Crop Monitoring with GIS and Remote Sensing Training Course

Duration 10 days 20 modules · 65 contact hours
Level Intermediate Certificate on completion
Who attends GIS Analysts, Agricultural Officers and others
Fee from USD 2,200 KSh 190,000 for Kenyan organisations
Where 52 cities + online See dates by city
Next start 16 Nov 2026 Course code SD-AA-088

Before you join: Participants should have basic GIS experience, including opening vector and raster layers, managing attribute tables, using map projections and creating simple maps.

Dates & prices

Two start dates a month in every city, and live online on weekdays or weekends. Fees are per participant; classroom fees include tuition, materials, lunch and refreshments, and the certificate.

Suggest a date or city

Showing the next six months. Later dates, other cities and private deliveries for your team are available on request.

Course overview

Crop monitoring teams must turn satellite observations, field records and weather data into timely decisions on crop condition, water stress, pest risk, production estimates and programme targeting. This is difficult when imagery has cloud cover, field boundaries are incomplete, crop calendars vary, and decision-makers need results they can verify. Poorly designed maps or indices can misdirect extension services, insurance assessments, irrigation allocations and food-security response.

This course develops the GIS and remote-sensing workflow required to monitor crops from field to district and national scale. Participants prepare farm and administrative boundary data, acquire optical and radar imagery, calculate vegetation and moisture indices, analyse crop phenology, classify land cover, assess anomalies and produce area and condition estimates. The course covers Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data, Landsat imagery, Google Earth Engine, QGIS, field validation, accuracy assessment and reporting methods suited to agricultural programmes.

Teaching combines short technical briefings with guided software work, agricultural case material, group analysis and application planning. Participants work with realistic datasets drawn from irrigated schemes, smallholder production areas and seasonal monitoring programmes. They leave with a completed crop-monitoring analysis package containing mapped crop areas, condition indicators, anomaly findings, validation evidence and a reporting product that can be adapted to their own geography and crop system.

The course suits professionals responsible for agricultural statistics, food-security monitoring, extension planning, irrigation management, climate adaptation, crop insurance, donor-funded agriculture programmes and geospatial analysis. It is particularly relevant where field observations are costly, seasonal information is delayed, or monitoring must cover large and difficult-to-access areas.

What you will be able to do

  • Prepare crop-monitoring datasets using geodatabases, coordinate reference systems and field-boundary layers
  • Acquire and preprocess Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat imagery for agricultural analysis
  • Calculate NDVI, EVI, NDWI and radar backscatter indicators for crop condition assessment
  • Interpret crop phenology from multi-temporal satellite imagery and crop calendars
  • Classify crop and non-crop land cover using supervised classification workflows
  • Validate satellite-derived results using field observations, confusion matrices and accuracy metrics
  • Produce crop-condition anomaly maps using seasonal baselines and standardized indicators
  • Present a complete GIS crop-monitoring product with maps, findings and decision recommendations

Benefits of attending

For you

  • Produce defensible crop-condition maps from satellite imagery and field observations
  • Interpret vegetation-index trends against crop calendars and seasonal rainfall patterns
  • Build a reusable workflow for district, scheme or national crop monitoring
  • Communicate satellite-derived findings clearly to agricultural and programme decision-makers
  • Strengthen technical capability for agriculture, climate and food-security roles

For your organisation

  • Earlier identification of crop stress, delayed planting and poor seasonal performance
  • More consistent crop-area and condition evidence for programme planning
  • Reduced dependence on costly field visits for large-area monitoring
  • Better targeting of extension, irrigation, inputs and humanitarian assessments
  • Auditable methods for agricultural reporting, donor review and operational decisions

Course modules

20 modules over 10 days

Participants can frame crop-monitoring questions around measurable agricultural decisions and evidence needs.

  • Crop monitoring questions for area, condition, phenology and production estimates
  • Decision chains linking satellite evidence to extension and response actions
  • Spatial scales from plot observations to national agricultural reporting
  • Crop calendars, planting windows and critical growth-stage monitoring points
  • Sources of uncertainty in satellite-derived agricultural information products
  • Monitoring indicators matched to rainfed, irrigated and mixed farming systems

Participants can organise spatial datasets for repeatable agricultural monitoring workflows.

