Urban Infrastructure Planning Training Course

Participants can translate a land-use concept into coordinated infrastructure requirements.

• Land-use plans tested against infrastructure carrying capacity and service catchments
• Density scenarios calculated using gross-to-net ratios and plot yield assumptions
• Transit-oriented development principles applied to station-area housing schemes
• Street hierarchies linked with emergency access, freight movement and walkability
• Utility corridors reserved within layouts before plot subdivision and construction
• Social infrastructure catchments sized for schools, clinics, parks and markets

Participants can prepare a demand baseline and forecast for infrastructure investment planning.

• Baseline datasets assembled from census, utility, cadastral and mobility records
• Population projections built using cohort-component and household formation assumptions
• Water demand estimated from per-capita consumption and non-revenue water factors
• Peak wastewater flows calculated using dry-weather and infiltration allowances
• Transport trip generation estimated by land use, mode share and occupancy
• Demand scenarios stress-tested for delayed occupancy and informal settlement growth

Participants can specify coordinated site-servicing requirements and critical network interfaces.

• Water supply options compared through source yield, pressure and storage requirements
• Gravity sewer layouts checked against topography, gradients and downstream capacity
• Stormwater systems designed using rational method parameters and detention storage
• Electricity loads forecast from dwelling typologies, diversity factors and connections
• Solid waste collection planned around access geometry, storage and transfer points
• Utility interface register records approvals, tie-ins, dependencies and ownership

Participants can integrate mobility and public-realm investments into housing infrastructure plans.

• Complete Streets principles applied to housing access roads and collector corridors
• Pedestrian catchments measured using network distance rather than straight lines
• Public transport service plans matched with density, frequency and interchange demand
• Parking requirements tested against affordability, mode share and land consumption
• Universal design requirements incorporated into crossings, footways and public facilities
• Public realm maintenance responsibilities assigned through asset ownership schedules

Participants can incorporate climate, environmental and disaster-risk measures into infrastructure options.

• Climate risk screening uses hazard, exposure and vulnerability assessment matrices
• Flood pathways mapped from catchment topography, drainage failures and blocked outfalls
• Nature-based drainage compared with conventional pipes using lifecycle cost criteria
• Heat mitigation planned through canopy cover, cool materials and shaded routes
• Environmental and social impact assessment scoping identifies priority receptors early
• Resettlement risks screened using land acquisition, displacement and livelihood criteria

Participants can sequence infrastructure packages around development triggers and delivery dependencies.

• Critical path method identifies enabling works, approvals and network connection dependencies
• Phasing plans link housing completions with service capacity commissioning milestones
• Trigger-based infrastructure schedules define thresholds for developer and municipal works
• Temporary services assessed against transition costs, safety and asset compatibility
• Interface management plans assign control of boundaries between contract packages
• Implementation schedules integrate procurement lead times, permits and utility outages

Participants can estimate capital and lifecycle costs for integrated infrastructure alternatives.

• Work breakdown structures separate land, networks, buildings and professional services
• Quantity-based estimates use unit rates, contingencies and escalation assumptions
• Lifecycle cost analysis includes renewals, operations, maintenance and residual values
• Net present value compares infrastructure options over defined asset lives
• Cost benchmarks normalized by dwelling, hectare, connection and service population
• Optimism bias allowances applied to early-stage cost estimates and schedules

Participants can assess household affordability and identify appropriate subsidy mechanisms.

• Household affordability ratios test housing, utility and transport payment burdens
• Willingness-to-pay evidence distinguished from ability-to-pay household income data
• Tariff structures compared using fixed charges, volumetric rates and lifeline blocks
• Capital subsidies separated from operating subsidies and targeted support mechanisms
• Cross-subsidy options assessed across land uses, customer classes and service areas
• Fiscal commitments recorded through multi-year budget and contingent liability schedules

Participants can assemble realistic funding plans for public and shared infrastructure.

• Municipal revenue sources assessed through own-source income and intergovernmental transfers
• Capital investment plans prioritize projects using strategic fit and readiness criteria
• Development charges calculated from attributable infrastructure costs and growth forecasts
• Land value capture instruments compared for legal basis and collection timing
• Municipal bonds evaluated against revenue pledges, debt limits and credit quality
• Blended finance structures combine grants, debt, equity and viability-gap funding

Participants can screen urban infrastructure projects and recommend a justified delivery option.

