Cost Benefit Analysis for Water Investments Training Course

Duration 5 days 10 modules · 33 contact hours
Level Intermediate Certificate on completion
Who attends Water and sanitation project managers, Infrastructure economists and analysts and others
Fee from USD 1,100 KSh 95,000 for Kenyan organisations
Where 52 cities + online See dates by city
Next start 16 Nov 2026 Course code SD-WS-034

Before you join: Participants should understand basic project budgeting, spreadsheet use and the purpose of discounted cash flow.

Dates & prices

Two start dates a month in every city, and live online on weekdays or weekends. Fees are per participant; classroom fees include tuition, materials, lunch and refreshments, and the certificate.

Suggest a date or city

Showing the next six months. Later dates, other cities and private deliveries for your team are available on request.

Course overview

Water supply, sanitation, irrigation, flood resilience and watershed investments often require large upfront expenditure while benefits accrue over many years and to different groups. Decision makers need evidence that distinguishes financial cash flows from economic value, tests affordability, prices health and time savings carefully, and makes uncertainty visible. Poor appraisal can understate maintenance needs, double-count benefits, overlook environmental costs, or favour projects that perform poorly under drought, demand shortfalls or energy-price increases.

This course equips participants to prepare and review cost-benefit analyses for water and sanitation investments. Participants define the counterfactual, establish appraisal boundaries, identify incremental costs and benefits, and build discounted cash-flow models using net present value, benefit-cost ratio and economic internal rate of return. The course addresses lifecycle costing, shadow pricing, willingness to pay, avoided health costs, consumer surplus, environmental externalities, distributional effects, climate risk and sensitivity analysis. Participants also learn when multi-criteria analysis is needed alongside monetised economic evidence.

Teaching combines focused instructor briefings with water-sector cases, spreadsheet-based modelling, group analysis and decision simulations. Cases cover rural water supply, urban sanitation, non-revenue water reduction, irrigation modernisation, flood protection and emergency WASH choices. Each participant develops a reusable water-investment appraisal workbook, benefit register, assumption log and decision-briefing structure for use on live proposals. The five-day course is available as classroom delivery in 50+ cities or live online, runs from 08:30 to 16:30 each day, and includes a certificate of completion.

The course is designed for professionals who commission, prepare, fund, regulate or scrutinise water-sector investments and need to turn technical, financial and social evidence into defensible investment recommendations.

What you will be able to do

  • Define appraisal boundaries, counterfactuals and stakeholder incidence for water investments
  • Construct lifecycle cost models covering capital, operating, renewal and residual costs
  • Value health, time, reliability, agricultural and environmental benefits using appropriate methods
  • Distinguish financial analysis from economic analysis using shadow prices and conversion factors
  • Calculate net present value, benefit-cost ratio and economic internal rate of return
  • Test investment recommendations through sensitivity analysis, scenarios and Monte Carlo simulation
  • Assess affordability, distributional impacts, environmental externalities and safeguard risks
  • Prepare an evidence-based cost-benefit analysis report and decision briefing

Benefits of attending

For you

  • Produce water-investment appraisals that withstand technical and funding review
  • Challenge unrealistic benefit claims, omitted costs and weak counterfactuals
  • Translate engineering and service data into economic decision evidence
  • Build transparent spreadsheet models for capital planning and project selection
  • Present uncertainty, affordability and equity trade-offs credibly to decision makers

For your organisation

  • Improves selection of water investments with stronger economic and social returns
  • Reduces approval risk from incomplete lifecycle costs and unsupported benefits
  • Creates consistent appraisal evidence across utility, government and donor proposals
  • Strengthens budget prioritisation under climate, demand and financing uncertainty
  • Documents distributional and environmental effects for accountable public investment decisions

Course modules

10 modules over 5 days

Participants can define the decision context, counterfactual and appraisal boundaries for a water investment.

  • Decision context, theory of change, and appraisal questions for water projects
  • Stakeholder mapping separates beneficiaries, payers, duty bearers, and affected groups
  • Define with-without and before-after cases to avoid attribution errors
  • Service-chain mapping traces source, treatment, conveyance, use, and disposal
  • Problem trees convert service failures into measurable economic consequences
  • Distributional incidence identifies who receives benefits, bears costs, and faces risks
  • Appraisal boundaries distinguish project, programme, basin, and national perspectives

Participants can develop an incremental lifecycle cost model for a water-sector proposal.

