Education Policy and Reform Training Course

Duration 10 days 19 modules · 65 contact hours
Level Intermediate Certificate on completion
Who attends Ministry of Education Officials, Education Programme Managers and others
Fee from USD 2,200 KSh 190,000 for Kenyan organisations
Where 52 cities + online See dates by city
Next start 16 Nov 2026 Course code SD-EM-121

Before you join: Participants should have experience in education administration, programme delivery, public policy, development cooperation, school leadership or a related field.

Dates & prices

Two start dates a month in every city, and live online on weekdays or weekends. Fees are per participant; classroom fees include tuition, materials, lunch and refreshments, and the certificate.

Suggest a date or city

Showing the next six months. Later dates, other cities and private deliveries for your team are available on request.

Course overview

Education reform is difficult because policy choices affect public budgets, political commitments, teacher work, family expectations and learner outcomes at the same time. Ministries, local authorities, development partners and education providers must make decisions with incomplete data, competing priorities and limited implementation capacity. A well-written policy can still fail when financing, governance, communication, accountability and frontline delivery are not aligned.

This course examines education policy through international and national system perspectives. Participants assess education sector challenges, define policy problems, compare reform options and prepare evidence-based policy responses. The syllabus covers governance, equity, inclusion, learning outcomes, teacher policy, curriculum, assessment, education finance, digital education, stakeholder engagement and reform implementation. Participants use tools including problem trees, stakeholder maps, Theory of Change models, results frameworks, costed implementation plans and monitoring indicators.

Teaching combines short instructor briefings with comparative cases from public school systems, higher education, technical and vocational education, humanitarian education and donor-funded reform programmes. Group work, policy simulations and structured peer review allow participants to test choices against political, fiscal and operational constraints. Throughout the course, each participant develops a policy reform dossier for a real or realistic education challenge, including a problem analysis, options appraisal, implementation roadmap, monitoring framework and communication plan. The course is delivered over 10 instructor-led days, from 08:30 to 16:30, in classrooms in more than 50 cities or live online. Participants receive a certificate of completion.

The course suits professionals responsible for shaping, advising on, funding, managing or implementing education reforms. It is particularly relevant where education systems are seeking stronger learning outcomes, fairer access, better teacher support, more accountable spending or credible responses to demographic, technological and social change.

What you will be able to do

  • Analyse education system performance using equity, quality, efficiency and resilience indicators
  • Define policy problems through problem trees, root-cause analysis and stakeholder evidence
  • Compare education reform options using feasibility, cost, equity and political criteria
  • Design a Theory of Change for an education policy or reform programme
  • Prepare a costed implementation roadmap with roles, milestones, risks and dependencies
  • Develop education financing proposals using unit costs, budget scenarios and fiscal constraints
  • Construct a results framework with indicators, baselines, targets and data sources
  • Present a complete education policy reform dossier to decision-makers and stakeholders

Benefits of attending

For you

  • Produce policy advice that links learner needs, evidence, financing and implementation
  • Lead structured discussions on contested education reform choices
  • Assess international reform examples without copying unsuitable models
  • Build credible cases for funding, sequencing and monitoring education initiatives
  • Present policy recommendations clearly to senior officials and partner organisations

For your organisation

  • Improves the quality and implementability of education policy proposals
  • Reduces reform delays caused by unclear responsibilities and unmanaged dependencies
  • Strengthens links between sector plans, budgets, delivery systems and measurable results
  • Supports more equitable allocation of resources across learner groups and locations
  • Creates staff capacity to monitor reforms and address implementation risks early

Course modules

19 modules over 10 days

Participants can map an education system and identify the policy forces shaping its priorities.

  • Education as a public good, human right, and economic investment
  • System maps linking learners, schools, ministries, providers, and financing flows
  • Subsidiarity decisions between central, regional, district, and school authorities
  • Policy instruments: regulation, finance, information, service delivery, and persuasion
  • Global commitments shaping national education priorities and reporting obligations
  • Comparative system typologies: centralised, federal, decentralised, and mixed arrangements

Participants can diagnose performance gaps using education data, service evidence and system relationships.

