Course overview
Capital investment decisions commit funds for years, often before demand, costs, regulations, or technology are certain. Finance teams must distinguish accounting profit from decision-relevant cash flow, choose an appropriate discount rate, quantify uncertainty, and present recommendations that decision-makers can challenge. Weak appraisal can approve projects with attractive headline returns but poor cash generation, underestimate working-capital needs, or overlook risks that should change the investment structure.
This course develops the methods used to evaluate replacement, expansion, infrastructure, technology, lease-or-buy, and international investment proposals. Participants build incremental after-tax cash flows, calculate net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), payback, profitability index, and equivalent annual cost. They estimate weighted average cost of capital (WACC), address inflation and tax, model working capital and terminal value, and assess risk through scenarios, sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo simulation, decision trees, and real options.
Instructor-led briefings are combined with financial-model reviews, sector-based cases, group analysis, and structured challenge discussions. Participants work through investment proposals resembling those found in banking, manufacturing, public infrastructure, energy, healthcare, and technology programmes. They leave with a reusable capital-investment appraisal pack: an integrated cash-flow model structure, assumptions register, risk-analysis framework, investment memorandum outline, and post-investment review checklist. The five-day course is available in classrooms in 50+ cities or live online. Each training day runs from 08:30 to 16:30 and provides approximately 6.5 contact hours. Participants receive a certificate of completion.
The course suits finance professionals and managers who prepare, review, approve, or monitor material capital expenditure proposals. It is particularly relevant where investment decisions require clear financial evidence, documented assumptions, governance controls, and a defensible recommendation.