• Project concept notes define service problem, beneficiaries and measurable outputs
• Multi-criteria analysis ranks options using cost, equity, resilience and feasibility
• Theory of change connects infrastructure interventions with intended development outcomes
• Economic appraisal distinguishes financial cash flows from economic costs and benefits
• Value-for-money screening compares public procurement with potential PPP arrangements
• Gateway reviews test strategic case, affordability, readiness and market interest

Participants can select a PPP model suited to project revenues and public service obligations.

• Management, lease, concession and availability-payment models compared systematically
• Design-build-finance-maintain structures matched to asset condition and payment certainty
• User-pay revenues assessed for collection risk, tariff control and demand volatility
• Availability payments specified through service outputs, deductions and indexation
• Hybrid PPP structures combine public capital grants with private operating obligations
• Unsolicited proposal risks addressed through transparent competitive procurement procedures

Participants can develop a risk allocation matrix and core contractual protections.

• Risk register identifies probability, impact, owner, mitigation and residual exposure
• Construction risk allocated through design responsibility, completion tests and damages
• Demand risk assessed against occupancy, tariff policy and competing service providers
• Force majeure provisions distinguish relief events, compensation and termination rights
• Change-in-law mechanisms address cost impacts and regulatory responsibility
• Performance regimes connect key performance indicators with deductions and remedies

Participants can build and interpret a project-level PPP financial model.

• Model structure separates assumptions, calculations, outputs and sensitivity cases
• Sources-and-uses schedules reconcile construction cost, financing fees and contingencies
• Operating cash flows model revenues, expenses, renewals and working capital
• Debt service coverage ratio calculated from cash available for debt service
• Equity returns measured using internal rate of return and distributions
• Sensitivity analysis tests inflation, demand, capex, interest rates and delays

Participants can identify bankability gaps and prepare actions to address them.

• Bankability assessment reviews revenue certainty, counterparties, permits and security
• Lender due diligence covers technical, legal, environmental and insurance evidence
• Direct agreements define lender step-in rights and cure periods
• Credit enhancement options include guarantees, escrow accounts and payment reserves
• Termination payment formulas address debt, equity and default scenarios
• Financial close conditions tracked through a responsibilities and evidence register

Participants can plan a transparent procurement process and targeted market engagement.

• Procurement routes selected using project complexity, competition and preparation maturity
• Market sounding tests bidder appetite, risk concerns and financing capacity
• Request for qualification criteria assess technical, financial and relevant experience
• Request for proposal documents specify outputs, payment mechanisms and evaluation rules
• Bid evaluation models combine quality, price, risk and deliverability scores
• Negotiation protocols preserve competition, audit trails and approval authority

Participants can establish governance and engagement arrangements for complex urban projects.

• Stakeholder mapping identifies influence, interest, rights, concerns and engagement methods
• Community engagement plans schedule disclosure, consultation, feedback and grievance channels
• Interagency steering committees define decisions, memberships, escalation and reporting
• Project governance charters clarify sponsor, accountable owner and delegated authorities
• Gender and social inclusion analysis identifies differential access and safety impacts
• Landowner negotiations documented through transparent valuation and compensation procedures

Participants can monitor construction delivery across multiple infrastructure contracts and interfaces.

• Integrated master schedules coordinate housing works, utilities and public infrastructure
• Interface registers track design inputs, access conditions and acceptance boundaries
• Earned value management measures planned value, earned value and actual cost
• Change control procedures assess scope, cost, schedule and approval consequences
• Quality assurance plans define inspections, tests, records and nonconformance actions
• Commissioning plans sequence testing, handover, training and operational readiness

Participants can define operational performance, asset management and contract-monitoring arrangements.

• ISO 55000 principles link asset objectives, lifecycle plans and decision evidence
• Asset registers capture location, condition, criticality, ownership and replacement dates
• Service level agreements define response times, availability and customer standards
• Key performance indicators track continuity, losses, safety and complaint resolution
• Independent engineer roles verify construction, testing and operating performance
• Contract management plans govern notices, claims, payment and performance reviews

Participants can build, review and present a complete integrated urban infrastructure investment and PPP procurement proposal.

• Development brief defines target households, land use, density and service objectives
• Integrated infrastructure plan coordinates site works, trunk systems and social facilities
• Lifecycle cost model establishes capital, operating, renewal and contingency requirements
• Funding strategy combines municipal resources, developer contributions and private finance
• PPP option appraisal recommends delivery model, payment mechanism and risk allocation
• Procurement roadmap schedules approvals, market engagement, tendering and financial close