Leadership Mediation Skills Training Course

Duration 5 days 10 modules · 33 contact hours
Level Intermediate Certificate on completion
Who attends People Managers, Senior Leaders and others
Fee from USD 1,100 KSh 95,000 for Kenyan organisations
Where 52 cities + online See dates by city
Next start 16 Nov 2026 Course code SD-LD-261

Before you join: Participants should have experience leading people, projects, services or stakeholder relationships and should expect to address disagreement as part of their role.

Dates & prices

Two start dates a month in every city, and live online on weekdays or weekends. Fees are per participant; classroom fees include tuition, materials, lunch and refreshments, and the certificate.

Suggest a date or city

Showing the next six months. Later dates, other cities and private deliveries for your team are available on request.

Course overview

Leaders are often asked to resolve disputes between colleagues, teams, suppliers or stakeholders while remaining accountable for performance, relationships and fair process. Informal intervention can fail when managers move too quickly to solutions, take sides, confuse mediation with discipline, or avoid difficult conversations until positions harden. This course equips leaders to manage workplace conflict constructively before it damages delivery, retention, safety or customer outcomes.

Participants learn a structured mediation process for preparing, opening, diagnosing issues, conducting private meetings, facilitating joint discussion and recording workable agreements. They practise separating positions from interests, questioning without cross-examining, reframing inflammatory language, managing power differences and testing proposed solutions against operational needs. The course also addresses the leader's dual role: when to mediate, when to manage directly, and when to refer matters involving misconduct, grievance, safeguarding, discrimination or formal investigation.

Teaching combines concise instructor briefings with realistic mediation cases, paired skills practice, group analysis and facilitated simulations. Cases reflect situations such as delivery disputes between business units, conflict after a restructuring, performance tensions between a manager and specialist, and disagreements involving external partners. Participants receive feedback against clear behavioural criteria and build a practical mediation toolkit. They leave with a prepared mediation process plan, question sets, agreement templates and an escalation decision guide for use in their own workplace.

The course suits managers and leaders who regularly address disagreement but are not employed as full-time workplace mediators. It is particularly useful for people leaders, project and programme managers, operational managers, HR business partners and senior technical professionals leading cross-functional work.

What you will be able to do

  • Assess whether a workplace dispute is suitable for informal mediation, management action or formal referral
  • Prepare a mediation using stakeholder analysis, issue mapping and confidentiality boundaries
  • Conduct opening meetings that establish neutrality, ground rules and informed participation
  • Use active listening, reframing and calibrated questions to identify underlying interests
  • Facilitate joint discussions that convert accusations into specific issues for resolution
  • Manage power imbalances, strong emotion and impasse using structured mediation interventions
  • Draft clear workplace agreements with actions, owners, deadlines and review arrangements
  • Create a personal mediation application plan for recurring conflicts in the participant's role

Benefits of attending

For you

  • Handle difficult conversations with a repeatable mediation structure
  • Reduce anxiety when conflict becomes emotional or personally charged
  • Build credibility as a fair and impartial manager
  • Recognise when informal resolution is unsafe or inappropriate
  • Document agreements that withstand follow-up scrutiny

For your organisation

  • Resolve operational disputes before they disrupt delivery or customer service
  • Reduce avoidable escalation into grievances, complaints and formal investigations
  • Improve accountability through documented actions and review dates
  • Retain skilled employees by addressing relationship breakdowns earlier
  • Strengthen consistent manager practice across conflict and employee relations cases

Course modules

10 modules over 5 days

Participants can distinguish mediation from management action, coaching, investigation and formal grievance processes.

  • Conflict costs measured through delivery delays, absenteeism, turnover and customer impact
  • Leader roles distinguished: mediator, manager, sponsor, investigator and decision-maker
  • Early intervention triggers before positions harden or communication stops
  • Informal resolution boundaries within conduct, grievance and safeguarding procedures
  • Mediation suitability assessed using risk, consent, authority and relationship factors
  • Referral routes identified for discrimination, harassment, safety and criminal allegations

Participants can analyse a dispute and prepare an impartial, purposeful mediation process.