  • Access, completion, learning, equity, efficiency, and resilience performance dimensions
  • Education Management Information System data quality and common interpretation errors
  • Disaggregating indicators by gender, disability, location, wealth, language, and displacement
  • Learning assessment evidence from classroom, national, regional, and international sources
  • Problem trees separating symptoms, immediate causes, structural causes, and assumptions
  • Bottleneck analysis for enrolment, attendance, progression, teacher deployment, and learning

Participants can frame an education policy problem and develop a defensible policy agenda.

  • Policy cycle stages from agenda setting through evaluation and revision
  • Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework for opening education reform windows
  • Defining policy problems with evidence, affected groups, scale, and urgency
  • Issue framing choices affecting public support, political ownership, and resource allocation
  • Policy narratives connecting learner outcomes, national priorities, and feasible action
  • Agenda-setting risks from crises, media pressure, elections, and donor incentives

Participants can compare international policy approaches and judge their local suitability.

  • Comparative policy analysis using context, mechanism, outcome, and transferability criteria
  • Policy borrowing, adaptation, translation, and rejection across education systems
  • PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS, and regional assessments as comparative evidence sources
  • Benchmarking reforms without confusing correlation, reputation, and causal impact
  • Context tests covering fiscal capacity, institutional capability, politics, and culture
  • Lessons from curriculum, teacher, financing, and accountability reform experiences

Participants can incorporate equity and inclusion requirements into education policy design.

  • Rights-based education principles: availability, accessibility, acceptability, and adaptability
  • Equity audits identifying exclusion patterns in participation, learning, and progression
  • Universal Design for Learning principles within curriculum and instructional policy
  • Disability inclusion provisions covering data, facilities, materials, and teacher support
  • Gender-responsive education policies addressing safety, participation, and learning barriers
  • Targeted interventions for rural learners, minorities, migrants, refugees, and out-of-school children

Participants can define governance arrangements that support accountable education reform delivery.

  • Governance mapping of mandates, decision rights, incentives, and accountability relationships
  • RACI matrices for ministry departments, local authorities, schools, and partners
  • School-based management models and conditions for effective local discretion
  • Accountability mechanisms: inspection, reporting, audits, performance agreements, and citizen feedback
  • Managing principal-agent problems between ministries, districts, schools, and providers
  • Anti-corruption controls for procurement, payroll, examinations, and school grants

Participants can develop a reform Theory of Change linked to sector priorities and assumptions.

  • Education sector plan components: diagnosis, priorities, strategies, costs, and monitoring
  • Theory of Change pathways from inputs and activities to learner outcomes
  • Assumption mapping for political commitment, capacity, behaviour, and resource availability
  • Causal chains connecting teacher support, classroom practice, and learning improvement
  • Prioritisation matrices scoring urgency, impact, feasibility, cost, and equity
  • Sequencing reforms through enabling actions, pilots, scale-up, and institutionalisation

Participants can assess financing options and prepare resource allocation proposals for education reforms.

  • Education expenditure patterns by level, programme, geography, and learner group
  • Unit-cost analysis for classrooms, teachers, textbooks, meals, and student support
  • Medium-term expenditure frameworks linking policy commitments to fiscal ceilings
  • Formula funding approaches using enrolment, disadvantage, need, and remoteness factors
  • Scenario budgeting for enrolment growth, salary changes, inflation, and capital investment
  • Public financial management controls from appropriation through expenditure reporting

Participants can formulate workforce policies that address teacher supply, quality and retention.

  • Teacher labour-market analysis covering supply, demand, deployment, and attrition
  • Workforce planning models using enrolment projections, pupil-teacher ratios, and subject needs
  • Teacher career structures, standards, appraisal, professional development, and promotion
  • Incentive design for rural postings, shortage subjects, attendance, and retention
  • School leadership standards linked to instructional leadership and school improvement
  • Collective bargaining considerations within teacher policy and reform communication

Participants can align curriculum, teaching support and assessment policy around intended learning outcomes.

  • Curriculum frameworks defining competencies, content progression, and expected learning outcomes
  • Constructive alignment between curriculum standards, pedagogy, assessment, and teacher development
  • Textbook and learning-materials policies covering quality assurance, procurement, and distribution
  • Formative, summative, national, and international assessment purposes and limitations
  • Assessment validity, reliability, fairness, comparability, and consequences for learners
  • Using learning data to target instructional support and curriculum revision

Participants can assess technical and vocational education policies against labour-market and equity objectives.

