Culturally Responsive Teaching Training Course

Duration 10 days 21 modules · 65 contact hours
Level Intermediate Certificate on completion
Who attends Teachers, Instructional Coaches and others
Fee from USD 2,200 KSh 190,000 for Kenyan organisations
Where 52 cities + online See dates by city
Next start 16 Nov 2026 Course code SD-EM-089

Before you join: Participants should have experience teaching, facilitating learning, coaching educators, designing curriculum or managing an education programme.

Dates & prices

Two start dates a month in every city, and live online on weekdays or weekends. Fees are per participant; classroom fees include tuition, materials, lunch and refreshments, and the certificate.

Suggest a date or city

Showing the next six months. Later dates, other cities and private deliveries for your team are available on request.

Course overview

Learner attainment, participation and trust can suffer when teaching materials, classroom routines and assessment practices treat one cultural perspective as the default. Educators and education managers need practical ways to recognise whose knowledge is represented, identify barriers created by their own systems, and maintain rigorous expectations for every learner. Culturally responsive teaching is not a collection of celebration days or translated resources; it is an evidence-informed approach to relationships, curriculum, instruction, assessment and school routines.

This course equips participants to design learning that connects academic content to learners’ identities, communities, languages and prior knowledge. Participants use culturally responsive teaching principles associated with Geneva Gay, Zaretta Hammond’s Ready for Rigor framework, Funds of Knowledge and Universal Design for Learning. They examine positionality and implicit bias, gather learner and community evidence ethically, audit curriculum representation, structure inclusive dialogue, improve feedback and assessment, and use restorative responses to behaviour and conflict.

Instruction combines concise faculty input with education cases, lesson and policy analysis, facilitated peer critique, planning workshops and teaching simulations. Participants work from a current subject, programme, classroom challenge or institutional priority from the first week. They leave with a culturally responsive teaching implementation portfolio containing a learner-context profile, curriculum audit, redesigned lesson sequence, assessment plan, relationship routines and measures for reviewing impact.

The course suits teachers, lecturers, instructional coaches and education leaders responsible for learning quality, inclusion and learner outcomes. It is relevant to schools, universities, vocational providers, public education systems, international schools and workplace learning teams.

What you will be able to do

  • Apply Geneva Gay’s culturally responsive teaching principles to lesson and programme design
  • Construct a learner-context profile using identity, language, community and prior-learning evidence
  • Audit curriculum materials for representation, perspective, omission and stereotypical framing
  • Design high-expectation learning sequences using Hammond’s Ready for Rigor framework
  • Facilitate identity-safe classroom dialogue through structured discourse protocols
  • Create culturally responsive assessment, feedback and grading practices
  • Develop restorative classroom routines for behaviour, belonging and conflict repair
  • Present a culturally responsive teaching implementation portfolio with evaluation measures

Benefits of attending

For you

  • A defensible method for reviewing teaching choices through culture, identity and power
  • Stronger facilitation of difficult classroom dialogue without lowering academic expectations
  • Practical language for addressing bias, exclusion and representation with colleagues
  • A reusable process for adapting lessons to learner knowledge and community contexts
  • A completed implementation portfolio suitable for appraisal or professional development records

For your organisation

  • More consistent teaching practices that support participation, belonging and learner retention
  • Curriculum materials reviewed for omissions, stereotypes and narrow knowledge representation
  • Improved staff capacity to respond constructively to identity-related classroom issues
  • Clearer links between inclusion commitments and everyday teaching, assessment and behaviour routines
  • A common evidence base for coaching, quality assurance and teaching improvement planning

Course modules

21 modules over 10 days

Participants can distinguish culturally responsive teaching from superficial inclusion initiatives.

  • Geneva Gay’s culturally responsive teaching principles and instructional implications
  • Academic rigour, cultural competence and critical consciousness in lesson design
  • Distinguishing cultural responsiveness from multicultural celebrations and token representation
  • Teacher expectations as signals shaping learner participation and achievement
  • Culture, identity and power within everyday classroom decision making
  • Defining observable culturally responsive practices for local teaching contexts

Participants can use structured reflection to identify how positionality affects teaching decisions.

