NGO Public Health Monitoring and Evaluation Training Course

5 days Public Health Certificate on completion
Course codeSD-PH-020
Duration5 days
LevelIntermediate
CategoryPublic Health
DeliveryClassroom or live online
LanguageEnglish
CertificateCertificate of completion

Course overview

NGO public health programmes are expected to show more than activity counts. Donors, ministries of health and community partners need credible evidence that outreach, service-delivery and behaviour-change interventions are reaching intended populations and contributing to measurable health outcomes. Staff often inherit indicator sets, reporting templates and routine data systems that do not align, making it difficult to identify data-quality problems, explain performance variance or produce decision-ready reports.

This course builds practical monitoring and evaluation capability for public health projects, from theory of change and logframe design through indicator reference sheets, sampling, data collection, routine data quality assessment and evaluation planning. Participants learn to distinguish outputs, outcomes and impact; formulate SMART indicators with numerator, denominator, disaggregation and data-source definitions; build monitoring plans; analyse coverage and trend data in Excel; and apply OECD DAC evaluation criteria to public health interventions. The course addresses common NGO settings including maternal and child health, immunisation, nutrition, WASH, HIV, TB and community health programmes.

Instructor-led sessions are paired with a five-day public health programme case study. Participants work with a realistic results framework, KoboToolbox-style survey data and DHIS2-style routine reporting extracts to investigate weak performance, assess data quality and communicate findings. Each participant leaves with a completed M&E package: a theory of change, indicator performance-tracking table, data collection and quality-assurance plan, analysis workbook and concise donor-facing learning brief tailored to a current or planned programme.

The programme is designed for practitioners who already contribute to NGO health projects and need to take greater responsibility for evidence, reporting, adaptive management or evaluation commissioning. It is equally useful for managers approving M&E plans who need to challenge indicators, resource data systems and act on findings with confidence.

Course objectives

By the end of this course, participants will be able to:

  • Construct a public health theory of change linking intervention activities, assumptions, outputs, outcomes and intended impact
  • Develop a logframe with SMART health indicators, baselines, targets, disaggregation requirements and verification sources
  • Write indicator reference sheets defining numerator, denominator, calculation method, frequency, responsibility and data limitations
  • Build a costed monitoring plan and indicator performance-tracking table for an NGO health programme
  • Apply routine data quality assessment methods to test completeness, timeliness, accuracy and internal consistency
  • Analyse service-coverage, utilisation and disaggregated outcome data in Microsoft Excel using pivot tables, charts and variance calculations
  • Design a mixed-methods evaluation plan using evaluation questions, sampling logic, data-collection tools and OECD DAC criteria
  • Produce a decision-focused M&E learning brief that presents findings, limitations, recommendations and management actions

Benefits of attending

For you

  • Gain the ability to challenge weak health indicators before they enter donor proposals or reporting templates
  • Build credible evidence products for progression into MEAL Officer, M&E Specialist or Health Programme Manager roles
  • Use data-quality findings to explain whether poor results reflect programme performance or reporting weaknesses
  • Create Excel-based performance analyses that support clearer conversations with technical teams and senior management
  • Leave with a reusable M&E package that can be adapted to an active NGO public health project

For your organisation

  • Improve consistency between programme theories of change, logframes, indicator definitions and donor reports
  • Reduce the risk of inaccurate health results claims through structured routine data quality checks
  • Strengthen management decisions by linking coverage, utilisation and disaggregated data to corrective actions
  • Increase readiness for donor monitoring visits, audits, evaluations and ministry data-verification processes
  • Create a practical internal template set for monitoring plans, indicator reference sheets and learning briefs

Target competencies

Health indicator designTheory of changeRoutine data qualityCoverage data analysisEvaluation planningEvidence-based reporting

Who should attend

  • Monitoring, Evaluation, Accountability and Learning Officers — who design indicator systems and prepare evidence for donors and programme managers
  • Public Health Programme Managers — who need to use routine data to improve service delivery and justify programme decisions
  • Health Project Officers — who collect, compile or validate facility and community-level monitoring data
  • NGO Data Analysts — who turn programme datasets into reliable coverage, trend and disaggregation analysis
  • Technical Advisors in Health — who must assess whether intervention designs have measurable and credible results pathways
  • Grants and Reporting Managers — who need defensible results narratives, indicator updates and donor reporting evidence

Requirements and prerequisites

Participants should have at least six months of experience supporting, managing or reporting on a health, nutrition, WASH, HIV, TB, immunisation or community health project. They should understand basic project terms such as activities, outputs, outcomes, targets and beneficiaries, and be comfortable working with simple tables in Microsoft Excel. Prior use of DHIS2, KoboToolbox, statistical software or formal evaluation methods is not required. The course does not assume epidemiology training, advanced statistics or coding. Participants will gain most value by bringing a current logframe, indicator list or reporting challenge, although this is optional.

Training methodology

The course combines focused instructor-led demonstrations with a single NGO public health case study that develops across all five days. Participants build and critique a theory of change, calculate indicators from routine service data, inspect reporting anomalies, and use Excel to create pivot-table summaries and charts. Small groups conduct a simulated data-quality review and evaluation-design workshop, then present recommendations to a mock programme steering group. The final session includes individual application planning, allowing each participant to adapt the course templates to a live health programme, reporting cycle or evaluation assignment.

Course outline

Day 1: Results architecture for NGO public health programmes

  • Public health programme results chains and causal pathways
  • Theory of change assumptions and external risk analysis
  • Logframe structure for health and social care interventions
  • Distinguishing activities, outputs, outcomes and impact
  • Equity, gender and disability inclusion in results design
  • Donor reporting requirements and national health information alignment
  • Adaptive management triggers within a results framework

Workshop: Participants map a theory of change and draft a results chain for a community maternal and child health programme.