  • Conflict mapping separates people, issues, interests, history and organisational constraints
  • Thomas-Kilmann modes explain competing, avoiding, accommodating, compromising and collaborating responses
  • Stakeholder analysis identifies affected parties, decision rights and informal influence
  • Positions translated into underlying interests, needs, concerns and fears
  • Prepare confidential pre-meeting questions for each participant
  • Scope statements define issues addressed, authority limits and intended outcomes

Participants can establish fair process, confidentiality limits and credible neutrality.

  • Neutrality distinguished from agreement, passivity and false equivalence
  • Confidentiality explained with exceptions for safety, misconduct and legal obligations
  • Informed participation secured through purpose, process, choices and consequences
  • Power imbalances assessed across hierarchy, expertise, identity and access
  • Ground rules set for interruptions, respectful language and private information
  • Mediator bias checked through assumptions, alliances and preferred outcomes

Participants can surface concerns accurately and convert charged statements into discussable issues.

  • Active listening uses attending, paraphrasing, summarising and emotion labelling
  • Open questions uncover events, impact, assumptions, needs and requested changes
  • Calibrated questions invite problem-solving without assigning blame or demanding agreement
  • Reframing converts accusations into neutral, future-focused discussion topics
  • Ladder of Inference exposes data selection, interpretation and untested conclusions
  • Silence used deliberately to allow reflection and fuller responses

Participants can open a mediation meeting with clarity, authority and participant ownership.

  • Opening statements explain mediator role, purpose, boundaries and voluntary participation
  • Agenda design sequences issues from shared facts to contested priorities
  • Process contracts establish speaking order, breaks, confidentiality and decision authority
  • Each participant presents concerns without interruption or immediate rebuttal
  • Summaries test shared understanding before moving into joint problem definition
  • Timeboxes maintain progress while protecting meaningful participation and reflection

Participants can use separate and joint conversations to prepare productive resolution discussions.

  • Private meetings clarify interests, test options and assess readiness
  • Caucus confidentiality managed through explicit permission before sharing information
  • Joint dialogue focuses parties on observable events and operational consequences
  • Reality-testing questions examine feasibility, risks, authority and likely responses
  • Common ground identified without minimising material differences or legitimate concerns
  • Conversation loops return unresolved issues to agreed facts and interests

Participants can respond constructively when discussions become emotional, defensive or unproductive.

  • Emotional flooding recognised through escalation, withdrawal, repetition and personal attacks
  • De-escalation uses naming emotion, slowing pace and restoring behavioural boundaries
  • Defensiveness addressed by separating intent, impact and future responsibility
  • Power-balancing options include preparation, support persons, breaks and separate meetings
  • Resistance explored through ambivalence, perceived loss, status concerns and mistrust
  • SCARF domains identify status, certainty, autonomy, relatedness and fairness threats

Participants can facilitate practical options and help parties reach durable workplace agreements.

  • Principled negotiation separates people from problems and focuses interests
  • Option generation postpones evaluation until multiple workable choices exist
  • Objective criteria test proposals against policy, data, standards and precedent
  • Trade-offs compare workload, timing, authority, resources and acceptable risk
  • Agreement terms specify actions, owners, deadlines, evidence and review points
  • Contingency clauses define responses when agreed actions cannot be completed

Participants can address deadlock, close a mediation responsibly and select next steps.

  • Impasse diagnosed as information gaps, trust deficits, incompatible interests or authority limits
  • Breaks used to reduce pressure and reassess options privately
  • BATNA analysis clarifies alternatives if voluntary agreement is not reached
  • Mediator proposals distinguished from managerial decisions and imposed settlements
  • Escalation decisions document unresolved issues, risks and appropriate referral routes
  • Closure conversations confirm commitments, follow-up contact and communication boundaries

Participants can apply a repeatable mediation approach to conflicts within their own responsibilities.

