Political and Administrative Alignment Training Course

Duration 5 days 10 modules · 33 contact hours
Level Intermediate Certificate on completion
Who attends Senior civil servants, Ministry directors and others
Fee from USD 1,100 KSh 95,000 for Kenyan organisations
Where 52 cities + online See dates by city
Next start 16 Nov 2026 Course code SD-GPS-087

Before you join: Participants should have at least two years of experience in government, a public agency, a state-owned entity, a development organisation or a programme working directly with public institutions.

Dates & prices

Two start dates a month in every city, and live online on weekdays or weekends. Fees are per participant; classroom fees include tuition, materials, lunch and refreshments, and the certificate.

Suggest a date or city

Showing the next six months. Later dates, other cities and private deliveries for your team are available on request.

Course overview

Political leaders set public priorities, make choices under scrutiny and answer to citizens. Senior administrators convert those choices into lawful, funded and deliverable programmes while protecting continuity, evidence quality and institutional integrity. When these roles are poorly aligned, governments face stalled decisions, unclear accountability, conflicting public messages, politicised administration and weak implementation. The consequences can include delayed infrastructure, ineffective humanitarian response, budget overruns and loss of public trust.

This course examines how political office holders, senior civil servants, agency leaders and programme managers can work productively within their distinct mandates. Participants examine constitutional and statutory authority, ministerial responsibility, civil-service neutrality, decision rights, cabinet processes, policy advice, budget alignment, stakeholder management and public accountability. They use RACI and RAPID to clarify who recommends, decides, executes and assures major initiatives. The course also addresses difficult areas including political pressure, contested evidence, interagency conflict, transitions of government and communication during crises.

Teaching combines focused instructor briefings with public-sector cases, facilitated group analysis, role-based simulations and structured application planning. Cases reflect issues faced by ministries, regulators, municipalities, public agencies and development programmes, including emergency relief coordination, health-policy implementation and public-investment delivery. Participants leave with a political-administrative alignment action plan, decision-rights model, stakeholder analysis and governance improvement checklist that can be adapted to a live institutional priority.

The course is designed for experienced public-sector and development professionals who work at the boundary between political direction and administrative delivery. It is particularly useful where major reforms, decentralisation, donor-funded programmes or leadership transitions require clearer authority, faster coordination and defensible public decisions.

What you will be able to do

  • Map constitutional, statutory and delegated authority affecting a public-sector initiative
  • Distinguish political direction from administrative responsibility using decision-rights analysis
  • Build a RACI matrix for cross-ministerial policy and programme delivery
  • Apply the RAPID framework to resolve delayed or contested executive decisions
  • Prepare evidence-based policy advice that records options, risks and implementation implications
  • Design stakeholder engagement plans for politically sensitive public programmes
  • Assess integrity, conflict-of-interest and accountability risks in political-administrative interactions
  • Produce a political-administrative alignment action plan for a live workplace priority

Benefits of attending

For you

  • Greater confidence advising political leaders without crossing administrative boundaries
  • Clearer methods for handling conflicting instructions and ambiguous accountability
  • Stronger written policy advice for senior decision makers
  • Practical language for addressing politicisation and integrity concerns
  • A reusable plan for improving collaboration with ministers, agencies and partners

For your organisation

  • Faster decisions through documented authority and escalation routes
  • Reduced duplication between ministerial offices, departments and delivery agencies
  • More defensible policy choices supported by evidence, records and risk analysis
  • Improved continuity during elections, cabinet reshuffles and leadership changes
  • Stronger implementation of public programmes requiring interagency coordination

Course modules

10 modules over 5 days

Participants can distinguish lawful political direction from administrative authority and professional responsibility.

  • Constitutional, statutory and administrative sources of authority in public decisions
  • Ministerial responsibility, civil-service neutrality and the permanence principle
  • Distinguishing policy direction from administrative execution using decision-rights maps
  • Formal mandates translated into accountable roles, powers and reporting lines
  • Westminster and presidential arrangements: implications for political-administrative relations
  • Identifying informal influence channels without confusing them with lawful authority

Participants can design decision routes that assign authority, consultation and accountability clearly.