  • Positionality mapping for educator identities, privileges and professional assumptions
  • Implicit Association Test limitations and responsible use in reflective practice
  • Confirmation bias patterns in interpreting learner behaviour and performance
  • Critical incident analysis for examining assumptions behind classroom responses
  • Cultural humility as an ongoing stance rather than achieved competence
  • Reflection protocols that separate intent, impact and repair actions

Participants can build an ethical learner-context profile that informs teaching choices.

  • Funds of Knowledge interviews identifying household, community and workplace expertise
  • Learner-context profiles combining language, identity, interests and prior learning
  • Asset mapping of community resources, relationships and cultural practices
  • Ethical data collection, consent, confidentiality and voluntary learner disclosure
  • Avoiding cultural essentialism when interpreting group-level learner information
  • Triangulating learner voice, observation records and attainment evidence

Participants can establish classroom routines that communicate belonging, respect and high expectations.

  • Identity-safe classroom cues within greetings, names, displays and routines
  • Warm demander practice combining relational warmth with explicit academic challenge
  • Pronunciation, naming and pronoun practices that affirm learner identity
  • Two-by-ten relationship strategy adapted for sustained learner connection
  • Teacher credibility built through consistency, transparency and cultural curiosity
  • Belonging check-ins that identify participation barriers without public disclosure

Participants can audit curriculum content for representation, perspective and omission.

  • Curriculum representation audit using authorship, perspective, context and omission criteria
  • Window, mirror and sliding-glass-door text selection principles
  • Counter-narratives that challenge single stories without distorting disciplinary evidence
  • Source provenance checks for whose knowledge curriculum materials privilege
  • Sequencing multiple perspectives while maintaining disciplinary concepts and standards
  • Replacing stereotypical examples with specific, evidence-based contextual materials

Participants can plan rigorous learning with culturally responsive scaffolding.

  • Hammond’s Ready for Rigor framework and the learning partnership
  • Dependent and independent learner behaviours within cognitive apprenticeship
  • Productive struggle routines before teacher rescue or answer provision
  • Scaffolding academic language without reducing conceptual complexity
  • Worked examples and gradual release for unfamiliar disciplinary practices
  • Metacognitive prompts that make expert thinking visible to learners

Participants can use UDL to widen access while preserving intended learning outcomes.

  • Universal Design for Learning engagement, representation and action principles
  • Barrier analysis separating learning goals from customary delivery methods
  • Multiple means of representation for abstract concepts and disciplinary vocabulary
  • Choice architecture that preserves challenge while varying routes to participation
  • Accessible learning materials using plain language, captions and readable layouts
  • Checking accommodations against learner dignity, independence and assessment validity

Participants can redesign a lesson sequence using learner evidence and responsive teaching moves.

  • Lesson alignment among outcomes, prior knowledge, tasks and evidence
  • Culturally relevant entry points connected to learners’ lived experiences
  • Anticipating misconceptions through learner-context evidence and formative probes
  • Explicit success criteria written in accessible, learner-facing language
  • Question sequencing from activation through analysis, synthesis and transfer
  • Responsive lesson plan template integrating identity, access and cognitive demand

Participants can facilitate structured dialogue that includes diverse voices and language repertoires.

  • Talk moves that press for reasoning, evidence, clarification and connection
  • Think-pair-share adaptations for multilingual and reluctant contributors
  • Wait time and participation tracking to identify unequal speaking patterns
  • Translanguaging strategies supporting meaning-making before formal academic expression
  • Discussion agreements for disagreement, identity claims and contested issues
  • Structured Academic Controversy for evidence-based exploration of opposing positions

Participants can structure group learning to reduce exclusion and unequal task allocation.

  • Johnson and Johnson’s positive interdependence and individual accountability principles
  • Role design preventing status hierarchies from dominating collaborative tasks
  • Complex instruction strategies for assigning competence publicly and specifically
  • Groupworthy tasks requiring multiple perspectives, methods and contribution types
  • Observation rubrics tracking voice, influence and equitable participation
  • Debrief questions connecting collaboration patterns to classroom power dynamics

Participants can design valid assessments that reduce construct-irrelevant cultural barriers.

  • Construct-irrelevant variance in assessment language, context and response formats
  • Assessment blueprint linking outcomes, evidence, criteria and task conditions
  • Context review for cultural assumptions unrelated to assessed competence
  • Multiple evidence sources within valid and comparable assessment designs
  • Analytic rubrics separating disciplinary quality from language conventions
  • Learner self-assessment against transparent success criteria and exemplars

Participants can provide feedback and grading practices that sustain learner agency and trust.

