Course overview
Climate hazards do not affect all people equally. Drought can increase unpaid water collection, heat can expose outdoor and care workers to greater risk, and flood recovery can exclude women, persons with disabilities, Indigenous Peoples and displaced groups from assets, information and decisions. Climate policies that treat communities as homogeneous can miss these differences, direct resources toward already powerful groups and create unintended harm. Public agencies, development partners, banks and corporate sustainability teams need defensible methods for identifying gendered climate risks and designing adaptation measures that improve equity as well as resilience.
This course develops the policy and programme skills needed to integrate gender equality into climate change adaptation. Participants apply the IPCC risk framework, gender analysis methods, stakeholder and power mapping, participatory consultation approaches, gender-responsive budgeting and monitoring methods. The course examines the UNFCCC Gender Action Plan, National Adaptation Plans, Nationally Determined Contributions, climate-finance requirements and environmental and social safeguards. Sector cases cover agriculture, water, urban heat, health, disaster risk reduction, coastal livelihoods and social protection.
Teaching combines focused instructor briefings with case analysis, facilitated group work, policy-design simulations and structured peer review. Participants work with realistic adaptation scenarios and assess how choices about targeting, participation, finance, safeguards and indicators affect different groups. Each participant leaves with a Gender-Responsive Adaptation Action Pack: a gender analysis, stakeholder map, draft results framework, indicator set, budget considerations and a 90-day application plan for a live or planned policy, project or programme.
The course is suited to professionals responsible for adaptation policy, climate programmes, investment decisions, social safeguards, monitoring or community engagement. It is particularly relevant where institutions must show that climate funding, public expenditure and adaptation interventions deliver fair and measurable benefits.