  • Personal conflict triggers identified through recent workplace dispute reflection
  • Mediation preparation plan built for a current or anticipated conflict
  • Question bank selected for diagnosis, reframing, reality-testing and closure
  • Stakeholder communication plan protects confidentiality while maintaining accountability
  • Follow-up reviews assess compliance, relationship repair and emerging risks
  • Thirty-day application plan assigns actions, support and practice opportunities

Exercises and examples are adapted to each cohort's sectors and roles.

What you take back to work

  1. Workplace mediation suitability checklist
  2. Conflict mapping template
  3. Mediation preparation and opening script
  4. Reframing and questioning question bank
  5. Workplace agreement record template
  6. Thirty-day mediation application plan

Who should attend

  • People Managers — resolve team conflict before it becomes a formal employee relations issue
  • Senior Leaders — handle cross-functional disputes while protecting delivery and working relationships
  • HR Business Partners — support early resolution and make appropriate formal referrals
  • Project Managers — address competing priorities, roles and decisions across project stakeholders
  • Operations Managers — contain disputes affecting service levels, safety or workforce coordination
  • Technical and Professional Leads — lead difficult conversations without relying on positional authority

Skills and tools covered

Workplace mediationConflict diagnosisActive listeningInterest-based negotiationDifficult conversationsAgreement drafting

Tools and standards

Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument, Ladder of Inference, SCARF model, Principled Negotiation

How the course runs

Training methodology

The course uses short instructor briefings to introduce each stage of workplace mediation, followed by case analysis, group exercises, paired practice and facilitated simulations. Participants prepare and conduct mediation conversations in realistic leadership scenarios, receiving structured feedback on listening, questioning, neutrality, reframing and agreement-building. Discussion connects the techniques to participants' own policies, authority limits and escalation routes. The final application-planning work converts the methods into actions for current or likely workplace conflicts.

Requirements and prerequisites

Participants should have experience leading people, projects, services or stakeholder relationships and should expect to address disagreement as part of their role. Familiarity with their employer's basic HR, grievance, conduct and escalation procedures is useful, as participants will apply these boundaries during the course. No previous mediation qualification, legal training, counselling background or formal dispute-resolution experience is required. This is not a course for handling criminal allegations, safeguarding cases, formal disciplinary investigations or legal disputes requiring specialist advice.

A typical training day

08:30 – 10:30First session
10:30 – 10:45Refreshment break
10:45 – 12:30Second session
12:30 – 13:30Lunch and networking
13:30 – 15:00Third session
15:00 – 15:15Refreshment break
15:15 – 16:30Workshop and daily review

Live online deliveries follow the same structure in East Africa Time, with shorter screen blocks and longer breaks.

What the fee includes

  • Instruction by a practitioner facilitator
  • Full course workbook and materials
  • Exercise files, templates and case studies
  • Refreshments and lunch on classroom deliveries
  • Certificate of completion
  • Post-course application plan

Frequently asked questions

Participants should have experience managing people, projects or stakeholders and some exposure to workplace disagreement. No prior mediation qualification or legal training is required.

Participants should bring details of a current or typical workplace conflict, with names and sensitive information removed. They should also bring relevant internal policies on conduct, grievances, complaints or escalation where available.

It is designed for managers, senior leaders, HR business partners, project managers and professional leads who need to address conflict as part of their role. It is not designed as qualification training for full-time professional mediators.

Difficult conversations courses focus primarily on one-to-one communication, while negotiation courses focus on reaching a deal between parties. This course teaches a leader to structure a fair process between disputing parties, manage neutrality and record agreed actions.

Participants can use the suitability checklist, conflict map, pre-meeting questions and agreement record in live workplace situations. The course also clarifies when a leader should stop informal resolution and refer the matter through formal channels.

The five days provide approximately 32.5 contact hours, running from 08:30 to 16:30 each day. Time is divided across ten taught modules, with short briefings, case work, group exercises, simulations, feedback and application planning.

Questions about this course?

Ask about dates, fees, group bookings or running it for your team. Our training team replies by email.