Investment Dispute Prevention and Resolution Training Course

Duration 5 days 10 modules · 33 contact hours
Level Intermediate Certificate on completion
Who attends In-house Counsel, Government Lawyers and others
Fee from USD 1,100 KSh 95,000 for Kenyan organisations
Where 52 cities + online See dates by city
Next start 16 Nov 2026 Course code SD-L-075

Before you join: Participants should have working experience with commercial contracts, cross-border projects, regulation, public administration, legal claims, or dispute management.

Dates & prices

Two start dates a month in every city, and live online on weekdays or weekends. Fees are per participant; classroom fees include tuition, materials, lunch and refreshments, and the certificate.

Suggest a date or city

Showing the next six months. Later dates, other cities and private deliveries for your team are available on request.

Course overview

Investment disputes can arise long before a notice of arbitration is filed: during licensing delays, tax assessments, regulatory change, payment disputes, joint-venture breakdowns, expropriation claims, or disagreements over stabilisation commitments. Poorly managed disputes can interrupt projects, increase legal costs, damage government or investor relationships, and expose organisations to treaty claims or contested enforcement proceedings. Legal, commercial and public-sector teams need a disciplined approach to identifying dispute risk, preserving options, and choosing proportionate resolution routes.

This course examines investment dispute prevention and resolution under investment treaties, investment contracts, and investor-State dispute settlement mechanisms. Participants assess jurisdiction, admissibility, treaty protections, contract claims, damages, evidence, and enforcement risk. They learn to distinguish commercial arbitration from treaty arbitration, prepare an early dispute assessment, manage notices and consultations, structure settlement discussions, and instruct external counsel effectively. The programme addresses ICSID, UNCITRAL and ad hoc proceedings, alongside mediation and negotiated settlement.

Teaching combines short legal briefings with treaty and contract analysis, case work, facilitated group exercises, procedural simulations, and application planning. Participants work with realistic scenarios involving infrastructure concessions, energy investments, mining licences, public procurement, financial services regulation, and cross-border joint ventures. Each participant leaves with a reusable investment dispute prevention and response pack, including a risk register, early case assessment template, evidence preservation checklist, consultation plan, and settlement decision model.

The course is suited to lawyers, contract managers, public officials, investment promotion professionals, project leaders, claims specialists, and managers responsible for cross-border investments or government-facing projects.

What you will be able to do

  • Assess investment dispute exposure using treaty, contract, regulatory and factual risk indicators
  • Determine jurisdictional routes under ICSID, UNCITRAL and contractual arbitration provisions
  • Interpret fair and equitable treatment, expropriation, national treatment and MFN standards
  • Prepare an early case assessment covering merits, quantum, evidence and procedural options
  • Design dispute prevention controls for investment contracts, licences and regulatory decisions
  • Manage notices of dispute, consultation periods, document preservation and counsel instructions
  • Evaluate mediation, negotiated settlement and arbitration using structured decision criteria
  • Develop an investment dispute response plan with governance, milestones and reporting lines

Benefits of attending

For you

  • Recognise treaty and contract issues before they become formal claims
  • Contribute confidently to early case assessments and legal strategy meetings
  • Prepare clearer instructions, document requests and factual chronologies for external counsel
  • Assess when consultation, mediation or arbitration offers the stronger route
  • Build practical experience relevant to cross-border investment and public-sector disputes

For your organisation

  • Earlier identification of investment dispute exposure and preventable claim triggers
  • Better preservation of records needed for jurisdiction, merits and damages defences
  • More consistent handling of notices, consultations and internal escalation decisions
  • Stronger control of external counsel instructions, budgets and procedural priorities
  • Better-informed settlement decisions that account for legal, financial and policy risk

Course modules

10 modules over 5 days

Participants can identify the legal relationships, dispute routes and early risk indicators affecting an investment.

  • Foreign investment protection: treaty standards, contract rights, and domestic law
  • Investor-State dispute settlement architecture under ICSID, UNCITRAL, and ad hoc arbitration
  • Distinguishing commercial arbitration, treaty arbitration, diplomatic protection, and local litigation
  • Consent to arbitration through treaties, statutes, contracts, and investment agreements
  • Jurisdictional gateways: investor, investment, nationality, consent, timing, and fork-in-road clauses
  • Map stakeholders, decision rights, and escalation routes before disputes crystallise

Participants can analyse common treaty protections against a documented investment dispute scenario.

