Inclusive Curriculum Design Training Course

Duration 10 days 16 modules · 65 contact hours
Level Intermediate Certificate on completion
Who attends Curriculum Managers, Instructional Designers and others
Fee from USD 2,200 KSh 190,000 for Kenyan organisations
Where 52 cities + online See dates by city
Next start 16 Nov 2026 Course code SD-EM-130

Before you join: Participants should have experience designing, delivering, reviewing or managing education, training or assessment programmes.

Dates & prices

Two start dates a month in every city, and live online on weekdays or weekends. Fees are per participant; classroom fees include tuition, materials, lunch and refreshments, and the certificate.

Suggest a date or city

Showing the next six months. Later dates, other cities and private deliveries for your team are available on request.

Course overview

Curriculum teams are expected to serve learners with different language backgrounds, prior knowledge, disabilities, cultural references, learning preferences and access to technology. Yet many programmes still rely on a single route through content, fixed assessment formats and materials that create unnecessary barriers. Inclusive curriculum design addresses these barriers at the planning stage, helping education providers improve participation, achievement and learner confidence without lowering academic or professional standards.

This course equips participants to design curricula that provide multiple ways to access content, practise skills, demonstrate learning and receive feedback. Participants use Universal Design for Learning, constructive alignment, backward design, Bloom’s taxonomy, differentiation and accessibility standards to review existing provision and build improved curriculum components. The course covers learner profiling, inclusive learning outcomes, accessible materials, culturally responsive content, assessment design, reasonable adjustments, quality assurance and curriculum evaluation.

Teaching combines short technical briefings with curriculum audits, case analysis, group design work, assessment reviews and facilitated critique. Participants apply each method to a real programme, module or qualification from their own setting. By the end of the course, each participant has produced an inclusive curriculum design pack containing a learner profile, aligned outcomes, learning sequence, accessible resource specifications, assessment plan and implementation measures.

The course is suited to professionals responsible for vocational, higher education, corporate learning, public-sector training or NGO capacity-building programmes. It is particularly useful where curriculum teams need practical methods for meeting learner diversity, disability inclusion and equitable assessment requirements.

What you will be able to do

  • Analyse learner diversity using evidence-based learner profiles and barrier mapping
  • Apply Universal Design for Learning to curriculum content, activities and assessment
  • Write measurable inclusive learning outcomes using Bloom’s taxonomy and constructive alignment
  • Design differentiated learning sequences with planned scaffolds, choices and feedback points
  • Create accessible learning materials using WCAG 2.2 and plain-language principles
  • Develop equitable assessment plans using validity, reliability and reasonable-adjustment criteria
  • Audit an existing curriculum against inclusion, accessibility and cultural relevance criteria
  • Produce and present an inclusive curriculum design pack for workplace implementation

Benefits of attending

For you

  • Produce stronger curriculum proposals supported by recognised inclusive design methods
  • Identify avoidable learner barriers before materials and assessments reach delivery
  • Build confidence discussing accessibility, adjustments and equitable assessment with stakeholders
  • Create reusable design specifications for accessible resources and learning activities
  • Present a completed curriculum improvement plan to managers or curriculum committees

For your organisation

  • Reduce curriculum barriers that contribute to disengagement, complaints and avoidable adjustments
  • Improve consistency between intended outcomes, teaching methods and assessment decisions
  • Strengthen evidence for quality reviews, accreditation submissions and inclusion commitments
  • Increase usability of learning materials for multilingual, disabled and remote learners
  • Create implementation-ready curriculum improvements linked to named programme priorities

Course modules

16 modules over 10 days

Participants can explain how curriculum decisions create or reduce barriers to learning.

  • Inclusion, equity and equality distinguished within curriculum planning decisions
  • Social model and medical model implications for learner support
  • Curriculum barriers identified across content, pedagogy, assessment and environment
  • Learner variability treated as an expected design condition
  • Intersectionality considered when interpreting learner participation and achievement patterns
  • Duty of care, reasonable adjustments and academic standards aligned

Participants can construct evidence-based learner profiles that inform curriculum choices.

  • Learner personas built from enrolment, attainment and participation evidence
  • Barrier mapping links learner characteristics with curriculum design decisions
  • Diagnostic assessment identifies prior knowledge, misconceptions and support needs
  • Focus-group protocols gather learner voice without tokenistic consultation
  • Disaggregated data exposes participation gaps across learner groups
  • Assumptions tested against evidence before curriculum changes are specified

Participants can apply Universal Design for Learning principles to planned curriculum components.

  • Universal Design for Learning principles organised around engagement, representation and action
  • Multiple means of engagement reduce avoidable motivational barriers
  • Representation choices support varied sensory, linguistic and cognitive needs
  • Action and expression options preserve standards while widening demonstration routes
  • UDL checkpoints translated into curriculum design requirements
  • Choice architecture balanced with structure, guidance and progression expectations

Participants can align inclusive outcomes, learning evidence and teaching sequences.

