Course overview
Data protection impact assessments (DPIAs) are often treated as compliance paperwork completed late in a project. That approach creates expensive redesign, unclear accountability and weak evidence when regulators, auditors, customers or procurement teams ask how privacy risks were assessed. Organisations introducing biometric access control, customer analytics, employee monitoring, AI-supported decisions, connected products or data-sharing platforms need a repeatable way to identify high-risk processing, test necessity and proportionality, select controls, and document informed decisions.
This course teaches participants to plan, conduct, review and maintain DPIAs using the GDPR and UK GDPR accountability model, European Data Protection Board guidance, ISO/IEC 29134 and related privacy engineering methods. Participants examine lawful bases, special-category data, children’s data, profiling, automated decision-making, international transfers, processor arrangements, retention, data minimisation and data subject rights. The course also addresses how the EU Data Act interacts with data protection requirements when organisations make connected-product and related service data available to users and third parties.
Instructor-led sessions combine short technical briefings with detailed cases, facilitated review of DPIA evidence, risk-rating workshops, stakeholder simulations and structured application planning. Participants progressively develop a DPIA pack for a realistic processing initiative, such as a fraud-monitoring platform, employee monitoring tool, health-data service or smart-device data-sharing programme. They leave with a completed assessment structure, privacy risk register, control plan, consultation record and governance workflow that can be adapted to their own projects.
The course suits privacy, security, compliance, technology, product and operational professionals who contribute to high-risk processing decisions. It is particularly relevant where teams need to make privacy review earlier, more evidence-based and easier to defend.