  • Geodatabase structure for fields, farms, schemes, districts and observations
  • Coordinate reference systems selected for local measurement and regional analysis
  • Field boundary digitising rules using imagery, GPS tracks and cadastral records
  • Attribute schema for crop type, planting date, variety and management
  • Topology checks identifying overlaps, gaps, duplicates and invalid geometries
  • Metadata records documenting source, date, resolution, processing and limitations

Participants can select suitable satellite data sources for defined crop-monitoring tasks.

  • Optical sensors measuring reflected energy across visible and infrared bands
  • Synthetic aperture radar measuring backscatter through cloud and darkness
  • Sentinel-2 bands, revisit intervals and agricultural spatial resolution
  • Sentinel-1 polarization, acquisition modes and crop-structure sensitivity
  • Landsat archive value for long-term agricultural trend analysis
  • Sensor selection based on crop type, season, scale and cloud cover

Participants can prepare satellite imagery for consistent crop-condition analysis.

  • Image search parameters using date, cloud cover, footprint and processing level
  • Surface reflectance products selected instead of uncorrected top-of-atmosphere imagery
  • Cloud and cloud-shadow masking using scene classification and quality bands
  • Mosaicking adjacent scenes while preserving comparable acquisition dates
  • Clipping raster collections to fields, districts and agricultural command areas
  • Raster alignment checks for pixel size, extent, projection and grid origin

Participants can use QGIS raster tools to inspect, calculate and map agricultural indicators.

  • Raster symbology using stretch methods, colour ramps and meaningful thresholds
  • Band combinations highlighting vegetation, bare soil, water and crop stress
  • Raster Calculator expressions for pixel-based agricultural indicator generation
  • Zonal statistics summarising imagery by field, farm and administrative unit
  • Sampling pixel values for inspection against known field conditions
  • Map layouts combining indicators, boundaries, legends, scale bars and sources

Participants can calculate and interpret vegetation indices for crop-condition monitoring.

  • NDVI calculated from near-infrared and red reflectance values
  • EVI selected where dense vegetation causes NDVI saturation
  • SAVI applied where exposed soil strongly affects vegetation signals
  • NDWI and NDMI interpreted for canopy and surface moisture conditions
  • Index thresholds calibrated against crop stage, local soils and field evidence
  • False colour composites used to inspect index patterns before reporting

Participants can interpret Sentinel-1 radar backscatter for crop monitoring under cloud cover.

  • VV and VH polarization responses from crop canopy structure
  • Radar preprocessing steps including orbit files, calibration and terrain correction
  • Speckle filtering choices and their effects on field-scale interpretation
  • Backscatter time series identifying planting, canopy development and harvest
  • Flooded rice detection using low backscatter and temporal change
  • Optical-radar combinations improving observations during cloudy growing seasons

Participants can derive crop-development patterns from multi-temporal satellite observations.

  • Time-series stacks organised by acquisition date, sensor and processing status
  • Median compositing reduces cloud contamination within defined monitoring periods
  • Seasonal NDVI profiles compared with expected crop-calendar development
  • Start-of-season detection using sustained vegetation increase thresholds
  • Peak greenness and senescence dates derived from smoothed profiles
  • Phenology metrics separated for single, double and perennial cropping systems

Participants can build basic cloud-based scripts for agricultural image collection and analysis.

  • Earth Engine data catalogue searched for Sentinel, Landsat and climate collections
  • ImageCollection filters applied by boundary, date, metadata and cloud percentage
  • JavaScript functions mapping index calculations across image collections
  • Reducers generate median composites, zonal summaries and seasonal statistics
  • Chart tools display field-level and district-level vegetation time series
  • Export settings create GeoTIFF rasters, tables and map-ready outputs

Participants can design field observations that support calibration and validation of satellite analysis.

  • Ground-truth protocols recording crop type, growth stage and management practices
  • Stratified sampling distributes observations across classes, zones and conditions
  • Mobile forms capture coordinates, photographs, observations and enumerator identifiers
  • Field visit timing aligned with image dates and crop phenology
  • Photo interpretation rules distinguish crops, weeds, fallow land and residues
  • Data quality checks identify missing coordinates, improbable dates and duplicate records

Participants can create supervised classifications for crop and non-crop mapping.

