits and escalation triggers
  • Risk taxonomy covering strategic, financial, operational, conduct and compliance risks
  • Inherent and residual risk assessed using likelihood-impact matrices
  • Risk dashboards showing trends, breaches, controls and management actions
  • Top-risk discussions linked to strategic choices and resource allocation
  • Emerging risk reports tested for assumptions, scenarios and early indicators

Participants can assess whether assurance arrangements give the board reliable control evidence.

  • COSO Internal Control Framework applied to oversight responsibilities
  • Control environment assessed through ethics, authority and accountability
  • IIA Three Lines Model clarifying management and assurance roles
  • Assurance maps linking principal risks, controls and assurance providers
  • Internal audit plans aligned with risk assessment and audit universe
  • Audit findings tracked through root causes, actions and closure evidence

Participants can establish board oversight of compliance obligations, conduct and regulator interactions.

  • Compliance obligations inventory mapped to accountable executives and committees
  • Regulatory correspondence escalated through defined materiality and response protocols
  • Conduct risk indicators covering complaints, sales practices and customer outcomes
  • Whistleblowing arrangements reviewed for independence, confidentiality and retaliation safeguards
  • Breach reporting assessed for root cause, remediation and recurrence risk
  • Regulatory meeting packs prepared with evidence, decisions and action status

Participants can scrutinise financial reporting, audit issues and financial control matters.

  • Financial statements read through performance, position, cash flow and disclosures
  • Material accounting judgements challenged through assumptions and sensitivity analysis
  • Going-concern assessments reviewed against liquidity forecasts and covenant headroom
  • External auditor independence assessed through services, fees and rotation
  • Audit plans reviewed for scope, materiality, risks and reporting timetable
  • Fraud risk oversight linked to controls, investigations and reporting channels

Participants can apply defensible processes for conflicts, ethical concerns and related-party matters.

  • Conflict-of-interest registers maintained with declarations, updates and review dates
  • Interest disclosure procedures applied before discussion, voting and attendance
  • Related-party transactions assessed for fairness, approvals and disclosure requirements
  • Gifts, hospitality and outside appointments governed through policy thresholds
  • Ethical dilemmas tested against purpose, values, stakeholders and legal duties
  • Recusal decisions recorded with affected agenda items and attendance details

Participants can oversee stakeholder reporting and disclosure with appropriate board accountability.

  • Stakeholder mapping identifies affected groups, expectations and accountability channels
  • Materiality assessments connect stakeholder concerns with board reporting priorities
  • Annual report governance disclosures checked against actual governance arrangements
  • Market-sensitive information controlled through disclosure protocols and approval routes
  • Donor, public-sector and member accountability requirements incorporated into reporting
  • Reputation risks assessed through communications, commitments and stakeholder trust

Participants can design oversight arrangements for groups, subsidiaries and controlled entities.

  • Group governance model separates parent oversight from subsidiary fiduciary duties
  • Subsidiary boards assigned mandates, composition and reporting obligations
  • Intragroup service arrangements reviewed for authority, conflicts and accountability
  • Reserved matters calibrated across parent, subsidiary and local management
  • Entity risk reporting escalated through group committees and board channels
  • Cross-border governance considers local law, regulators and reporting requirements

Participants can conduct a structured board-effectiveness review and prioritise improvements.

  • Board evaluation scope covers composition, behaviours, information and outcomes
  • Self-assessment questionnaires designed around observable governance practices
  • Interview evidence analysed for patterns, root causes and priority actions
  • Meeting observation criteria assess challenge, participation and decision discipline
  • Maturity assessment compares current practices against defined governance standards
  • Improvement plans assign actions, owners, milestones and evaluation measures

Participants can organise board and committee oversight during fast-moving material events.

  • Crisis governance protocols define authority, information cadence and decision records
  • Incident severity assessments trigger escalation to executives, committees and boards
  • Special board meetings planned with focused mandates and urgent papers
  • Scenario planning tests liquidity, operational resilience and reputational consequences
  • Post-incident reviews distinguish accountability, lessons learned and remediation ownership
  • Regulator and stakeholder communications coordinated through approved governance channels

Participants can build, review and present a complete board and committee governance improvement pack.