  • Backward design starts with evidence of meaningful learner achievement
  • Constructive alignment connects outcomes, activities, feedback and assessment criteria
  • Threshold concepts identify troublesome knowledge requiring additional learning support
  • Programme outcomes mapped to module outcomes and assessment evidence
  • Alignment matrices expose unsupported outcomes and unnecessary assessment tasks
  • Inclusive alignment preserves required standards while varying learning routes

Participants can write observable learning outcomes that avoid unnecessary exclusion.

  • Bloom’s taxonomy selects appropriate cognitive demand for intended learning
  • Action verbs specify observable performance without prescribing one method
  • Conditions and criteria clarify standards for authentic learner performance
  • Inclusive wording separates essential competence from incidental performance demands
  • Outcome statements distinguish knowledge, skill, judgement and professional behaviour
  • Outcome audits identify hidden language, sensory or mobility assumptions

Participants can review and revise content for cultural relevance, representation and bias.

  • Curriculum representation audit examines voices, examples, images and case selections
  • Funds of knowledge inform relevant connections with learner experience
  • Stereotype threat risks reduced through task framing and feedback language
  • Case studies tested for cultural assumptions and deficit narratives
  • Multiple knowledge traditions incorporated without diluting disciplinary evidence standards
  • Content sequencing makes unfamiliar institutional conventions explicit

Participants can design curriculum language supports without reducing subject rigour.

  • Plain-language principles improve instructions, explanations and learner-facing assessment briefs
  • Academic vocabulary selected, sequenced and revisited through retrieval practice
  • Language demands mapped separately from disciplinary knowledge and skill demands
  • Glossaries define technical terms using examples and non-examples
  • Sentence-level scaffolds support multilingual learners during complex written tasks
  • Readability checks identify dense wording, ambiguous instructions and unexplained terminology

Participants can specify accessible formats for digital, print and multimedia materials.

  • WCAG 2.2 principles applied to learning documents and digital resources
  • Heading structures, reading order and descriptive links support screen-reader access
  • Alternative text distinguishes informative, functional and decorative images
  • Colour contrast and non-colour cues communicate meaning accessibly
  • Captions, transcripts and audio description planned for multimedia content
  • Accessible document checklists cover tables, forms, slides and downloadable files

Participants can plan differentiated learning sequences with appropriate scaffolding and choice.

  • Tomlinson differentiation addresses readiness, interest and learner profile
  • Learning progressions sequence prerequisite knowledge before complex performance
  • Scaffolding plans fade prompts as learner independence increases
  • Worked examples reduce extraneous cognitive load during early skill acquisition
  • Flexible grouping uses evidence rather than fixed learner labels
  • Extension pathways deepen application without separating learners unnecessarily

Participants can specify inclusive activity structures that promote participation and psychological safety.

  • Think-pair-share structures preparation time before public contribution
  • Participation protocols distribute voice without forcing personal disclosure
  • Psychological safety supported through response norms and error-friendly routines
  • Active learning tasks offer equivalent roles and contribution formats
  • Sensory and cognitive load considered when planning activity instructions
  • Facilitation prompts challenge bias while maintaining respectful learning dialogue

Participants can design assessment approaches that measure intended learning fairly.

  • Assessment validity examines whether tasks measure intended learning outcomes
  • Reliability risks identified in marking criteria, instructions and assessor judgement
  • Authentic assessment tasks reflect meaningful professional or academic performance
  • Assessment blueprints balance outcomes, cognitive demand and evidence requirements
  • Rubrics describe performance quality using observable, criterion-referenced language
  • Alternative assessment formats tested against essential competence requirements

Participants can distinguish appropriate adjustments from changes to essential assessment standards.

  • Reasonable-adjustment decisions separate access barriers from essential competence requirements
  • Functional impact evidence informs adjustment planning and review
  • Extra time, assistive technology and format changes evaluated systematically
  • Assessment security maintained when alternative arrangements are introduced
  • Adjustment records protect confidentiality while supporting consistent implementation
  • Decision trees document rationale, approvals and review points

Participants can design feedback and support arrangements that sustain learner progress.

  • Feed up, feedback and feed forward structure actionable learner guidance
  • Criterion-referenced feedback identifies next steps against stated performance standards
  • Belonging cues embedded within welcome materials, examples and communications
  • Early-alert indicators trigger timely academic and pastoral support
  • Peer feedback protocols reduce bias and improve response quality
  • Support referral pathways clarify roles between teaching and specialist services

Participants can conduct a structured audit of curriculum inclusion and accessibility.