  • Task, process and self-regulation feedback using Hattie and Timperley’s model
  • Actionable feedback language focused on evidence, strategy and next steps
  • Standards-based grading distinctions between mastery, behaviour and compliance
  • Calibration protocols improving consistency across assessors and learner groups
  • Grade review procedures that communicate fairness, evidence and respect
  • Feedback conferences supporting learner agency, revision and academic identity

Participants can plan instruction that values multilingualism while developing academic language.

  • Language objectives paired with disciplinary outcomes and success criteria
  • Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol features for comprehensible academic input
  • Sentence frames as temporary supports rather than fixed language limits
  • Home-language resources supporting concept development and family communication
  • Distinguishing language acquisition needs from misconceptions about subject content
  • Academic vocabulary routines using morphology, context and repeated retrieval

Participants can identify intersecting barriers affecting learners with disabilities and diverse identities.

  • Intersectionality analysis of disability, race, language, gender and socioeconomic status
  • Strengths-based learner profiles replacing deficit labels and low-expectation assumptions
  • Reasonable adjustments aligned with stated learning outcomes and assessment requirements
  • Sensory, executive-function and communication barriers within classroom routines
  • Person-first and identity-first language choices guided by learner preference
  • Collaboration boundaries among teachers, specialists, families and support services

Participants can respond to classroom distress and conflict through predictable, restorative routines.

  • Trauma-informed principles of safety, trustworthiness, choice, collaboration and voice
  • Co-regulation routines supporting learners during stress and emotional escalation
  • Restorative questions for harm, impact, needs and repair commitments
  • Affective statements that describe impact without shaming learner identity
  • Predictable transitions and routines reducing uncertainty and behavioural escalation
  • Referral boundaries when safeguarding, wellbeing or specialist intervention is required

Participants can review discipline patterns and replace exclusionary responses with equitable alternatives.

  • Discipline data disaggregation by identity, incident type, location and outcome
  • Subjective offence definitions and their exposure to implicit bias
  • Behaviour-specific praise replacing vague approval and compliance narratives
  • Pre-correction techniques before predictable routines, transitions and group work
  • Restorative re-entry plans following removal, suspension or conflict incidents
  • Decision trees distinguishing safety risks from relationship and learning concerns

Participants can create reciprocal partnership approaches with families and community contributors.

  • Family engagement mapping across communication, decision making and learning support
  • Reciprocal communication methods that seek family knowledge before recommendations
  • Community co-design boundaries covering safeguarding, compensation and intellectual property
  • Accessible meeting formats respecting language, time, transport and caregiving constraints
  • Strengths-based family conversations about attendance, attainment and behaviour
  • Partnership plans linking local expertise to authentic curriculum experiences

Participants can evaluate culturally responsive teaching changes using disaggregated evidence.

  • Equity audit questions for access, participation, experience and attainment
  • Disaggregated data interpretation without treating groups as culturally uniform
  • Student voice surveys designed with anonymity, accessibility and actionable questions
  • Classroom observation evidence aligned to defined responsive teaching practices
  • Plan-do-study-act cycles for testing instructional changes and reviewing results
  • Balancing quantitative indicators with learner narratives and work samples

Participants can lead a practical implementation cycle for culturally responsive teaching improvement.

  • Instructional coaching cycles using goal setting, observation and evidence review
  • Non-evaluative feedback conversations using descriptive classroom evidence
  • Implementation drivers covering competency, organisation and leadership supports
  • Professional learning communities focused on learner work and teaching evidence
  • Change-readiness analysis identifying resistance, risks, allies and resource needs
  • Ninety-day implementation plans with milestones, owners and review measures

Participants can assemble and strengthen a coherent culturally responsive teaching portfolio.

  • Portfolio architecture connecting learner evidence, design decisions and evaluation measures
  • Lesson sequence review against representation, access, rigour and belonging criteria
  • Tuning protocol for focused peer critique and revision planning
  • Evidence annotations explaining why each teaching choice was selected
  • Implementation risk register covering capacity, stakeholder concerns and mitigation actions
  • Presentation structures for communicating educational change to decision makers

Participants can build, review and present a complete culturally responsive teaching implementation portfolio for a defined learner group.

