Knowledge Audit and Gap Analysis Training Course

Duration 5 days 10 modules · 33 contact hours
Level Intermediate Certificate on completion
Who attends Knowledge Managers, Records Managers and others
Fee from USD 1,100 KSh 95,000 for Kenyan organisations
Where 52 cities + online See dates by city
Next start 16 Nov 2026 Course code SD-KRM-039

Before you join: Participants should have practical familiarity with their organisation's processes, information sources or service areas.

Dates & prices

Two start dates a month in every city, and live online on weekdays or weekends. Fees are per participant; classroom fees include tuition, materials, lunch and refreshments, and the certificate.

Suggest a date or city

Showing the next six months. Later dates, other cities and private deliveries for your team are available on request.

Course overview

Organisations often hold critical knowledge in individual experience, disconnected repositories, email archives, project files and undocumented workarounds. This creates delays, repeated errors, weak handovers, compliance exposure and avoidable dependence on key people. A knowledge audit identifies what knowledge is needed for priority work, where it resides, who uses it, how it moves and where gaps, duplication or access barriers affect performance.

This course equips participants to plan and conduct a structured knowledge audit and gap analysis. Participants examine business priorities, critical knowledge domains, knowledge flows, repositories, records controls, stakeholder needs and knowledge risks. They apply knowledge mapping, interviews, surveys, document review, process analysis and gap-rating methods to produce evidence-based findings. The course also addresses the distinction between knowledge management and records management, using ISO 30401 and ISO 15489 as reference points for governance, controls and improvement planning.

Teaching combines short technical briefings with cases from public administration, financial services, infrastructure, health, NGOs and corporate functions. Participants work through audit scoping decisions, stakeholder interviews, knowledge-flow analysis, gap prioritisation and recommendation design. They leave with a reusable knowledge audit toolkit, including a charter, data-collection instruments, knowledge map, gap register, maturity assessment and implementation roadmap.

The course suits managers and specialists responsible for knowledge, records, information, learning, process improvement, operational risk or organisational performance. It is particularly useful where leaders need defensible evidence before investing in repositories, collaboration platforms, retention programmes, communities of practice or knowledge-transfer initiatives.

What you will be able to do

  • Define a knowledge audit scope linked to business priorities and operational risks
  • Map critical knowledge domains, holders, sources, flows and repositories
  • Apply interviews, surveys, document reviews and process observation methods
  • Assess knowledge gaps using demand, availability, quality, accessibility and currency criteria
  • Evaluate records controls against relevant ISO 15489 principles
  • Rate knowledge management practices using an adapted maturity assessment
  • Prioritise knowledge risks and improvement actions using impact and urgency criteria
  • Produce a knowledge audit report and phased implementation roadmap

Benefits of attending

For you

  • Produce a defensible knowledge audit scope and terms of reference
  • Identify critical knowledge dependencies before they become operational failures
  • Conduct structured stakeholder interviews on knowledge needs and barriers
  • Convert audit evidence into prioritised improvement recommendations
  • Build a practical portfolio of knowledge and records governance templates

For your organisation

  • Reduced dependence on undocumented expertise held by individual employees
  • Clearer priorities for repositories, retention controls and knowledge-transfer investment
  • Earlier identification of knowledge gaps affecting service quality and compliance
  • Stronger evidence for records governance and information management decisions
  • A repeatable audit method for functions, programmes and business units

Course modules

10 modules over 5 days

Participants can define a focused knowledge audit charter aligned with organisational priorities.

  • Knowledge audit purposes: performance improvement, risk control, continuity and innovation
  • Distinguishing knowledge audits from information audits, records audits and skills assessments
  • Audit charter elements: objectives, scope, sponsors, stakeholders, outputs and boundaries
  • Business-priority analysis using strategic objectives, service commitments and risk registers
  • Critical knowledge criteria: scarcity, consequence, volatility, sensitivity and transferability
  • Governance roles for sponsors, audit leads, subject experts and data owners

Participants can distinguish knowledge assets from records and identify their control requirements.

