Self-Managing Teams Training Course

Duration 5 days 10 modules · 33 contact hours
Level Intermediate Certificate on completion
Who attends Team Leaders, Operational Managers and others
Fee from USD 1,100 KSh 95,000 for Kenyan organisations
Where 52 cities + online See dates by city
Next start 16 Nov 2026 Course code SD-LD-221

Before you join: Participants should have experience working in, supervising or supporting a team with shared deliverables.

Dates & prices

Two start dates a month in every city, and live online on weekdays or weekends. Fees are per participant; classroom fees include tuition, materials, lunch and refreshments, and the certificate.

Suggest a date or city

Showing the next six months. Later dates, other cities and private deliveries for your team are available on request.

Course overview

Self-managing teams can respond quickly to customer needs, operational incidents and changing priorities without waiting for repeated managerial approval. They also fail when authority is vague, roles overlap, performance information is withheld, or teams are expected to solve issues beyond their control. Managers must create the conditions for distributed decision-making while retaining appropriate oversight, risk controls and escalation routes.

This course shows leaders, team managers and experienced team members how to design and lead effective self-managing teams. Participants examine team purpose, decision rights, role clarity, operating agreements, visual workflow management, peer accountability and conflict resolution. They use practical methods including RACI, Kanban, PDCA and structured decision protocols to establish clear ways of working. The course also addresses the manager's changing role: setting direction, providing resources, coaching performance and intervening without taking back routine decisions.

Teaching combines focused briefings with case work, team design activities, simulations and facilitated discussion. Cases reflect common settings such as bank operations, public-service delivery, project teams, customer service centres and technical support functions. Participants work on a current or planned team context and leave with a self-management implementation pack containing a team charter, decision-rights map, operating agreements, performance dashboard and 90-day action plan.

The course is suited to organisations introducing team-based operating models, improving frontline problem-solving, or reducing avoidable approval delays. It is particularly useful where teams must coordinate work across functions while meeting service, quality, regulatory or safety requirements.

What you will be able to do

  • Assess team readiness for self-management using capability, authority and support criteria
  • Design a team charter defining purpose, boundaries, accountabilities and stakeholder commitments
  • Allocate decision rights using RACI and agreed escalation thresholds
  • Establish operating agreements for meetings, workflow, communication and peer accountability
  • Use Kanban and team metrics to manage work visibility, flow and service performance
  • Facilitate structured team decisions using consent, consultation and decision-owner protocols
  • Address conflict and performance issues through feedback, mediation and peer review methods
  • Produce a 90-day implementation plan for introducing or strengthening self-management

Benefits of attending

For you

  • A practical method for reducing unnecessary managerial intervention
  • Clearer techniques for assigning authority without creating accountability gaps
  • Improved confidence in facilitating peer-led decisions and difficult discussions
  • Reusable tools for making team workload and performance visible
  • A documented plan for developing a more self-managing team

For your organisation

  • Faster resolution of routine operational decisions at team level
  • Reduced approval bottlenecks for customer, service and process issues
  • Clearer accountability between managers, teams and supporting functions
  • Earlier identification of workflow delays, quality risks and capacity constraints
  • More consistent team practices during growth, restructuring or manager transitions

Course modules

10 modules over 5 days

Participants can assess whether a team has the conditions required for self-management.

  • Self-management defined through authority, accountability, interdependence and boundary conditions
  • Conditions distinguishing self-managing teams from delegated work groups
  • Team purpose translated into customer, operational and improvement outcomes
  • Task interdependence mapped using pooled, sequential and reciprocal workflow patterns
  • Authority boundaries set through decisions, constraints and escalation thresholds
  • Psychological safety distinguished from comfort, consensus and absence of challenge
  • Readiness assessed across skills, information, trust and leadership support

Participants can define a clear mandate that guides team decisions and stakeholder expectations.