  • Learner-context profile supported by ethical evidence and asset mapping
  • Curriculum representation audit identifying revisions, additions and knowledge gaps
  • Redesigned lesson sequence integrating rigour, access, dialogue and formative assessment
  • Assessment and feedback plan addressing validity, transparency and learner agency
  • Relationship, restorative and family partnership routines aligned to implementation goals
  • Evaluation dashboard with participation, learner voice, attainment and review measures

Exercises and examples are adapted to each cohort's sectors and roles.

What you take back to work

  1. Learner-context profile template
  2. Curriculum representation audit checklist
  3. Culturally responsive lesson sequence template
  4. Inclusive assessment and feedback plan
  5. Restorative classroom routines guide
  6. Ninety-day implementation and evaluation plan

Who should attend

  • Teachers — redesign lessons, assessments and routines for more equitable participation
  • Instructional Coaches — support colleagues through evidence-based teaching improvement cycles
  • School Leaders — align teaching expectations, inclusion priorities and professional learning
  • University Lecturers — improve participation and belonging in diverse adult-learning groups
  • Curriculum Leaders — review programme materials for representation and knowledge balance
  • Learning and Development Managers — design inclusive workplace learning for mixed cohorts

Skills and tools covered

Culturally responsive pedagogyCurriculum representation auditingInclusive assessment designIdentity-safe facilitationRestorative classroom practiceImplementation planning

Tools and standards

Geneva Gay’s Culturally Responsive Teaching framework, Hammond’s Ready for Rigor framework, Universal Design for Learning Guidelines, Funds of Knowledge approach

How the course runs

Training methodology

Faculty briefings introduce key research, frameworks and teaching methods before participants apply them to realistic school, university and workplace-learning cases. Small-group analysis examines curriculum extracts, assessment tasks, learner evidence and classroom incidents. Teaching simulations allow participants to test discussion structures, feedback language and restorative responses. Guided design workshops build portfolio components progressively, while peer review uses clear critique protocols. Individual application planning connects each participant’s work to their subject area, learner group, programme or institutional improvement priority.

Requirements and prerequisites

Participants should have experience teaching, facilitating learning, coaching educators, designing curriculum or managing an education programme. They should be able to bring a current lesson, unit plan, assessment, learner-engagement issue or institutional policy for analysis. Familiarity with basic lesson planning and formative assessment is useful. No prior study of culturally responsive teaching, sociology, intercultural communication or educational psychology is required. The course does not require participants to disclose personal identity experiences; reflective work can be completed through professional scenarios and anonymised examples.

A typical training day

08:30 – 10:30First session
10:30 – 10:45Refreshment break
10:45 – 12:30Second session
12:30 – 13:30Lunch and networking
13:30 – 15:00Third session
15:00 – 15:15Refreshment break
15:15 – 16:30Workshop and daily review

Live online deliveries follow the same structure in East Africa Time, with shorter screen blocks and longer breaks.

What the fee includes

  • Instruction by a practitioner facilitator
  • Full course workbook and materials
  • Exercise files, templates and case studies
  • Refreshments and lunch on classroom deliveries
  • Certificate of completion
  • Post-course application plan

Frequently asked questions

Participants need experience teaching, designing learning, coaching educators or managing an education programme. No prior qualification in culturally responsive teaching or intercultural studies is required.

Bring a current lesson plan, unit, assessment, learner-engagement challenge or policy document that can be reviewed during the course. Materials may be anonymised where they contain learner or institutional information.

It is designed for teachers, lecturers, instructional coaches, curriculum leaders and school or programme leaders. It also suits learning and development professionals responsible for diverse workplace learning groups.

DEI awareness training commonly addresses organisational culture, policy and interpersonal conduct. This course concentrates on the teaching craft: curriculum, instruction, discourse, assessment, feedback, behaviour and learner evidence.

Participants develop portfolio materials around a live teaching or programme challenge from the first week. The final implementation plan assigns actions, owners, evidence sources and review points for the following ninety days.

The first week establishes learner evidence, relationships, curriculum review, lesson design and inclusive participation methods. The second week deepens assessment, multilingual inclusion, restorative practice, data inquiry, implementation leadership and portfolio presentation across approximately 65 contact hours.

Questions about this course?

Ask about dates, fees, group bookings or running it for your team. Our training team replies by email.