  • Tacit, explicit, embedded and procedural knowledge within operational work
  • Records, information assets and knowledge assets distinguished by purpose
  • ISO 30401 knowledge management system principles and organisational context
  • ISO 15489 principles for authentic, reliable, usable and integral records
  • Knowledge lifecycle stages: creation, capture, sharing, use, retention and disposal
  • Confidentiality, privacy, intellectual property and access restrictions affecting audit evidence

Participants can identify the knowledge required to perform priority processes and decisions.

  • Process decomposition identifies knowledge-intensive steps, decisions and handoffs
  • Critical incident review reveals knowledge failures behind delays and errors
  • Decision mapping links key decisions to required evidence and expertise
  • Role-based analysis identifies knowledge requirements for frontline and specialist work
  • Customer journey evidence exposes knowledge gaps affecting service delivery
  • Knowledge requirement statements specify users, tasks, decisions, sources and timing

Participants can create knowledge maps that show sources, holders, flows and bottlenecks.

  • Knowledge maps show domains, experts, repositories, users and exchange channels
  • Social network analysis identifies central experts, brokers and isolated teams
  • Process knowledge-flow mapping traces capture, validation, transfer and reuse
  • Repository inventories record content types, ownership, access and retention status
  • Knowledge source mapping distinguishes authoritative sources from informal workarounds
  • Bottleneck analysis highlights approval delays, inaccessible records and single-person dependencies

Participants can select and plan evidence-gathering methods suited to the audit scope.

  • Semi-structured interviews explore knowledge needs, behaviours, barriers and workarounds
  • Survey design uses clear constructs, response scales and sampling logic
  • Document review tests currency, ownership, duplication, completeness and accessibility
  • Observation protocols capture knowledge use during decisions, transactions and handovers
  • Focus groups compare perspectives across roles, functions and locations
  • Evidence matrices link audit questions, sources, methods, findings and limitations

Participants can assess and describe gaps between required and available knowledge.

  • Gap statements compare required knowledge with available, accessible and trusted knowledge
  • Demand-supply analysis identifies shortages, duplication and underused knowledge assets
  • Accessibility assessment tests searchability, permissions, format, location and retrieval time
  • Quality criteria assess accuracy, completeness, currency, authority and contextual relevance
  • Knowledge loss analysis examines retirement, turnover, outsourcing and restructuring exposure
  • Root cause analysis separates content gaps from process, culture and technology causes

Participants can assess whether records and repositories support reliable knowledge use.

  • Classification schemes support consistent filing, discovery, retention and disposition
  • Metadata assessment tests titles, owners, dates, security labels and retention fields
  • Retention schedules identify records requiring preservation, review or authorised disposal
  • Version control prevents reliance on superseded procedures, forms and guidance
  • Access-control review examines permissions, segregation, audit trails and exception handling
  • Authoritative-source registers identify approved policies, procedures, templates and technical guidance

Participants can rate current practices and prioritise gaps using transparent criteria.

  • APQC knowledge management framework categories support structured maturity assessment
  • Maturity scales define ad hoc, repeatable, defined, managed and improving practices
  • Risk scoring combines likelihood, operational impact, control strength and detectability
  • Heat maps display priority knowledge risks for leadership review
  • Impact-urgency matrices sequence remediation actions and investment decisions
  • Stakeholder validation tests findings against operational evidence and competing priorities

Participants can convert audit findings into implementable recommendations and governance actions.

  • Recommendation design specifies actions, owners, dependencies, resources and success measures
  • Quick wins address high-impact gaps with limited implementation effort
  • Knowledge-transfer controls include mentoring, after-action reviews and structured handovers
  • Repository improvements address taxonomy, search, ownership, lifecycle and access issues
  • Audit reports separate evidence, findings, implications, recommendations and assumptions
  • Roadmaps sequence immediate, medium-term and longer-term governance improvements

Participants can establish monitoring arrangements and an application plan for recurring audits.