  • Treaty interpretation under Vienna Convention Articles 31 to 33
  • Fair and equitable treatment: legitimate expectations, due process, and arbitrariness
  • Indirect expropriation tests: substantial deprivation, police powers, and proportionality
  • National treatment and most-favoured-nation comparisons using appropriate comparators
  • Full protection and security obligations beyond physical security claims
  • Umbrella clauses, stabilisation provisions, and contractual commitments to investors

Participants can design practical controls that reduce dispute risk during investment implementation.

  • Draft dispute clauses with clear forums, governing law, and notice requirements
  • Stabilisation and change-in-law clauses allocated against identifiable regulatory risks
  • Create decision records supporting transparency, consistency, and procedural fairness
  • Regulatory impact assessments documenting purpose, evidence, alternatives, and proportionality
  • Contract administration controls for variations, approvals, payments, and performance notices
  • Issue registers linking operational events to legal obligations and response owners

Participants can test whether a proposed claim meets jurisdictional and admissibility requirements.

  • Assess investor nationality, corporate control, and denial-of-benefits provisions
  • Define protected investments using asset, contribution, duration, and risk indicators
  • Apply temporal scope rules to pre-treaty and continuing conduct
  • Cooling-off periods, negotiation clauses, and mandatory consultation requirements
  • Fork-in-the-road, waiver, and election provisions affecting parallel proceedings
  • Distinguish jurisdictional objections from admissibility and merits objections

Participants can prepare an early case assessment and evidence preservation plan for a potential dispute.

  • Build a fact chronology linking measures, communications, losses, and decisions
  • Early case assessment covering jurisdiction, merits, quantum, remedies, and costs
  • Legal hold notices for email, messaging, files, and project systems
  • Evidence matrices matching factual propositions to documents, witnesses, and experts
  • Witness preparation plans separating contemporaneous knowledge from reconstructed recollection
  • Privilege protocols for internal investigations and external counsel communications

Participants can manage the principal procedural steps from notice of dispute through hearing preparation.

  • Notice of dispute contents, service methods, and strategic reservation language
  • Requests for arbitration under ICSID Convention and UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules
  • Tribunal constitution, arbitrator challenges, disclosures, and conflicts analysis
  • Procedural Order No. 1: timetables, confidentiality, language, and hearing format
  • Written submissions structured around jurisdiction, liability, quantum, and relief
  • Document production using Redfern schedules and relevance-materiality tests

Participants can evaluate damages theories, valuation evidence and financial exposure in investment claims.

  • Damages principles: reparation, causation, foreseeability, mitigation, and valuation date
  • Discounted cash flow assumptions tested against operating history and market evidence
  • Comparable transactions, book value, and replacement cost valuation approaches
  • Scenario analysis for regulatory measures, project delays, and lost profits
  • Expert evidence instructions covering models, source data, and sensitivity tests
  • Challenge quantum claims through causation analysis and alternative counterfactuals

Participants can plan and conduct a structured process for consultation, mediation and settlement evaluation.

  • Consultation strategy defining objectives, authority limits, information, and communications
  • Interest-based negotiation separating legal positions from commercial and policy interests
  • Mediation preparation: mandate, participants, confidentiality, and settlement parameters
  • BATNA and WATNA analysis for arbitration, settlement, and continued negotiations
  • Settlement valuation models incorporating costs, delay, enforcement, and reputational exposure
  • Draft settlement terms addressing releases, confidentiality, payment, and implementation

Participants can assess post-award options and enforcement risks affecting an investment dispute strategy.

  • Tribunal remedies: damages, declarations, restitution, interest, and costs
  • ICSID annulment grounds and limited post-award correction procedures
  • New York Convention recognition and enforcement requirements for non-ICSID awards
  • Sovereign immunity distinctions between adjudication immunity and execution immunity
  • Asset tracing considerations before enforcement against State-owned or commercial assets
  • Post-award strategy balancing compliance, challenge, enforcement, and relationship management

Participants can establish a practical investment dispute response plan for their organisation.