  • Skills anticipation methods using employer surveys, vacancy data, and sector studies
  • Qualification frameworks linking learning outcomes, credentials, progression, and recognition
  • Apprenticeship models balancing employer responsibility, training quality, and learner protection
  • Employer engagement structures for standards, placements, equipment, and curriculum relevance
  • Funding mechanisms for technical training, apprenticeships, stipends, and provider performance
  • Transition indicators covering completion, employment, earnings, and further study

Participants can evaluate higher education policy choices concerning access, quality, autonomy and funding.

  • Higher education system differentiation by mission, programme level, and research function
  • Quality assurance systems using accreditation, external review, and institutional self-evaluation
  • University autonomy, accountability, academic freedom, and public stewardship relationships
  • Student finance options: grants, loans, income-contingent repayment, and fee regulation
  • Admissions policies balancing merit, access, preparedness, and institutional capacity
  • Graduate outcomes data informing programme relevance and funding decisions

Participants can formulate digital education policies that address learning value, access and data protection.

  • Digital education strategies linking infrastructure, content, pedagogy, support, and maintenance
  • Total cost of ownership for devices, connectivity, platforms, training, and replacement
  • Digital divide analysis by household income, geography, disability, gender, and language
  • Data governance principles: purpose limitation, access control, retention, and accountability
  • Artificial intelligence policy questions involving bias, transparency, assessment, and academic integrity
  • Evidence standards for evaluating education technology adoption and learning effects

Participants can plan stakeholder engagement that addresses interests, influence and reform resistance.

  • Stakeholder mapping by interest, influence, legitimacy, position, and mobilisation capacity
  • Political economy analysis of winners, losers, incentives, veto points, and alliances
  • Consultation methods for teachers, learners, families, employers, civil society, and providers
  • Negotiation strategies for contested reforms involving funding, standards, and accountability
  • Communication plans matching messages, messengers, channels, timing, and feedback routes
  • Managing resistance through participation, transitional support, evidence, and credible commitments

Participants can translate policy decisions into phased, accountable and risk-managed implementation plans.

  • Implementation roadmaps specifying workstreams, milestones, owners, dependencies, and decision gates
  • Critical path analysis for legislation, procurement, recruitment, training, and rollout
  • Change management using ADKAR: awareness, desire, knowledge, ability, and reinforcement
  • Implementation readiness assessments covering capacity, systems, funding, and political support
  • Risk registers scoring probability, impact, mitigation actions, owners, and triggers
  • Pilot design criteria for testing feasibility before system-wide expansion

Participants can create monitoring and evaluation arrangements for education policy implementation.

  • Results frameworks linking inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and impact
  • Indicator definitions specifying numerator, denominator, disaggregation, frequency, and responsibility
  • Baseline studies, target setting, data collection plans, and data quality checks
  • OECD DAC evaluation criteria applied to education policy and programmes
  • Contribution analysis for reforms with multiple actors and interacting interventions
  • Adaptive management cycles using monitoring evidence, review meetings, and documented decisions

Participants can incorporate continuity, protection and recovery measures into education reform planning.

  • Education continuity planning for conflict, disasters, epidemics, displacement, and climate shocks
  • Risk-informed education sector analysis linking hazards, exposure, vulnerability, and capacity
  • Safe school standards covering facilities, safeguarding, preparedness, and emergency procedures
  • Alternative learning modalities for interrupted schooling and displaced learner populations
  • Psychosocial support policy considerations for learners, teachers, and affected communities
  • Recovery planning from temporary provision through system reconstruction and reform

Participants can prepare concise decision materials that support informed education reform choices.

  • Policy brief structures: issue, evidence, options, recommendation, costs, and implementation
  • Options appraisal matrices comparing effectiveness, equity, feasibility, cost, and risk
  • Decision memos distinguishing technical evidence, political judgement, and unresolved uncertainty
  • Data visualisation choices for education indicators, trends, gaps, and geographic patterns
  • Cabinet, ministerial, board, and donor briefing requirements and approval pathways
  • Responding to scrutiny from media, legislators, unions, communities, and partners

Participants can build, review and present a complete education policy reform dossier for a defined system challenge.

