Course overview
Employment rights failures often arise where employment arrangements are least visible: agency labour, migrant recruitment, outsourced services, platform work, temporary contracts and informal reporting channels. HR and labour relations professionals must identify whether workers receive lawful pay, working time protections, equal treatment, freedom of association and protection from retaliation. They must also act quickly where forced labour, trafficking, child labour, harassment or wage theft indicators emerge. Poor controls can expose employers to claims, regulatory scrutiny, contract loss, industrial disputes and serious harm to workers.
This course examines the rights and protections affecting workers at heightened risk of exploitation or exclusion. Participants assess employment status, classify worker relationships, review wage and working-time records, identify discrimination risks and examine recruitment practices. The programme also covers migrant worker protections, agency and contractor arrangements, union rights, grievance mechanisms, investigations, safeguarding and supplier labour standards. Participants learn to distinguish policy concerns from legal risks, gather reliable evidence and select proportionate remedial actions.
Instructor-led teaching combines concise legal and technical briefings with realistic case analysis, document review, group discussions, investigation simulations and application planning. Cases reflect common issues in banks, public bodies, manufacturers, NGOs, construction projects, hospitality operations and multinational supply chains. Participants leave with a worker-protection control pack containing assessment tools, investigation materials, supplier due diligence prompts and a 90-day improvement plan.
The course is suited to HR, employee relations, compliance, procurement and operational leaders who influence employment conditions directly or through labour suppliers. It is designed for professionals who need practical controls and defensible decision-making rather than specialist legal advice.