  • Classification scheme defines crop classes, mixed classes and minimum mapping units
  • Training samples selected from verified field observations and image interpretation
  • Random Forest classification using spectral bands, indices and temporal features
  • Feature selection reduces redundant variables and unstable classification inputs
  • Post-classification filtering removes isolated pixels and implausible field fragments
  • Class area summaries produced by district, irrigation block and reporting zone

Participants can evaluate mapped crop classes and communicate uncertainty appropriately.

  • Independent validation samples separated from classifier training observations
  • Confusion matrices comparing mapped classes against reference observations
  • Producer accuracy measures omission errors for each crop class
  • User accuracy measures commission errors affecting map interpretation
  • Overall accuracy and F1 scores reported with class-level results
  • Quality assurance log records assumptions, tests, corrections and approval decisions

Participants can identify areas performing below or above expected seasonal crop conditions.

  • Historical baselines constructed from comparable dekads, months and crop seasons
  • Vegetation Condition Index standardises current greenness against historical extremes
  • Z-score anomalies identify unusually low or high seasonal index values
  • Rainfall anomalies compared with vegetation response and planting-date evidence
  • Anomaly thresholds prioritise field verification and extension follow-up areas
  • Maps distinguish delayed development, moisture stress and normal seasonal variation

Participants can assess water-related crop risks using spatial and temporal indicators.

  • Irrigated and rainfed fields distinguished through seasonal vegetation persistence
  • Surface-water mapping uses NDWI thresholds and contextual image interpretation
  • Evapotranspiration products interpreted alongside crop stage and irrigation schedules
  • Water productivity indicators compare biomass proxies with applied water estimates
  • Drought monitoring combines rainfall deficits, vegetation anomalies and soil moisture
  • Irrigation scheme maps identify inactive blocks and uneven crop development

Participants can develop transparent area and production estimates from mapped evidence.

  • Crop area calculated from classified pixels, field boundaries and sampling frames
  • Area-adjusted estimation corrects mapped totals using reference sample information
  • Yield proxy indicators relate seasonal greenness to historical harvest records
  • Production estimates combine crop area, yield assumptions and uncertainty ranges
  • Administrative aggregation preserves traceability from field to national totals
  • Estimate documentation records sources, formulas, assumptions and confidence limits

Participants can use remote-sensing evidence to target investigation of crop damage.

  • Damage signatures assessed through abrupt vegetation decline and spatial clustering
  • Before-and-after image comparison identifies flood, hail and wind damage
  • Field reports integrated with satellite anomalies for pest surveillance targeting
  • Change detection separates crop loss from normal harvest and senescence
  • Damage severity classes defined with field evidence and image thresholds
  • Remote-sensing limits communicated for disease diagnosis and causal attribution

Participants can combine crop-monitoring results with operational planning data.

  • Overlay analysis links crop stress with extension coverage and input distribution
  • Hot spot analysis identifies clusters of persistent low-condition fields
  • Accessibility surfaces estimate travel time for field verification teams
  • Prioritisation matrix ranks locations by severity, exposure and response feasibility
  • Administrative dashboards summarise area, condition and anomaly indicators
  • Decision thresholds connect mapped evidence to predefined management actions

Participants can produce clear crop-monitoring outputs for technical and non-technical users.

  • Map purpose determines scale, classification, labels and supporting charts
  • Colour schemes distinguish crop condition classes without misleading visual emphasis
  • Annotation explains index dates, baselines, thresholds and known limitations
  • Briefing notes state findings, confidence, implications and recommended actions
  • Technical annexes document imagery, processing chain and validation results
  • Version control manages revisions to maps, scripts, data and reports

Participants can design an operational workflow for recurring seasonal crop monitoring.

  • Monitoring calendar schedules imagery, field checks, analysis and reporting cycles
  • Standard operating procedures assign data acquisition, processing and review responsibilities
  • Data governance defines access, retention, naming conventions and quality controls
  • Trigger criteria initiate alerts, verification requests and management briefings
  • Resource plan identifies staff roles, software, connectivity and field logistics
  • Performance measures track timeliness, accuracy, use and reporting completion

Participants can build, review and present a complete crop-monitoring analysis package for a defined agricultural area.

