PPP Infrastructure Finance Training Course

Duration 5 days 10 modules · 33 contact hours
Level Intermediate Certificate on completion
Who attends PPP Unit Officials, Infrastructure Finance Managers and others
Fee from USD 1,100 KSh 95,000 for Kenyan organisations
Where 52 cities + online See dates by city
Next start 16 Nov 2026 Course code SD-PIF-017

Before you join: Participants should have working familiarity with infrastructure projects, public procurement, corporate finance, budgeting, investment appraisal or contract management.

Dates & prices

Two start dates a month in every city, and live online on weekdays or weekends. Fees are per participant; classroom fees include tuition, materials, lunch and refreshments, and the certificate.

Suggest a date or city

Showing the next six months. Later dates, other cities and private deliveries for your team are available on request.

Course overview

Public-private partnerships can deliver essential transport, energy, water, health, digital and social infrastructure where public budgets, technical capacity and service requirements must be balanced over long concession periods. However, poorly structured PPPs can create unaffordable payment commitments, misallocated risks, weak competition, refinancing disputes and contingent liabilities that emerge long after contract signature. Finance teams and project sponsors need a disciplined way to test whether a proposed PPP is justified, affordable, bankable and capable of protecting public value.

This course examines the financial structures, investment decisions and risk allocation principles used in PPP infrastructure projects. Participants assess project cash flows, construct and interpret financial models, compare funding sources, calculate debt service capacity, test value-for-money assumptions and evaluate investor returns. The course addresses availability-payment, user-pay, hybrid and concession models; construction and operating risks; equity and debt financing; guarantees; blended finance; refinancing; and fiscal-risk management. Participants also examine how lenders, investors, governments, development finance institutions and advisers assess a transaction before financial close.

Teaching combines focused instructor briefings with infrastructure case work, financial-model interpretation, risk-allocation discussions, procurement simulations and group review of financing proposals. Cases may include toll roads, municipal water treatment plants, hospital facilities, renewable-energy projects and digital infrastructure. Participants leave with a reusable PPP financial assessment pack containing a project screening framework, risk-allocation matrix, debt-capacity analysis, affordability test and lender due-diligence checklist. The course is delivered over five days, from 08:30 to 16:30, in classroom locations across 50+ cities or live online. Participants receive a certificate of completion.

The course is designed for public-sector officials, infrastructure sponsors, lenders, investors, advisers and procurement professionals who contribute to PPP planning, appraisal, financing, negotiation or contract management.

What you will be able to do

  • Assess PPP project bankability using affordability, risk allocation and lender criteria
  • Construct project cash flow forecasts for availability-payment and user-pay concessions
  • Evaluate debt capacity using DSCR, LLCR, repayment profiles and cash flow waterfalls
  • Compare equity, commercial debt, development finance and blended-finance funding structures
  • Allocate construction, demand, operating, regulatory and force-majeure risks between parties
  • Calculate project returns using IRR, NPV, equity cash flows and sensitivity analysis
  • Prepare a value-for-money assessment using public-sector comparator and lifecycle cost assumptions
  • Review PPP financing proposals using a structured lender and investor due-diligence process

Benefits of attending

For you

  • Judge whether a proposed PPP is financeable before entering procurement
  • Challenge financial advisers using DSCR, IRR, affordability and sensitivity evidence
  • Contribute credibly to negotiations on tariffs, guarantees, payment mechanisms and refinancing
  • Identify fiscal commitments and contingent liabilities before contract signature
  • Build a practical foundation for PPP unit, infrastructure finance and advisory roles

For your organisation

  • Improve early screening of PPP proposals before costly transaction preparation
  • Reduce exposure to unaffordable availability payments and unpriced contingent liabilities
  • Produce tender structures that attract credible lenders and long-term investors
  • Strengthen challenge of financial-model assumptions submitted by bidders and advisers
  • Create more consistent risk allocation across infrastructure procurement programmes

Course modules

10 modules over 5 days

Participants can determine whether a proposed infrastructure project is suitable for PPP procurement.

  • PPP project cycle from strategic need through contract expiry
  • Public-sector comparators distinguish conventional procurement costs from PPP whole-life costs
  • PPP Reference Guide concepts: value drivers, risks, institutions, finance
  • Project scope translated into output specifications and measurable service standards
  • Affordability, value for money, and bankability tested as separate gates
  • Stakeholder mapping identifies approval authorities, users, regulators, and affected communities
  • Greenfield, brownfield, and service-concession structures compared against policy objectives

Participants can select revenue and payment mechanisms suited to project demand and public-policy objectives.