  • Audit cycles align review frequency with operational change and risk exposure
  • Key performance indicators measure reuse, search success, currency and transfer completion
  • Control owners monitor corrective actions, overdue reviews and residual knowledge risks
  • Lessons learned registers capture audit insights for future assessment teams
  • Management review agendas connect audit results with resource and policy decisions
  • Application plans define first steps, stakeholders, evidence sources and review dates

Exercises and examples are adapted to each cohort's sectors and roles.

What you take back to work

  1. Knowledge audit charter template
  2. Critical knowledge requirements matrix
  3. Knowledge map and flow analysis model
  4. Audit interview and survey question bank
  5. Knowledge gap and risk register
  6. Phased knowledge improvement roadmap

Who should attend

  • Knowledge Managers — need evidence to target knowledge management investments
  • Records Managers — need to connect recordkeeping controls with operational knowledge needs
  • Information Governance Managers — need to identify information and knowledge control weaknesses
  • Learning and Development Managers — need to identify capability and knowledge-transfer gaps
  • Operational Excellence Managers — need to reduce rework caused by unavailable critical knowledge
  • Risk and Compliance Managers — need visibility of knowledge dependencies and retention risks

Skills and tools covered

Knowledge audit planningKnowledge mappingGap analysisRecords governanceKnowledge risk assessmentImprovement roadmapping

Tools and standards

ISO 30401 Knowledge Management Systems, ISO 15489 Records Management, APQC Knowledge Management Framework, Social Network Analysis

How the course runs

Training methodology

The course uses short instructor briefings to introduce audit methods, standards and decision criteria. Participants analyse realistic cases, review sample evidence, build knowledge maps and compare gap-rating approaches in small groups. Facilitated simulations develop interview planning, stakeholder questioning and recommendation writing. Group discussions examine common obstacles such as informal workarounds, restricted records, fragmented repositories and expert dependency. Each participant develops an application plan for a knowledge audit relevant to their own organisational context.

Requirements and prerequisites

Participants should have practical familiarity with their organisation's processes, information sources or service areas. Experience in knowledge management, records management, process improvement, quality, risk, learning or business analysis is useful. Participants should be comfortable discussing business requirements with operational stakeholders and reviewing basic organisational documents. Prior formal study of ISO standards, audit methodology, data analysis or records classification is not required. The course explains the required concepts and provides structured methods that participants can adapt to their own function or programme.

A typical training day

08:30 – 10:30First session
10:30 – 10:45Refreshment break
10:45 – 12:30Second session
12:30 – 13:30Lunch and networking
13:30 – 15:00Third session
15:00 – 15:15Refreshment break
15:15 – 16:30Workshop and daily review

Live online deliveries follow the same structure in East Africa Time, with shorter screen blocks and longer breaks.

What the fee includes

  • Instruction by a practitioner facilitator
  • Full course workbook and materials
  • Exercise files, templates and case studies
  • Refreshments and lunch on classroom deliveries
  • Certificate of completion
  • Post-course application plan

Frequently asked questions

Participants need familiarity with their organisation's work, information sources or operational processes. Previous formal training in knowledge management, records management or ISO standards is not required.

Bring examples of a process, service, programme or business area where access to knowledge affects performance. Participants may also bring non-confidential examples of repository structures, retention schedules, procedures or audit reports.

The course is designed for knowledge, records, information governance, learning, operations, quality, risk and compliance professionals. It also suits managers sponsoring a knowledge audit or improvement programme.

Records management courses focus primarily on recordkeeping controls, retention and disposal. This course uses records controls as one evidence area within a wider assessment of knowledge needs, flows, gaps, risks and improvement priorities.

Participants can use the templates to scope an audit for a function, programme, critical process or service line. The methods support evidence gathering, gap prioritisation and preparation of recommendations for management review.

The five days contain approximately 32.5 contact hours, delivered through ten connected modules. Time is divided between methods briefings, case analysis, group work, simulations and planning for workplace application.

Questions about this course?

Ask about dates, fees, group bookings or running it for your team. Our training team replies by email.