Porter's Five Forces for Industry Strategy Planning Training Course
| Course code | SD-SP-017 |
|---|---|
| Duration | 5 days |
| Level | Intermediate to Advanced |
| Category | Strategic Planning |
| Delivery | Classroom or live online |
| Language | English |
| Certificate | Certificate of completion |
Course overview
Industry strategy often fails because teams describe market conditions without testing the economic mechanisms that shape profitability. Leaders may label a market “competitive” yet lack evidence on buyer switching costs, supplier concentration, substitute economics, new entrant barriers, or the intensity of rivalry. This course gives participants a disciplined way to assess these forces, distinguish structural threats from temporary market noise, and convert findings into defensible strategic planning choices.
Participants learn to construct a rigorous Porter’s Five Forces assessment using market data, competitor evidence, value-chain analysis, pricing signals, customer research, and scenario assumptions. They quantify bargaining power, identify credible entry barriers, map substitute threats, assess rivalry drivers, and test how force changes affect margins, investment priorities, and growth options. The course also addresses common misuses of the model, including treating competitors as the only source of pressure, confusing a high-growth market with an attractive one, and producing descriptive rather than decision-ready analyses.
Instructor-led workshops use a selected industry or participant business context to move from evidence gathering to executive recommendation. Participants work with Five Forces scoring matrices, market concentration calculations, stakeholder maps, scenario worksheets, and strategic response options. They leave with a documented industry attractiveness assessment, an evidence register, a force-by-force risk and opportunity map, and a concise strategy-planning briefing suitable for review by senior management.
The course is designed for experienced managers, strategy professionals, commercial leaders, and analysts who contribute to market-entry, portfolio, competitive, investment, or annual strategic planning decisions. It is especially valuable where teams need a consistent method for challenging assumptions before committing resources.
Course objectives
By the end of this course, participants will be able to:
- Construct a Porter’s Five Forces analysis using defined industry boundaries, evidence sources, and scoring criteria
- Assess buyer bargaining power through concentration, switching-cost, price-sensitivity, and backward-integration indicators
- Evaluate supplier power using input criticality, supplier concentration, substitutability, and switching-risk analysis
- Identify entry barriers using scale economies, channel access, capital requirements, regulation, and incumbent response tests
- Quantify rivalry intensity with market concentration ratios, capacity conditions, differentiation factors, and exit barriers
- Compare substitute threats through customer jobs-to-be-done, price-performance trade-offs, and switching triggers
- Translate force assessments into strategic response options for pricing, positioning, partnerships, investment, and market entry
- Produce an executive-ready industry attractiveness briefing with evidence, assumptions, scenarios, and recommended actions
Benefits of attending
For you
- Gain a repeatable method for diagnosing why an industry produces weak, stable, or attractive returns
- Build credibility in planning discussions by challenging market assumptions with explicit structural evidence
- Create stronger market-entry and investment recommendations than a competitor-list or SWOT-only assessment permits
- Improve ability to explain pricing and margin pressure in terms senior leaders can act upon
- Leave with a portfolio-quality industry strategy briefing that demonstrates structured strategic analysis
For your organisation
- Standardise how teams assess industry attractiveness before approving growth, investment, acquisition, or entry proposals
- Reduce reliance on anecdotal competitor intelligence by requiring evidence for each structural-force judgement
- Identify margin risks earlier through clearer analysis of buyer power, supplier dependency, substitutes, and rivalry
- Improve strategic-planning discussions by separating structural market conditions from short-term operational issues
- Generate practical response options for strengthening differentiation, switching costs, channel access, and negotiating position
Target competencies
Who should attend
- Strategy Managers — who must turn market intelligence into choices for growth, investment, and competitive positioning
- Business Unit Leaders — who need to defend where to compete and how to protect unit profitability
- Corporate Development Managers — who assess industry attractiveness before acquisitions, partnerships, or new-market entry
- Commercial Directors — who need to understand structural pressure on pricing, channels, customers, and margins
- Market Intelligence Analysts — who must convert fragmented external research into a decision-ready industry assessment
- Product Portfolio Managers — who evaluate substitute risks, competitive pressure, and long-term category economics
Requirements and prerequisites
Participants should have practical experience of their organisation’s market, customers, competitors, products, suppliers, or planning cycle. They should be comfortable reading basic business data such as revenue trends, market-share estimates, price comparisons, and customer segments, and should understand core terms including margin, market share, value chain, and competitive advantage. Familiarity with SWOT or PESTLE is useful but not essential. Participants should bring a laptop and, where possible, public or internal information about one industry or business unit. No finance qualification, advanced statistics, coding, or prior strategy-consulting experience is required.
Training methodology
The programme combines instructor-led explanation of the Five Forces model with evidence-based analysis workshops. Participants examine industry datasets, pricing examples, customer and supplier scenarios, and short case materials to test each force rather than score it by intuition. Small groups build force maps, challenge assumptions, calculate simple concentration indicators in Microsoft Excel, and compare strategic responses. The final day uses a facilitated application clinic in which each participant converts their analysis into a concise industry strategy briefing and receives peer and instructor critique.