  • RACI matrices for ministerial, departmental, agency and programme responsibilities
  • RAPID decision roles: recommend, agree, perform, input and decide
  • Decision logs capturing authority, evidence, dissent and implementation commitments
  • Escalation thresholds for stalled decisions, legal concerns and budget variance
  • Delegation instruments defining limits, conditions and reporting requirements
  • Separating consultation obligations from approval rights and veto powers

Participants can prepare policy advice that respects political priorities while presenting evidence and risks.

  • Policy-cycle stages linked to political priorities and administrative deliverables
  • Problem definition distinguishing symptoms, causes, affected groups and constraints
  • Options analysis comparing outcomes, cost, legality, feasibility and political acceptability
  • Briefing-note structure: recommendation, rationale, risks, decisions and next steps
  • Evidence hierarchies for administrative data, evaluations, research and consultation
  • Recording dissenting advice while preserving collective responsibility and professional candour

Participants can connect political commitments to funded, sequenced and accountable implementation arrangements.

  • Results chains linking political commitments, outputs, outcomes and public value
  • Medium-term expenditure frameworks aligned with policy priorities and delivery capacity
  • Implementation roadmaps defining milestones, owners, dependencies and decision gates
  • Public-investment appraisal using cost-benefit analysis and distributional impact assessment
  • Portfolio reviews identifying unfunded mandates, duplication and delivery bottlenecks
  • Performance indicators separating political promises from measurable administrative accountabilities

Participants can establish coordination arrangements for initiatives spanning multiple public institutions.

  • Coordination charters setting purpose, membership, authority and meeting cadence
  • Joint workplans connecting ministry, agency, municipal and partner responsibilities
  • Dependency mapping for approvals, procurement, data sharing and field delivery
  • Secretariat functions supporting agendas, records, follow-up and issue escalation
  • Memoranda of understanding covering roles, resources, information and dispute resolution
  • Cabinet committee submissions structured around choices, trade-offs and implementation readiness

Participants can analyse stakeholder interests and build communication approaches that support legitimate implementation.

  • Power-interest grids identifying supporters, blockers, affected groups and brokers
  • Stakeholder salience assessed through power, legitimacy and urgency
  • Political economy analysis of incentives, rents, alliances and institutional constraints
  • Consultation plans differentiating information, consultation, partnership and delegated authority
  • Message houses connecting policy intent, evidence, benefits and anticipated concerns
  • Managing public commitments when operational evidence requires revised implementation assumptions

Participants can identify and respond to integrity risks arising in political-administrative relationships.

  • OECD public integrity principles applied to leadership, merit and accountability
  • Conflict-of-interest declarations, recusals and registers for public decision makers
  • Merit-based appointment safeguards and risks of patronage in administration
  • Political instruction versus improper interference: documenting boundaries and responses
  • Procurement integrity controls for politically visible programmes and emergency contracts
  • Protected disclosure channels, retaliation safeguards and investigation referral routes

Participants can handle disagreements and transitions without compromising continuity, legality or trust.

  • Interest-based negotiation separating positions, interests, options and objective criteria
  • Conflict mapping of issues, actors, relationships, triggers and possible settlements
  • Difficult-conversation preparation using facts, impacts, requests and agreed boundaries
  • Transition briefings preserving institutional memory, pending decisions and delivery risks
  • Caretaker conventions and continuity arrangements during electoral or leadership transitions
  • Scenario planning for policy reversal, cabinet reshuffle and sudden crisis

Participants can establish accountable political-administrative coordination during fast-moving public emergencies.

  • Incident command structures defining strategic, operational and tactical responsibilities
  • Emergency decision protocols balancing speed, legality, transparency and proportionality
  • Humanitarian coordination roles among government, donors, United Nations and NGOs
  • Situation reports integrating operational facts, needs, decisions and resource gaps
  • Crisis communication approvals preventing contradictory ministerial and administrative messages
  • After-action reviews capturing decisions, failures, lessons and corrective actions

Participants can produce a practical plan to strengthen alignment around a priority public initiative.