  • Team charters linking purpose, customers, outputs, boundaries and success measures
  • Core services separated from improvement work and discretionary activities
  • Stakeholder expectations identified through service-level and relationship mapping
  • Inputs, outputs and hand-offs mapped across the team workflow
  • Non-negotiable controls documented for risk, safety, compliance and quality
  • Escalation triggers specified for exceptions exceeding team authority
  • Charter review cycles aligned with operational and strategic changes

Participants can allocate roles and decision rights without creating duplication or gaps.

  • RACI matrices applied to recurring decisions, deliverables and approvals
  • Decision ownership separated from consultation, execution and final accountability
  • Role cards define responsibilities, skills, authority and expected contributions
  • Shared leadership roles assigned for facilitation, coordination and improvement
  • Delegation levels matched to risk, competence and decision reversibility
  • Authority conflicts resolved through explicit priority and escalation rules
  • Accountability maintained when responsibilities rotate among team members

Participants can establish practical agreements for routine coordination and governance.

  • Working agreements establish behavioural standards, response times and communication channels
  • Meeting architecture separates daily coordination, reviews and improvement discussions
  • Standing agendas connect operational data, decisions, actions and unresolved issues
  • Decision logs record owners, rationale, deadlines and review dates
  • Consent decisions used when objections identify material operational risk
  • Team norms address attendance, preparation, interruptions and information sharing
  • Governance rhythms link team reviews with manager and stakeholder forums

Participants can use visual management to coordinate work, capacity and priorities.

  • Kanban boards visualise demand, work stages, blockers and completed outputs
  • Work-in-progress limits reduce overload, hidden queues and unfinished tasks
  • Service classes distinguish urgent, fixed-date, standard and improvement work
  • Daily flow reviews identify bottlenecks, ageing work and capacity constraints
  • Pull systems replace individual task allocation where workflow conditions permit
  • Capacity planning accounts for demand patterns, absences and specialist availability
  • Operational dashboards combine throughput, quality, timeliness and customer measures

Participants can select and run decision processes suited to the issue and risk level.

  • Decision protocols match urgency, impact, expertise and stakeholder involvement
  • Consultative decisions gather input before a named owner decides
  • Advice process requirements protect expertise without creating approval bottlenecks
  • Consensus distinguished from consent, consultation and majority voting
  • A3 problem-solving structures facts, root causes, countermeasures and follow-up
  • Five Whys and fishbone diagrams test assumptions behind recurring problems
  • PDCA cycles convert team learning into controlled process improvements

Participants can build peer accountability while maintaining fair performance standards.

  • Peer accountability links visible commitments, standards, evidence and follow-through
  • Team scorecards connect individual contributions with shared service outcomes
  • Behavioural expectations translated into observable actions and review criteria
  • After-action reviews identify intended results, actual results and lessons
  • Commitment tracking clarifies owners, due dates, dependencies and completion evidence
  • Performance concerns addressed early through facts, impact and agreed actions
  • Manager interventions distinguish coaching needs from formal performance procedures

Participants can address disagreement and interpersonal tensions without avoiding accountability.

  • Thomas-Kilmann conflict modes compared against relationship and task requirements
  • Interest-based dialogue separates positions from underlying needs and constraints
  • SBI feedback structures observations, impact and requested behavioural change
  • Difficult conversations prepared using facts, assumptions, emotions and desired outcomes
  • Mediation steps establish ground rules, interests, options and commitments
  • Conflict escalation distinguished from productive disagreement about work quality
  • Repair conversations rebuild trust after missed commitments or harmful behaviour

Participants can adapt managerial leadership to support autonomy without abandoning oversight.

  • Manager roles shift from task allocation toward direction, coaching and resourcing
  • Coaching questions develop judgement without supplying premature answers
  • Situational leadership matches guidance levels to competence and commitment
  • Control points monitor outcomes, risk indicators and boundary compliance
  • Sponsor support removes cross-functional barriers beyond team authority
  • Intervention criteria distinguish coaching moments from necessary managerial decisions
  • Information transparency enables teams to interpret performance and make trade-offs

Participants can plan a phased introduction of self-management with review measures and safeguards.