  • Resource costing uses quantities, unit rates, price bases, and timing
  • Capital expenditure distinguishes construction, land, engineering, supervision, and contingencies
  • Operating expenditure separates energy, chemicals, labour, repairs, and administration
  • Lifecycle costing schedules rehabilitation, asset replacement, residual value, and decommissioning
  • Opportunity cost values donated land, volunteer labour, and diverted water
  • Transfer payments distinguish taxes, subsidies, tariffs, grants, and debt service
  • Incremental costs compare proposed service arrangements against the counterfactual

Participants can select and apply suitable methods to value principal water-sector benefits.

  • Health benefits value avoided disease using burden-of-disease and cost-of-illness methods
  • Time savings quantify collection, queuing, travel, and productive-use changes
  • Productivity gains separate absenteeism reductions from wage and employment effects
  • Water reliability benefits measure avoided coping costs and interruption losses
  • Agricultural benefits estimate yield, cropping, and input changes under irrigation
  • Environmental services value ecosystem changes through stated and revealed preferences
  • Benefit transfer tests study similarity, unit values, and income adjustments

Participants can estimate demand-side benefits while testing household affordability and payment assumptions.

  • Household surveys define service levels, use patterns, and expenditure baselines
  • Contingent valuation elicits willingness to pay using credible service scenarios
  • Choice experiments estimate attribute values for reliability, quality, and connection
  • Revealed preference uses coping expenditure, travel cost, and hedonic evidence
  • Demand curves distinguish consumer surplus from tariff revenue and collections
  • Affordability analysis applies expenditure shares, poverty data, and payment schedules
  • Sampling plans address seasonality, nonresponse, recall bias, and enumerator effects

Participants can convert financial project data into an economic appraisal using appropriate price adjustments.

  • Financial analysis records cash flows, tariffs, grants, loans, and taxes
  • Economic analysis applies shadow prices to real resource consumption and outputs
  • Standard conversion factors adjust market prices where detailed factors unavailable
  • Shadow wage rates account for unemployment, informality, and foregone output
  • Border parity pricing values tradable equipment, fuel, chemicals, and materials
  • Foreign exchange premiums capture scarcity costs in import-dependent investment programmes
  • Tariff forecasts reconcile utility revenue requirements with household affordability constraints

Participants can calculate and interpret core economic appraisal indicators for competing alternatives.

  • Real and nominal cash flows remain consistent with selected discount rates
  • Discounted cash flow models calculate net present value and benefit-cost ratio
  • Internal rate of return interpretation identifies multiple-rate and reinvestment limitations
  • Discount-rate selection considers public guidance, project duration, and intergenerational effects
  • Residual values reflect remaining asset service potential at appraisal close
  • Spreadsheet audit checks signs, timing, units, formulas, and source links
  • Decision rules compare mutually exclusive alternatives using incremental net benefits

Participants can test whether investment recommendations remain valid under uncertain future conditions.

  • Switching values identify assumptions that reverse investment recommendations
  • One-way sensitivity analysis ranks inputs through tornado diagrams
  • Scenario analysis combines drought, demand, energy, and construction assumptions
  • Monte Carlo simulation models correlated uncertainty using probability distributions
  • Risk registers assign owners, controls, triggers, and residual ratings
  • Climate stress testing examines hydrology, flood exposure, and asset performance
  • Real-options thinking values staged investment under unresolved demand uncertainty

Participants can incorporate non-market impacts, equity considerations and safeguards into appraisal findings.

  • External cost assessment addresses pollution, abstraction, greenhouse gases, and biodiversity
  • Distributional weights test welfare impacts across income groups and locations
  • Gender analysis identifies time burdens, safety exposure, and decision rights
  • Safeguard screening recognises resettlement, indigenous peoples, and downstream impacts
  • Equity objectives distinguish aggregate efficiency from pro-poor service priorities
  • Multi-criteria analysis structures non-monetised criteria alongside economic evidence
  • Ethical valuation documents limits, uncertainty, and affected-community perspectives

Participants can adapt appraisal methods to common water, sanitation and resilience investment cases.

  • Rural water supply appraisals compare point sources, piped systems, and maintenance models
  • Urban sanitation analysis traces containment, emptying, transport, treatment, and reuse
  • Non-revenue water projects value production savings, deferred capacity, and service reliability
  • Flood resilience investments estimate avoided damages using exceedance probability curves
  • Irrigation modernisation weighs farm benefits against environmental flow requirements
  • Emergency WASH decisions use rapid assumptions, thresholds, and staged appraisal
  • Portfolio ranking applies budget constraints, complementarities, and implementation readiness

Participants can present transparent cost-benefit evidence and plan its use in investment decisions.