Course outline
Day 1: Defining the industry and the strategic question
- Purpose and limits of Porter’s Five Forces in strategic planning
- Industry definition versus market, segment, category, and value-chain definitions
- Selecting the strategic decision the analysis must inform
- Identifying profit pools and the unit of analysis
- Separating structural conditions from cyclical performance
- Evidence standards for Five Forces assessments
- Five Forces scoring scales and confidence ratings
Workshop: Participants define the industry boundary, decision question, evidence sources, and scoring criteria for their selected business context.
Day 2: Buyer and supplier bargaining power
- Buyer concentration and purchase-volume analysis
- Customer switching costs and multi-sourcing behaviour
- Price sensitivity, procurement leverage, and backward integration
- Supplier concentration and input dependency mapping
- Input criticality, specification control, and supply alternatives
- Supplier switching costs and forward-integration threats
- Value-chain leverage points and margin capture
Workshop: Participants create buyer and supplier power assessments supported by a stakeholder map, evidence register, and preliminary force scores.
Day 3: New entrants, substitutes, and industry boundaries
- Economies of scale and experience-curve barriers
- Capital requirements, regulation, patents, and proprietary capabilities
- Distribution access, ecosystem control, and network effects
- Incumbent retaliation and credible deterrence signals
- Jobs-to-be-done analysis for substitute identification
- Price-performance comparison of substitute offers
- Technology change and adjacent-market entry scenarios
Workshop: Participants test two entry scenarios and build a substitute-threat map showing customer triggers, switching paths, and implications for demand.
Day 4: Rivalry, profitability, and strategic responses
- Rivalry drivers: competitor balance, growth, capacity, and differentiation
- Concentration ratios and Herfindahl-Hirschman Index calculations
- Fixed costs, perishability, and capacity utilisation pressure
- Exit barriers and escalation of competitive commitment
- Linking force intensity to industry profitability
- Strategic response options for each competitive force
- Trade-offs between positioning, partnerships, vertical integration, and market exit
Workshop: Participants calculate concentration measures in Microsoft Excel and develop a force-to-response matrix for their industry case.
Day 5: From analysis to a decision-ready strategy plan
- Synthesising force scores into an industry attractiveness judgement
- Testing assumptions with base, upside, and downside scenarios
- Prioritising strategic issues by impact, urgency, and controllability
- Designing leading indicators for force changes
- Linking Five Forces findings to SWOT, PESTLE, and strategic objectives
- Writing executive recommendations and decision requests
- Presenting limitations, uncertainty, and evidence gaps
Workshop: Participants complete and present an executive industry strategy briefing containing their Five Forces assessment, scenarios, strategic actions, and evidence gaps.
Tools & standards covered
Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, Miro, Google Trends
A typical training day
| 08:30 – 10:30 | First session |
| 10:30 – 10:45 | Refreshment break |
| 10:45 – 12:30 | Second session |
| 12:30 – 13:30 | Lunch and networking |
| 13:30 – 15:00 | Third session |
| 15:00 – 15:15 | Refreshment break |
| 15:15 – 16:30 | Workshop and daily review |
Live online deliveries follow the same structure in the East Africa Time zone, with shorter screen blocks and longer breaks.
What the fee includes
- Instruction by a practitioner facilitator
- Full course workbook and materials
- Exercise files, templates and case studies
- Certificate of completion
- Refreshments and lunch (classroom deliveries)
- Post-course application plan
- Facilitator follow-up on request
- Group rates from five participants
How you can take this course
Classroom
Scheduled sessions in Nairobi, Mombasa, Kigali, Dar es Salaam, Dubai and Cape Town.
Live online
The same facilitator and materials, delivered live for distributed teams and individuals.
In-house
Delivered privately for your team, at your offices or a venue of your choice, tailored to your context. Request a proposal.
Certification
Participants who complete the full five days receive the Skillset Development Certificate of Completion, stating the course title, course code, dates and delivery format — suitable for professional-development records and employer reimbursement.
Frequently asked questions
Upcoming sessions
New dates are being scheduled. Ask us about the next session or an in-house delivery for your team.
Ask about datesGroup of 5+?
Request in-house delivery or group rates →Related courses in Strategic Planning
VRIO Analysis for Resource Based Strategy Planning Training Course
Strategic plans often identify attractive markets, growth priorities and competitor threats, yet fail to explain which internal resources ca…
Strategic Planning for Senior Executives Training Course
Senior executives are expected to set direction amid volatile markets, competing investment demands, regulatory pressure and stakeholder scr…
McKinsey 7S Framework for Strategy Execution Planning Training Course
Strategy execution often fails not because the strategic direction is wrong, but because the organisation’s structure, decision rights, capa…
Advanced Strategic Planning for Corporate Growth Training Course
Corporate growth plans often fail not because leaders lack ambition, but because strategic choices are not translated into a tested growth l…