Course overview
Banks, insurers and financial-services firms operate under overlapping prudential, conduct, financial-crime, consumer-protection and data-protection requirements. Compliance failures can produce enforcement action, remediation costs, customer harm, capital impacts and personal accountability for senior managers. The practical challenge is translating regulatory obligations into controlled business processes, evidence, monitoring and timely escalation without treating compliance as a stand-alone legal function.
This course examines the regulatory architecture affecting banking and insurance operations and the methods used to manage compliance risk. Participants work with Basel III, FATF Recommendations, COSO and ISO 37301 while addressing governance, regulatory change, customer due diligence, sanctions, market conduct, complaints, prudential reporting, outsourcing and supervisory engagement. They learn to interpret obligations, map them to risks and controls, test control design and operating effectiveness, investigate incidents, prepare regulatory submissions and report meaningful management information.
Teaching combines focused instructor briefings with cases drawn from retail banking, corporate banking, payments, insurance underwriting and claims operations. Participants analyse regulatory scenarios, assess customer files, build risk-control matrices, review sample incidents and prepare responses for senior management and supervisors. Throughout the course, each participant develops a practical compliance framework for a selected business unit or regulated product. They leave with a structured compliance programme pack, including an obligations register, risk assessment, monitoring plan, control matrix, incident workflow and board-reporting format.
The course suits professionals who already work with regulated financial products, operational risk, internal controls, audit, legal, compliance or business management. It is particularly relevant where responsibilities span several jurisdictions or where teams need clearer ownership of regulatory duties and evidence standards.