  • Appraisal reports state recommendation, assumptions, evidence quality, and decision conditions
  • Results tables present undiscounted flows, discounted values, and key indicators
  • Benefit registers link valuation methods, data sources, owners, and update dates
  • Assumption logs record rationale, uncertainty ranges, and approval status
  • Independent review checks counterfactuals, double counting, optimism bias, and arithmetic
  • Decision briefings explain trade-offs without obscuring distributional consequences
  • Application plans set data actions, review gates, and reporting milestones

Exercises and examples are adapted to each cohort's sectors and roles.

What you take back to work

  1. Water investment cost-benefit analysis workbook
  2. Lifecycle cost model template
  3. Water-sector benefit valuation register
  4. Sensitivity and scenario analysis model
  5. Appraisal assumption and evidence log
  6. Investment decision briefing template

Who should attend

  • Water and sanitation project managers — need defensible investment cases before implementation approval
  • Infrastructure economists and analysts — prepare economic appraisals for water-sector programmes
  • Government planning officers — compare public investment proposals against budget and welfare objectives
  • Development bank and donor staff — review appraisal assumptions, results and financing requests
  • Utility finance and asset managers — assess tariffs, renewal costs and service-improvement options
  • NGO programme managers — justify WASH programme choices using transparent economic evidence

Skills and tools covered

Economic appraisalLifecycle costingBenefit valuationDiscounted cash flowRisk analysisInvestment reporting

Tools and standards

WHO/UNICEF JMP service ladders, OECD DAC evaluation criteria, Monte Carlo simulation, Microsoft Excel

How the course runs

Training methodology

The course uses short instructor briefings to establish economic appraisal methods, followed by water-sector case work, spreadsheet modelling, group exercises and decision simulations. Participants work with realistic evidence on service levels, tariffs, health outcomes, energy use, asset replacement and hydrological risk. Facilitated reviews test assumptions, counterfactuals and valuation choices from the perspective of project sponsors and independent reviewers. Application planning helps participants adapt the templates and methods to an active or forthcoming water investment.

Requirements and prerequisites

Participants should understand basic project budgeting, spreadsheet use and the purpose of discounted cash flow. Experience with water, sanitation, irrigation, environmental management, infrastructure finance or public investment planning is helpful. Participants should be able to read tables of costs, quantities and service data and discuss project assumptions with technical colleagues. Prior cost-benefit analysis experience is not required. Advanced economics, econometrics, programming and specialist hydrological modelling are not required. The course explains the economic concepts needed for water-investment appraisal before applying them.

A typical training day

08:30 – 10:30First session
10:30 – 10:45Refreshment break
10:45 – 12:30Second session
12:30 – 13:30Lunch and networking
13:30 – 15:00Third session
15:00 – 15:15Refreshment break
15:15 – 16:30Workshop and daily review

Live online deliveries follow the same structure in East Africa Time, with shorter screen blocks and longer breaks.

What the fee includes

  • Instruction by a practitioner facilitator
  • Full course workbook and materials
  • Exercise files, templates and case studies
  • Refreshments and lunch on classroom deliveries
  • Certificate of completion
  • Post-course application plan

Frequently asked questions

Participants need basic spreadsheet confidence and familiarity with project budgets or service data. Previous cost-benefit analysis training is helpful but not required, and the course does not assume advanced economics or econometrics.

Bring a laptop with spreadsheet software for modelling activities and, where permitted, a current or recent water investment proposal. Useful materials include cost estimates, demand forecasts, tariff data, service-level data or project approval templates.

It suits staff involved in planning, financing, appraising, approving or reviewing water and sanitation investments. Typical participants work for utilities, ministries, municipalities, donors, development banks, NGOs and infrastructure programmes.

Project finance focuses primarily on funding structures, cash generation and financial viability. This course examines economic welfare, public benefits, health outcomes, affordability, externalities, equity and uncertainty specific to water investments.

Participants can use the appraisal workbook, benefit register and assumption log to review a live project or prepare a new investment case. The methods also support stronger challenge sessions with engineers, finance teams, donors and approving authorities.

The course runs from 08:30 to 16:30 daily, with about 6.5 contact hours each day. Time is divided among instructor briefings, sector cases, spreadsheet work, facilitated analysis, simulations and application planning.

Questions about this course?

Ask about dates, fees, group bookings or running it for your team. Our training team replies by email.