  • Governance diagnostic findings prioritised against material risks and accountabilities
  • Board and committee architecture documented through mandates and reporting lines
  • Decision-rights matrix completed for reserved matters and delegated authority
  • Annual governance calendar integrated with reporting, assurance and review cycles
  • Board-paper checklist and risk dashboard included within the governance pack
  • Improvement roadmap presented with owners, milestones and evidence measures

Exercises and examples are adapted to each cohort's sectors and roles.

What you take back to work

  1. Board and committee governance diagnostic
  2. Matters-reserved and delegated-authority matrix
  3. Committee terms of reference template
  4. Annual board and committee workplan
  5. Board-paper quality review checklist
  6. Governance improvement roadmap

Who should attend

  • Board Directors — strengthen oversight, challenge and documented decision-making
  • Committee Chairs — improve mandates, agendas, reporting and follow-up
  • Company Secretaries — build effective governance processes and board support
  • Chief Risk Officers — connect risk reporting to board and committee decisions
  • Compliance Leaders — demonstrate credible regulatory and conduct oversight
  • Senior Executives — prepare decision-ready papers and operate within delegated authority

Skills and tools covered

Board governance designCommittee effectivenessDecision-rights mappingRisk oversightBoard-paper evaluationGovernance assurance

Tools and standards

OECD G20 Principles of Corporate Governance, ISO 37000 Governance of Organizations, IIA Three Lines Model, COSO Internal Control Framework

How the course runs

Training methodology

The course uses short instructor briefings to establish governance concepts, followed by case work drawn from regulated entities, financial services, public bodies and mission-driven organisations. Participants analyse board papers, test committee mandates, review risk reports and simulate decision escalation. Group exercises focus on chairing dynamics, challenge, conflicts and assurance. Structured application planning links each module to participants' own governance context. Facilitators provide practitioner feedback on draft governance documents and capstone presentations.

Requirements and prerequisites

Participants should have working experience of management decision-making, risk, compliance, finance, internal audit, legal, company secretarial work or board support. They should be familiar with organisational reporting lines and able to read a board paper, policy or risk report. Prior board membership is useful but not required. The course does not require legal qualifications, accounting credentials, prior corporate governance training or detailed knowledge of a particular jurisdiction. Participants should bring an understanding of their organisation's governance structure where available.

A typical training day

08:30 – 10:30First session
10:30 – 10:45Refreshment break
10:45 – 12:30Second session
12:30 – 13:30Lunch and networking
13:30 – 15:00Third session
15:00 – 15:15Refreshment break
15:15 – 16:30Workshop and daily review

Live online deliveries follow the same structure in East Africa Time, with shorter screen blocks and longer breaks.

What the fee includes

  • Instruction by a practitioner facilitator
  • Full course workbook and materials
  • Exercise files, templates and case studies
  • Refreshments and lunch on classroom deliveries
  • Certificate of completion
  • Post-course application plan

Frequently asked questions

Participants need practical familiarity with organisational decision-making, reporting, risk, compliance, finance, audit, legal or governance work. Board experience is useful but not required, and the course does not assume a legal or accounting qualification.

Participants may bring non-confidential examples of their board structure, committee terms of reference, annual calendar or reporting templates. Materials are not mandatory, but they help participants tailor their application plan.

It is designed for directors, committee chairs, company secretaries, senior executives, risk and compliance leaders, internal auditors and governance professionals. It suits both regulated private-sector organisations and public, donor-funded or member-based bodies.

This course concentrates on how boards and committees function: mandates, decision rights, meeting practice, reporting, assurance, risk oversight and documented challenge. It spends less time on broad governance theory and more time on the operating documents and routines used by governing bodies.

Participants can use the diagnostic, authority matrix, committee templates, workplan and board-paper checklist with their own governance arrangements. The capstone pack provides a structured basis for an improvement discussion with a chair, board secretary or executive sponsor.

The first week establishes governance architecture, committee design, decision rights, meeting practice and information quality. The second week focuses on risk, assurance, compliance, finance, conflicts, group governance, evaluation, crisis oversight and the final capstone presentation.

Questions about this course?

Ask about dates, fees, group bookings or running it for your team. Our training team replies by email.