  • Monitoring question defined with crop system, geography, season and users
  • Input datasets assembled from boundaries, imagery, field observations and climate records
  • Processing workflow applies preprocessing, indices, time series and classification methods
  • Validation evidence assesses results using reference data and accuracy metrics
  • Decision product presents maps, anomaly findings, limitations and recommended actions
  • Peer review tests technical traceability, interpretation and reporting clarity

Exercises and examples are adapted to each cohort's sectors and roles.

What you take back to work

  1. Crop-monitoring workflow template
  2. Satellite imagery preprocessing checklist
  3. Field validation and sampling plan
  4. Crop-condition anomaly map package
  5. Classification accuracy assessment template
  6. Seasonal agricultural monitoring plan

Who should attend

  • GIS Analysts — need repeatable workflows for agricultural mapping and monitoring
  • Agricultural Officers — require timely evidence for extension and production planning
  • Food Security Analysts — monitor seasonal crop conditions and emerging production risks
  • Remote Sensing Specialists — apply satellite methods to crop-specific monitoring questions
  • Irrigation Managers — assess water use, crop stress and scheme performance
  • Monitoring and Evaluation Officers — verify agricultural programme results with spatial evidence

Skills and tools covered

Satellite image processingCrop condition analysisGIS data managementLand-cover classificationField data validationAgricultural reporting

Tools and standards

QGIS, Google Earth Engine, Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2

How the course runs

Training methodology

The course uses short instructor briefings followed by guided analysis in QGIS and Google Earth Engine. Participants interpret satellite scenes, construct indicator time series, compare field and satellite evidence, and prepare decision-ready maps from agricultural case datasets. Group work examines choices such as index selection, cloud handling, classification design and validation sampling. Simulations address seasonal monitoring decisions under incomplete information. Each participant develops an application plan linking available data, crop calendars, reporting needs and operational users.

Requirements and prerequisites

Participants should have basic GIS experience, including opening vector and raster layers, managing attribute tables, using map projections and creating simple maps. Familiarity with agricultural production systems, crop calendars or field data collection is useful. Participants should be comfortable working with spreadsheets and interpreting charts. Prior experience with QGIS, ArcGIS, programming, image classification or Google Earth Engine is not required. The course introduces the required remote-sensing concepts and provides structured workflows before participants apply them to crop-monitoring tasks.

A typical training day

08:30 – 10:30First session
10:30 – 10:45Refreshment break
10:45 – 12:30Second session
12:30 – 13:30Lunch and networking
13:30 – 15:00Third session
15:00 – 15:15Refreshment break
15:15 – 16:30Workshop and daily review

Live online deliveries follow the same structure in East Africa Time, with shorter screen blocks and longer breaks.

What the fee includes

  • Instruction by a practitioner facilitator
  • Full course workbook and materials
  • Exercise files, templates and case studies
  • Refreshments and lunch on classroom deliveries
  • Certificate of completion
  • Post-course application plan

Frequently asked questions

Participants need basic GIS familiarity, including working with map layers, attribute tables and coordinate systems. Remote-sensing analysis, coding and Google Earth Engine experience are not required.

Participants should bring a laptop capable of running QGIS and a current web browser for Google Earth Engine. Bringing a crop boundary file, field observations or a current monitoring question is useful but not mandatory.

The course is designed for GIS analysts, agricultural officers, food-security analysts, irrigation teams and monitoring staff. It suits professionals who need to convert spatial data into recurring crop-condition evidence.

General GIS courses focus on broad mapping and spatial analysis methods, while this course centres on agricultural decisions. The datasets, indices, time-series methods, validation approaches and reporting outputs are specifically selected for crop monitoring.

Participants can adapt the workflow to monitor planting progress, vegetation condition, water stress, crop area or localised damage. The operational monitoring plan and reusable templates support implementation during the next growing season.

The first week establishes GIS, imagery, index and time-series workflows, with participants producing usable analytical outputs early. The second week develops classification, validation, anomalies, operational design and a final capstone analysis; each day runs from 08:30 to 16:30 with about 6.5 contact hours.

Questions about this course?

Ask about dates, fees, group bookings or running it for your team. Our training team replies by email.