  • Availability-payment mechanisms link deductions to asset and service performance
  • User-pay concessions allocate demand risk through tariffs, tolls, or fees
  • Hybrid revenue structures combine public payments with third-party customer revenues
  • Minimum revenue guarantees shift defined demand downside to government
  • Tariff-setting formulas address inflation, affordability, indexation, and regulatory approval
  • Payment deductions calibrated through performance indicators, cure periods, and caps
  • Revenue forecasts tested against demand elasticity, competition, and service alternatives

Participants can develop a risk allocation that supports public value and lender confidence.

  • Risk matrix assigns ownership to the party controlling probability and impact
  • Construction risk covers design errors, cost overruns, delays, and interface failures
  • Demand risk assessed using traffic, consumption, occupancy, and willingness-to-pay evidence
  • Operating risk includes lifecycle costs, performance failures, and maintenance obligations
  • Change-in-law clauses distinguish general, discriminatory, and specific legal changes
  • Force-majeure provisions allocate relief, compensation, termination, and insurance recoveries
  • Lender step-in rights protect continuity after serious private-partner default

Participants can interpret project finance cash flows and the main drivers of financial viability.

  • Project finance relies primarily on contracted project cash flows
  • Sources-and-uses schedule reconciles construction costs, fees, reserves, and funding
  • Operating model forecasts revenues, operating expenditure, maintenance, and lifecycle renewals
  • Cash flow waterfall prioritises taxes, operating costs, debt service, reserves, distributions
  • Debt-service reserve accounts protect scheduled repayments during temporary cash shortfalls
  • Base-case assumptions documented through model inputs, sources, and approval controls
  • Scenario analysis isolates consequences of delay, inflation, demand, and cost changes

Participants can assess debt capacity, lender requirements and financing terms for PPP projects.

  • DSCR measures cash available for debt service against scheduled debt payments
  • LLCR compares discounted project cash flows with outstanding debt balance
  • Debt sculpting aligns repayment profiles with forecast cash available for debt service
  • Interest-rate structures compare fixed, floating, hedged, and inflation-linked debt
  • Credit committees assess contract strength, sponsor support, and downside resilience
  • Security packages include project assets, shares, accounts, assignments, and insurances
  • Direct agreements define lender notice, cure, substitution, and step-in arrangements

Participants can evaluate equity returns and investor considerations within a PPP capital structure.

  • Equity sponsors accept residual risk after operating costs and debt service
  • Equity IRR calculated from invested capital, distributions, and exit proceeds
  • NPV analysis compares discounted returns against required investor hurdle rates
  • Sponsor return expectations reflect construction risk, country risk, and liquidity
  • Dividend lock-up provisions restrict distributions following covenant breach or default
  • Refinancing gains shared through contractual formulas between authority and private partner
  • Exit strategies consider share transfers, lock-up periods, and consent requirements

Participants can evaluate PPP affordability, fiscal risk and value-for-money evidence for public approval.

  • Affordability analysis matches payment commitments against multiyear budget ceilings
  • Public-sector comparator estimates risk-adjusted conventional procurement lifecycle costs
  • Value-for-money assessment compares service outcomes, risk transfer, costs, and flexibility
  • Contingent liabilities arise from guarantees, termination payments, and revenue support
  • PFRAM identifies fiscal exposures under adverse project and macroeconomic scenarios
  • Termination-payment formulas determine public liabilities following contract failure
  • Budget disclosure tracks committed payments, guarantees, and material fiscal risks

Participants can identify when concessional and development finance can improve project viability.

  • Blended finance combines public, commercial, philanthropic, and development capital
  • Development finance institutions provide loans, guarantees, political-risk insurance, and equity
  • Viability-gap funding addresses justified capital shortfalls without distorting incentives
  • Credit enhancement improves debt terms through guarantees, subordinated capital, or reserves
  • Political-risk insurance addresses expropriation, transfer restrictions, and political violence
  • Climate finance supports eligible mitigation, adaptation, resilience, and emissions-reduction investments
  • Concessionality assessed against additionality, market distortion, and public-value criteria

Participants can align PPP procurement stages with the information and commitments required by financiers.

  • Market sounding tests investor appetite, risk concerns, and financing capacity
  • Request-for-qualification criteria screen technical capability, financial strength, and relevant experience
  • Bid evaluation separates technical quality, commercial terms, and financial credibility
  • Financial model audit checks formulas, assumptions, consistency, and model integrity
  • Conditions precedent govern permits, land rights, approvals, insurance, and funding
  • Financial close occurs when financing documents become effective and funds become available
  • Bidder dialogue manages clarifications without compromising procurement transparency or competition

Participants can monitor financial performance and plan informed interventions during the concession period.

