Course overview
Procurement savings targets often fail because teams negotiate from quoted prices rather than from a verified cost baseline, supplier-market evidence and a clear commercial mandate. Buyers may secure an apparent discount yet increase total cost through specifications, logistics, payment terms, poor demand control or unmeasured implementation costs. Effective cost reduction requires disciplined category analysis, credible alternatives, sound negotiation planning and controls that distinguish real savings from budget assumptions.
This course equips participants to analyse spend, identify cost drivers, challenge requirements and select sourcing approaches suited to the category and supplier market. Participants use the Kraljic Portfolio Matrix, spend cubes, Pareto analysis, should-cost modelling, total cost of ownership and supplier-market mapping. They prepare negotiation mandates, establish BATNA, target price, reservation price and ZOPA, and practise commercial conversations covering price, volume, service levels, payment terms, indexation and contractual risk. The course also addresses savings measurement, supplier performance and implementation governance.
Teaching combines focused instructor briefings with procurement cases, group analysis, negotiation simulations and structured peer review. Cases reflect common purchasing situations such as a manufacturing buyer facing commodity inflation, a bank consolidating professional-services suppliers, and a public-sector team reducing facilities-management costs while maintaining service standards. Participants leave with a reusable negotiation preparation pack, cost-analysis templates, a savings tracking model and a category action plan. The course is available as a five-day classroom programme in more than 50 cities or through live online delivery. Each participant receives a certificate of completion.
The course suits procurement professionals who already buy goods or services and need stronger methods for converting analysis into measurable commercial outcomes. It is particularly relevant where spend is material, supplier dependency is high, or cost reduction must be achieved without damaging quality, continuity or stakeholder relationships.