Day 2: Indicators, targets and monitoring systems

  • SMART indicator selection for public health interventions
  • Numerators, denominators and indicator calculation rules
  • Indicator reference sheet design and metadata fields
  • Baseline, target and milestone setting methods
  • Age, sex, geography and vulnerability disaggregation
  • Indicator performance-tracking table construction
  • Monitoring plans, reporting calendars and role assignments

Workshop: Participants create three indicator reference sheets and an indicator performance-tracking table for the case programme.

Day 3: Data collection and routine data quality

  • Routine health information systems and DHIS2 reporting flows
  • KoboToolbox form design for household and community data
  • Data-source mapping across facilities, outreach teams and partners
  • Routine data quality assessment dimensions
  • Completeness, timeliness, accuracy and consistency checks
  • Data-cleaning rules, audit trails and version control
  • Ethical handling of personal and sensitive health information

Workshop: Participants conduct a desk-based routine data quality assessment and produce a corrective-action log from flawed monthly reports.

Day 4: Analysis, interpretation and evaluation design

  • Coverage, utilisation and referral-completion measures
  • Excel pivot tables for facility and community health data
  • Trend analysis, target variance and outlier detection
  • Disaggregated analysis for equity gaps
  • Interpreting findings against programme context and assumptions
  • OECD DAC evaluation criteria in public health settings
  • Mixed-methods evaluation questions, sampling and tool selection

Workshop: Participants analyse a service-delivery dataset in Excel and draft an evaluation matrix for an underperforming intervention.

Day 5: Learning, reporting and M&E action planning

  • Results narratives that distinguish evidence from attribution
  • Data visualisation choices for donor and management audiences
  • Learning questions and after-action review methods
  • Recommendation prioritisation using feasibility and expected effect
  • Communicating data limitations and uncertainty
  • M&E budget lines, staffing and implementation sequencing
  • M&E action plans for the next reporting cycle

Workshop: Participants produce and present a donor-facing learning brief, supported by an M&E action plan for their programme case.

Tools & standards covered

DHIS2, KoboToolbox, Microsoft Excel, OECD DAC Evaluation Criteria

A typical training day

08:30 – 10:30First session
10:30 – 10:45Refreshment break
10:45 – 12:30Second session
12:30 – 13:30Lunch and networking
13:30 – 15:00Third session
15:00 – 15:15Refreshment break
15:15 – 16:30Workshop and daily review

Live online deliveries follow the same structure in the East Africa Time zone, with shorter screen blocks and longer breaks.

What the fee includes

  • Instruction by a practitioner facilitator
  • Full course workbook and materials
  • Exercise files, templates and case studies
  • Certificate of completion
  • Refreshments and lunch (classroom deliveries)
  • Post-course application plan
  • Facilitator follow-up on request
  • Group rates from five participants

How you can take this course

Classroom

Scheduled sessions in Nairobi, Mombasa, Kigali, Dar es Salaam, Dubai and Cape Town.

Live online

The same facilitator and materials, delivered live for distributed teams and individuals.

In-house

Delivered privately for your team, at your offices or a venue of your choice, tailored to your context. Request a proposal.

Certification

Participants who complete the full five days receive the Skillset Development Certificate of Completion, stating the course title, course code, dates and delivery format — suitable for professional-development records and employer reimbursement.

Frequently asked questions

You should understand basic project terms such as outputs, outcomes, targets and beneficiaries, and have some exposure to health programme delivery or reporting. Formal training in epidemiology, statistics or evaluation is not required.

A laptop with Microsoft Excel is strongly recommended for the data-analysis exercises. DHIS2 and KoboToolbox are demonstrated through guided examples, so participants do not need administrator access or pre-existing accounts.

It is designed for MEAL staff, health project officers, programme managers, technical advisors, data analysts and grants staff working on public health portfolios. It is most useful where staff must turn routine programme data into credible reporting and management decisions.

The examples, indicator calculations and case work are specific to NGO public health programming, including facility data, community outreach, coverage measures, referral pathways and health-information reporting. It also addresses the practical relationship between donor reporting, DHIS2-style routine data and programme adaptation.

Participants can use the provided templates to revise an indicator reference sheet, establish data-quality checks, improve an indicator tracking table or prepare a more defensible results narrative. The final action plan identifies priorities for the next reporting cycle or programme review.

You leave with a completed public health M&E package developed through the case study: a theory of change, logframe components, indicator sheets, monitoring plan, data-quality log, Excel analysis and learning brief. These materials are structured as working templates for adaptation to your organisation's programme.

Upcoming sessions

New dates are being scheduled. Ask us about the next session or an in-house delivery for your team.

Ask about dates

Group of 5+?

Request in-house delivery or group rates →

Related courses in Public Health

5 Days Certificate

Public Health Programme Leadership for District Health Managers Training Course

District health managers are expected to convert national health priorities into services that function across facilities, communities, supp…

5 Days Certificate

Public Health Policy Implementation for Government Agencies Training Course

Public health policies often fail between approval and delivery: guidance reaches local teams late, funding rules are unclear, data definiti…

5 Days Certificate

Advanced Public Health Economic Evaluation Training Course

Public health teams must often choose between programmes whose benefits occur at different times, affect different population groups, and de…

5 Days Certificate

Public Health Foundations for Health Professionals Training Course

Health professionals are increasingly expected to look beyond individual consultations, wards or service lines and identify the population f…