  • Contract-management dashboards track service levels, deductions, payments, and dispute trends
  • Early-warning indicators identify covenant pressure, cost escalation, and construction delay
  • Independent engineer reports test progress, quality, completion, and payment milestones
  • Renegotiation protocols document triggers, options appraisal, approvals, and public disclosure
  • Refinancing reviews assess savings, risk changes, fees, and gain-sharing obligations
  • Portfolio reporting aggregates payment commitments, contingent liabilities, and project performance
  • Application plan prioritises finance actions for a current PPP opportunity

Exercises and examples are adapted to each cohort's sectors and roles.

What you take back to work

  1. PPP project screening framework
  2. Risk allocation matrix
  3. Project finance cash flow model
  4. Debt capacity and covenant analysis template
  5. Value-for-money assessment checklist
  6. Lender and investor due-diligence checklist

Who should attend

  • PPP Unit Officials — assess project affordability, bankability and long-term fiscal exposure
  • Infrastructure Finance Managers — structure funding plans and evaluate project cash flow assumptions
  • Public Procurement Leaders — align tender documentation with financeable risk allocation
  • Commercial Bankers — assess debt capacity, security packages and lender due diligence
  • Infrastructure Investors — evaluate equity returns, downside cases and concession terms
  • Technical and Financial Advisers — support clients through PPP appraisal, tendering and financial close

Skills and tools covered

PPP financial modellingRisk allocationDebt capacity analysisValue-for-money assessmentProject finance structuringFiscal risk management

Tools and standards

World Bank PPP Reference Guide, PPP Fiscal Risk Assessment Model (PFRAM), Public-Sector Comparator, Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR)

How the course runs

Training methodology

The course uses short instructor briefings to establish PPP finance concepts, followed by case-based analysis of realistic infrastructure transactions. Participants interpret simplified financial models, compare funding structures, analyse risk matrices and assess lender decision criteria. Group exercises examine affordability, debt-service capacity, payment mechanisms and negotiation trade-offs. Simulations place participants in public-authority, lender and sponsor roles during financing discussions. Each participant develops an application plan linking course methods to a current or planned PPP project.

Requirements and prerequisites

Participants should have working familiarity with infrastructure projects, public procurement, corporate finance, budgeting, investment appraisal or contract management. They should be comfortable reading financial statements and using basic concepts such as revenue, operating cost, debt, interest and cash flow. Prior experience with PPP transactions is helpful but not required. The course does not assume advanced financial modelling, specialist accounting qualifications, legal drafting experience or prior use of project-finance software. Participants will interpret financial models and calculations rather than build complex spreadsheet models from scratch.

A typical training day

08:30 – 10:30First session
10:30 – 10:45Refreshment break
10:45 – 12:30Second session
12:30 – 13:30Lunch and networking
13:30 – 15:00Third session
15:00 – 15:15Refreshment break
15:15 – 16:30Workshop and daily review

Live online deliveries follow the same structure in East Africa Time, with shorter screen blocks and longer breaks.

What the fee includes

  • Instruction by a practitioner facilitator
  • Full course workbook and materials
  • Exercise files, templates and case studies
  • Refreshments and lunch on classroom deliveries
  • Certificate of completion
  • Post-course application plan

Frequently asked questions

Participants need familiarity with basic finance, infrastructure projects, procurement or contract management. Advanced spreadsheet modelling, legal qualifications and previous PPP deal experience are not required.

Participants should bring a laptop if attending in person, as financial-model interpretation and case materials may be reviewed electronically. A current or planned infrastructure project is useful for the application-planning component, but it is not mandatory.

The course suits public-sector PPP officials, infrastructure finance teams, procurement leaders, bankers, investors and advisers. It is particularly relevant for people reviewing, structuring or approving medium- to long-term infrastructure contracts.

General project finance courses commonly focus on private-sector transactions and corporate investment decisions. This course addresses the public-authority side of PPPs, including value for money, fiscal commitments, procurement, public payment mechanisms and contract-based risk allocation.

Participants can use the screening framework to review proposed PPPs before procurement and use the risk matrix to challenge contract allocation. The affordability, debt-capacity and due-diligence tools can also support reviews of bidder submissions and adviser reports.

The five days provide approximately 32.5 contact hours, usually delivered from 08:30 to 16:30. Time is divided between structured teaching, case analysis, group exercises, financing simulations and application planning.

Questions about this course?

Ask about dates, fees, group bookings or running it for your team. Our training team replies by email.