  • Implementation roadmaps sequence chartering, role design, routines and capability building
  • Pilot scope selected using manageable risk, clear demand and leadership support
  • Stakeholder communication plans explain changed decisions, interfaces and escalation routes
  • Training needs identified for technical, interpersonal and facilitation capabilities
  • Baseline measures establish current service, quality, cost and engagement performance
  • Thirty-, sixty- and ninety-day reviews test adoption barriers and results
  • Improvement backlogs prioritise operating changes using impact and effort criteria

Exercises and examples are adapted to each cohort's sectors and roles.

What you take back to work

  1. Self-managing team readiness assessment
  2. Team charter template
  3. RACI decision-rights matrix
  4. Team operating agreements checklist
  5. Visual workflow and performance dashboard model
  6. 90-day self-management implementation plan

Who should attend

  • Team Leaders — need to shift from directing work to enabling team ownership
  • Operational Managers — need faster frontline decisions while retaining control standards
  • Project Managers — need clear authority and coordination across cross-functional teams
  • Service Delivery Managers — need teams to resolve customer and process issues directly
  • HR Business Partners — need practical structures supporting accountability and team development
  • Experienced Team Members — need skills for shared decisions, peer feedback and coordination

Skills and tools covered

Team operating designDistributed decision-makingPeer accountabilityWorkflow visualisationConflict resolutionCoaching leadership

Tools and standards

RACI matrix, Kanban, PDCA cycle, Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument

How the course runs

Training methodology

The course uses short instructor briefings to introduce team design principles and named management methods. Participants analyse realistic operational cases, assess self-management readiness and build components for a team they know. Group exercises test decision-rights maps, operating agreements and escalation routes. Simulations rehearse peer accountability, conflict conversations and manager interventions. Facilitated review connects each method to service, risk and performance requirements. Participants consolidate their work into a practical 90-day application plan.

Requirements and prerequisites

Participants should have experience working in, supervising or supporting a team with shared deliverables. Familiarity with basic performance measures, meeting routines and workplace problem-solving is useful. Managers should be able to describe a current team structure and recurring decisions; team members should understand their own responsibilities and hand-offs. No prior study of organisational design, agile methods, formal coaching or conflict-management models is required. The course does not assume authority to restructure a department, although participants should bring a team context they can influence.

A typical training day

08:30 – 10:30First session
10:30 – 10:45Refreshment break
10:45 – 12:30Second session
12:30 – 13:30Lunch and networking
13:30 – 15:00Third session
15:00 – 15:15Refreshment break
15:15 – 16:30Workshop and daily review

Live online deliveries follow the same structure in East Africa Time, with shorter screen blocks and longer breaks.

What the fee includes

  • Instruction by a practitioner facilitator
  • Full course workbook and materials
  • Exercise files, templates and case studies
  • Refreshments and lunch on classroom deliveries
  • Certificate of completion
  • Post-course application plan

Frequently asked questions

Participants need practical experience of team-based work, supervision or operational coordination. No prior training in agile, coaching, organisational design or formal conflict management is required.

Bring details of a current or planned team, including its purpose, recurring decisions, workflow issues and key stakeholders. Existing team measures, role descriptions or meeting agendas are useful but not essential.

It is best suited to managers, team leaders, project leaders, service delivery managers and experienced team members working in interdependent teams. It is particularly relevant where routine decisions are delayed by approvals or unclear ownership.

General leadership courses usually focus on individual leadership behaviours, while agile courses often focus on product or project delivery methods. This course concentrates on the operating design, authority structures, routines and management practices required for teams to manage work responsibly.

Participants leave with a structured implementation pack based on their own team context. They can use the charter, decision-rights map, operating agreements and 90-day plan to start discussions with their manager and team.

The course runs from 08:30 to 16:30 each day, with approximately 6.5 contact hours daily. Time is divided across instructor input, case analysis, group work, simulations, feedback and application planning.

Questions about this course?

Ask about dates, fees, group bookings or running it for your team. Our training team replies by email.