  • Curriculum audit criteria cover access, representation, participation and assessment
  • Equality impact assessment identifies foreseeable differential effects before implementation
  • Document sampling tests consistency across modules, materials and assessment briefs
  • Learner journey mapping locates friction points from enrolment through completion
  • Quality indicators combine learner data, observation evidence and stakeholder feedback
  • Prioritisation matrices rank improvements by impact, effort and implementation risk

Participants can plan feasible curriculum changes with clear ownership and review measures.

  • RACI matrices assign curriculum redesign responsibilities and decision rights
  • Implementation roadmaps sequence pilots, approvals, production and staff development
  • Stakeholder analysis anticipates concerns from faculty, learners and quality teams
  • Change communications explain standards, benefits, expectations and support available
  • Resource plans estimate time, expertise, technology and accessibility costs
  • Success measures track access, participation, attainment and learner experience

Participants can build, review and present a complete inclusive curriculum design pack for an identified programme.

  • Programme scope defined through learner evidence, outcomes and organisational requirements
  • Barrier analysis prioritises curriculum issues requiring immediate design action
  • Aligned learning sequence specifies content, activities, scaffolds and learner choices
  • Accessible resource specifications address formats, language, media and technology
  • Assessment plan documents validity, criteria, adjustments and feedback arrangements
  • Peer review applies audit criteria before final stakeholder presentation

Exercises and examples are adapted to each cohort's sectors and roles.

What you take back to work

  1. Inclusive curriculum audit template
  2. Learner profile and barrier-mapping canvas
  3. Constructive alignment matrix
  4. Accessible learning materials checklist
  5. Equitable assessment blueprint
  6. Inclusive curriculum design pack

Who should attend

  • Curriculum Managers — responsible for programme quality, consistency and learner outcomes
  • Instructional Designers — build learning journeys, materials and assessment approaches
  • Education Programme Managers — oversee delivery across diverse learner populations
  • Teachers and Trainers — adapt curriculum plans for mixed-ability groups
  • Assessment Managers — improve fairness, validity and reasonable-adjustment processes
  • Learning and Development Managers — commission inclusive workforce development programmes

Skills and tools covered

Inclusive curriculum planningLearner barrier analysisAccessible material designEquitable assessment designConstructive alignmentCurriculum quality assurance

Tools and standards

Universal Design for Learning Guidelines, Bloom’s Taxonomy, Constructive Alignment, WCAG 2.2

How the course runs

Training methodology

The course uses short instructor briefings to introduce each design method, followed by case work drawn from vocational education, universities, public-sector academies and workplace learning. Participants review curriculum extracts, identify barriers, compare alternative design choices and receive structured peer critique. Group exercises test learner journeys, assessment decisions and accessible material specifications. Simulations address conversations about reasonable adjustments and competing stakeholder requirements. Application planning runs throughout the course, allowing participants to build and refine a real curriculum design pack.

Requirements and prerequisites

Participants should have experience designing, delivering, reviewing or managing education, training or assessment programmes. They should be familiar with learning outcomes, session plans or assessment tasks and able to bring an existing programme, module or course outline for application. Experience of supporting learners with disabilities, multilingual learners or disadvantaged groups is useful but not required. The course does not require specialist qualifications in special education, instructional design, accessibility testing or psychometrics. Participants do not need prior knowledge of Universal Design for Learning or WCAG standards.

A typical training day

08:30 – 10:30First session
10:30 – 10:45Refreshment break
10:45 – 12:30Second session
12:30 – 13:30Lunch and networking
13:30 – 15:00Third session
15:00 – 15:15Refreshment break
15:15 – 16:30Workshop and daily review

Live online deliveries follow the same structure in East Africa Time, with shorter screen blocks and longer breaks.

What the fee includes

  • Instruction by a practitioner facilitator
  • Full course workbook and materials
  • Exercise files, templates and case studies
  • Refreshments and lunch on classroom deliveries
  • Certificate of completion
  • Post-course application plan

Frequently asked questions

Participants should understand the basic purpose of learning outcomes, course plans or assessments and have some involvement in education or training. Specialist experience in disability support, accessibility or instructional design is not required.

Participants should bring an existing course outline, module specification, assessment brief or learning materials where possible. This gives them a real programme component to analyse and improve during the course.

The course suits curriculum managers, instructional designers, teachers, trainers, assessment staff and learning managers. It applies to vocational, academic, professional, public-sector and workplace learning settings.

Disability awareness courses usually focus on attitudes, legal duties and learner support. This course focuses on redesigning outcomes, materials, learning activities and assessments so fewer barriers arise in the first place.

Participants leave with an inclusive curriculum design pack based on a real programme or module. The pack can be used to brief curriculum teams, support quality reviews, commission materials or plan a redesign project.

The first week establishes learner analysis, inclusive design principles, alignment and accessible materials. The second week concentrates on differentiated teaching, equitable assessment, quality assurance, implementation planning and the final capstone presentation.

Questions about this course?

Ask about dates, fees, group bookings or running it for your team. Our training team replies by email.