  • Diagnostic baseline covering mandates, decision rights, relationships and delivery constraints
  • Priority issue selection using impact, urgency, feasibility and sponsor commitment
  • Alignment action plan with actions, owners, dates, dependencies and measures
  • Risk register covering political, legal, operational, financial and reputational exposures
  • Thirty-sixty-ninety-day milestones for implementation, review and course correction
  • Senior sponsor briefing presenting proposed governance changes and required decisions

Exercises and examples are adapted to each cohort's sectors and roles.

What you take back to work

  1. Political-administrative decision-rights map
  2. RACI and RAPID governance template
  3. Evidence-based policy briefing-note template
  4. Interagency coordination charter
  5. Political stakeholder and risk analysis
  6. Ninety-day alignment action plan

Who should attend

  • Senior civil servants — clarify responsibilities when translating ministerial priorities into delivery
  • Ministry directors — coordinate policy, budgets and implementation across departmental boundaries
  • Special advisers and political staff — work effectively with permanent administrative structures
  • Public agency executives — manage mandates, oversight relationships and ministerial expectations
  • Development programme managers — align government counterparts, donors and implementing partners
  • Local government leaders — balance elected direction with professional administrative management

Skills and tools covered

Decision-rights designPolicy advicePolitical stakeholder analysisInteragency coordinationPublic-sector integrityImplementation governance

Tools and standards

RACI matrix, RAPID decision framework, PESTLE analysis, OECD Recommendation on Public Integrity

How the course runs

Training methodology

The course uses short instructor briefings to establish public-sector concepts, followed by case analysis, facilitated group work and role-based simulations. Participants examine realistic ministerial, agency and development-programme decisions where authority, evidence and delivery pressures conflict. They practise mapping decision rights, drafting concise advice, handling escalation and agreeing coordination arrangements. Structured reflection connects each method to participants’ institutions. The final application-planning work converts course outputs into specific actions, owners, milestones and review points.

Requirements and prerequisites

Participants should have at least two years of experience in government, a public agency, a state-owned entity, a development organisation or a programme working directly with public institutions. Familiarity with basic public-policy processes, organisational reporting lines and government budgeting is helpful. Participants should be prepared to discuss a current policy, service-delivery or reform challenge without disclosing confidential information. No legal qualification, political-office experience, prior management training or specialist knowledge of a particular country’s constitutional system is required.

A typical training day

08:30 – 10:30First session
10:30 – 10:45Refreshment break
10:45 – 12:30Second session
12:30 – 13:30Lunch and networking
13:30 – 15:00Third session
15:00 – 15:15Refreshment break
15:15 – 16:30Workshop and daily review

Live online deliveries follow the same structure in East Africa Time, with shorter screen blocks and longer breaks.

What the fee includes

  • Instruction by a practitioner facilitator
  • Full course workbook and materials
  • Exercise files, templates and case studies
  • Refreshments and lunch on classroom deliveries
  • Certificate of completion
  • Post-course application plan

Frequently asked questions

Participants should have practical exposure to government, public agencies, development programmes or work with public institutions. The course assumes familiarity with organisational reporting lines and public-service processes, but it does not require legal training or previous political-office experience.

Bring a non-confidential example of a policy, reform, service-delivery initiative or coordination problem from your work. Participants can use this example to develop decision-rights, stakeholder and action-planning outputs.

It suits senior civil servants, ministry directors, agency managers, special advisers, local government leaders and development professionals working with government counterparts. It is most useful for people responsible for turning public commitments into coordinated action.

Public policy courses often focus on policy formulation, while public administration courses may focus on systems and management. This course concentrates on the working relationship between political direction and administrative delivery, including authority, advice, integrity and coordination.

Participants can use the RACI, RAPID, briefing-note and coordination-charter formats with an active initiative. The final action plan identifies practical changes to roles, escalation routes, stakeholder engagement and governance meetings.

The five-day programme provides about 32.5 contact hours, normally from 08:30 to 16:30 each day. Time is divided between instructor input, case work, group analysis, simulations and development of workplace application materials.

Questions about this course?

Ask about dates, fees, group bookings or running it for your team. Our training team replies by email.