  • Problem statement supported by education data, stakeholder evidence, and causal analysis
  • Policy options appraisal using agreed criteria, assumptions, costs, and risks
  • Theory of Change connecting selected interventions to measurable learner outcomes
  • Costed implementation roadmap with governance, milestones, dependencies, and accountable owners
  • Results framework specifying indicators, baselines, targets, reporting, and review arrangements
  • Stakeholder communication plan and formal presentation of final reform recommendations

Exercises and examples are adapted to each cohort's sectors and roles.

What you take back to work

  1. Education system diagnostic template
  2. Education policy problem tree
  3. Reform Theory of Change model
  4. Costed implementation roadmap
  5. Education results framework
  6. Education policy reform dossier

Who should attend

  • Ministry of Education Officials — responsible for policy development, planning or reform delivery
  • Education Programme Managers — managing government, donor or NGO education initiatives
  • Local Education Authority Leaders — translating national policy into district and school action
  • Development Partner Staff — assessing, financing or monitoring education sector programmes
  • School Network and University Leaders — responding to system reforms and institutional accountability
  • Policy and Research Advisers — converting education evidence into actionable recommendations

Skills and tools covered

Education policy analysisReform programme designEducation finance planningStakeholder engagementResults-based managementImplementation risk management

Tools and standards

Theory of Change, Results Framework, OECD DAC evaluation criteria, UNESCO SDG 4 Education 2030 Framework for Action

How the course runs

Training methodology

The course uses short briefings to introduce policy concepts, followed by comparative case work from school systems, higher education, vocational training and humanitarian settings. Participants analyse policy documents, budget choices, performance data and stakeholder positions in small groups. Simulations test reform decisions under fiscal, political and operational constraints. Facilitated application planning connects each module to a participant’s own policy issue or organisational mandate. Peer review sessions strengthen the final reform dossier and prepare participants to explain their recommendations to decision-makers.

Requirements and prerequisites

Participants should have experience in education administration, programme delivery, public policy, development cooperation, school leadership or a related field. They should be able to read policy documents, interpret basic tables and discuss organisational challenges using evidence. Familiarity with national education structures, budgeting processes or monitoring systems is helpful but not essential. No prior training in economics, statistics, formal policy analysis or international education frameworks is required. Participants may bring a current policy issue, reform proposal or service-delivery challenge from their own institution.

A typical training day

08:30 – 10:30First session
10:30 – 10:45Refreshment break
10:45 – 12:30Second session
12:30 – 13:30Lunch and networking
13:30 – 15:00Third session
15:00 – 15:15Refreshment break
15:15 – 16:30Workshop and daily review

Live online deliveries follow the same structure in East Africa Time, with shorter screen blocks and longer breaks.

What the fee includes

  • Instruction by a practitioner facilitator
  • Full course workbook and materials
  • Exercise files, templates and case studies
  • Refreshments and lunch on classroom deliveries
  • Certificate of completion
  • Post-course application plan

Frequently asked questions

Participants should have some professional exposure to education, public administration, development programmes or institutional management. Formal policy training, economics qualifications and advanced statistical skills are not required.

Bring a current education challenge, draft policy, sector plan, programme concept or institutional issue if possible. Participants can use course templates with either their own material or a provided case.

It is designed for ministry staff, education programme managers, local authority leaders, development partner personnel, school-network leaders and policy advisers. It is most useful for professionals who influence decisions or implementation rather than classroom teaching alone.

This course focuses on system-level policy choices, reform design, financing, governance and implementation. Education leadership courses usually concentrate more directly on leading a school, faculty, department or institution.

Participants build a reform dossier around a current or realistic issue, using tools that can be adapted for policy papers, programme designs, budget submissions and implementation plans. The templates also support discussions with funders, senior leaders and delivery partners.

Each training day runs from 08:30 to 16:30 and provides about 6.5 contact hours. The first part develops system diagnosis and policy design, while the later modules focus on financing, implementation, monitoring and the final reform dossier.

Questions about this course?

Ask about dates, fees, group bookings or running it for your team. Our training team replies by email.