  • Dispute response playbooks assigning legal, commercial, financial, and communications responsibilities
  • External counsel instructions defining scope, assumptions, budgets, and reporting requirements
  • Board and ministerial reporting using decision-focused risk and options papers
  • Lessons-learned reviews converting dispute findings into contract and policy controls
  • Portfolio heat maps prioritising investments by exposure, value, and dispute signals
  • Personal action plans applying course methods to current responsibilities

Exercises and examples are adapted to each cohort's sectors and roles.

What you take back to work

  1. Investment dispute risk register
  2. Early case assessment template
  3. Evidence preservation checklist
  4. Notice and consultation response plan
  5. Settlement decision model
  6. Investment dispute response playbook

Who should attend

  • In-house Counsel — manage treaty, contract and regulatory disputes affecting foreign investments
  • Government Lawyers — reduce exposure to investor-State claims and manage State responses
  • Contract Managers — identify dispute triggers within concessions, licences and investment agreements
  • Investment Promotion Officials — understand protections offered to investors and associated State obligations
  • Project Directors — maintain decision records and escalation controls during contested projects
  • Claims and Risk Managers — coordinate evidence, external counsel and settlement governance

Skills and tools covered

Treaty claim analysisDispute risk managementArbitration procedureEvidence preservationSettlement strategyDamages assessment

Tools and standards

ICSID Convention, UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence

How the course runs

Training methodology

The course uses short instructor briefings to establish legal concepts, followed by treaty extracts, investment contracts, procedural documents and reported case materials. Participants analyse fact patterns in groups, identify claims and defences, and prepare structured advice for management or public authorities. Simulations cover consultation meetings, counsel briefings and settlement decision meetings. Facilitated discussion compares procedural choices under ICSID and UNCITRAL rules. Individual application planning helps participants adapt the methods to their own investment portfolio, projects or regulatory responsibilities.

Requirements and prerequisites

Participants should have working experience with commercial contracts, cross-border projects, regulation, public administration, legal claims, or dispute management. Familiarity with arbitration clauses and contract interpretation is useful, but prior exposure to investment treaty arbitration is not required. The course assumes participants can read legal and commercial documents and discuss project facts in a structured way. It does not require a law degree, prior appearance in arbitration, quantitative damages modelling expertise, or knowledge of a particular national legal system.

A typical training day

08:30 – 10:30First session
10:30 – 10:45Refreshment break
10:45 – 12:30Second session
12:30 – 13:30Lunch and networking
13:30 – 15:00Third session
15:00 – 15:15Refreshment break
15:15 – 16:30Workshop and daily review

Live online deliveries follow the same structure in East Africa Time, with shorter screen blocks and longer breaks.

What the fee includes

  • Instruction by a practitioner facilitator
  • Full course workbook and materials
  • Exercise files, templates and case studies
  • Refreshments and lunch on classroom deliveries
  • Certificate of completion
  • Post-course application plan

Frequently asked questions

Participants should understand basic contracts, projects, regulation, or dispute handling. No prior experience of investment treaty arbitration or an advanced legal qualification is required.

Bring examples of non-confidential investment contracts, dispute clauses, licences, project issues, or internal escalation procedures if available. Participants may also bring current questions about treaty exposure, claims management, or settlement decisions.

It is designed for in-house lawyers, government lawyers, contract managers, investment officials, project directors, and claims or risk professionals. It is particularly relevant where foreign investment, concessions, regulated assets, or public authorities are involved.

General arbitration courses commonly focus on commercial disputes between private parties. This course concentrates on investor-State disputes, treaty protections, State measures, jurisdictional requirements, sovereign issues, and prevention controls for investments.

Participants can use the risk register, early case assessment template, evidence checklist, and response playbook when a dispute signal appears. The methods also support contract drafting, regulatory decision-making, project governance, and external counsel management.

The five days contain approximately 32.5 contact hours, delivered from 08:30 to 16:30 each day. Time is divided among legal briefings, document analysis, facilitated case work, procedural simulations, group discussion, and application planning.

Questions about this course?

Ask about dates, fees, group bookings or running it for your team. Our training team replies by email.