Land Policy and Governance Training Course

Duration 10 days 18 modules · 65 contact hours
Level Intermediate Certificate on completion
Who attends Land policy officers, Urban planners and others
Fee from USD 2,200 KSh 190,000 for Kenyan organisations
Where 52 cities + online See dates by city
Next start 16 Nov 2026 Course code SD-PP-016

Before you join: Participants should have practical exposure to public administration, urban planning, rural development, land administration, housing, infrastructure delivery or community development.

Dates & prices

Two start dates a month in every city, and live online on weekdays or weekends. Fees are per participant; classroom fees include tuition, materials, lunch and refreshments, and the certificate.

Suggest a date or city

Showing the next six months. Later dates, other cities and private deliveries for your team are available on request.

Course overview

Land policy decisions determine who can use land, under what conditions, for how long, and with what protection. Weak policy can produce informal settlements, insecure rural livelihoods, land speculation, forced displacement, stalled infrastructure projects, and disputes between communities, investors and public agencies. Strong governance creates clearer rights, fairer allocation, reliable records, accountable institutions and workable routes for resolving grievances.

This course equips participants to formulate, assess and implement urban and rural land policy. It examines land tenure systems, property rights, customary and statutory arrangements, land markets, valuation, taxation, land-use planning, compulsory acquisition, resettlement, public land management and dispute resolution. Participants use the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure, Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration and the Land Governance Assessment Framework to diagnose problems, define policy objectives, compare instruments and develop implementation arrangements.

Teaching combines short briefings with government, municipal, infrastructure and rural-development cases. Participants work with tenure maps, stakeholder analyses, policy problem statements, legal and institutional assessments, implementation plans and monitoring indicators. Across the course, each participant develops a land policy reform package for a real or realistic jurisdiction, municipality, programme or project area. The final package includes a policy rationale, proposed measures, stakeholder strategy, delivery arrangements, risk controls and monitoring framework.

The course suits public officials, planners, land administrators, development practitioners and project professionals who influence land decisions or need to manage their consequences. It is relevant to national ministries, local governments, land commissions, housing agencies, infrastructure authorities, banks, NGOs and development-finance programmes.

What you will be able to do

  • Diagnose land governance weaknesses using the Land Governance Assessment Framework
  • Map statutory, customary and informal tenure arrangements for a defined territory
  • Formulate land policy objectives, principles and policy instruments
  • Assess institutional mandates, legal provisions and administrative delivery capacity
  • Design equitable land-use, public land and land-market policy measures
  • Prepare stakeholder engagement, consultation and grievance-management arrangements
  • Develop an implementation plan with sequencing, responsibilities, costs and indicators
  • Present a complete land policy reform package for senior review

Benefits of attending

For you

  • Produce credible land policy proposals grounded in tenure and governance evidence
  • Identify legal, institutional and political barriers before implementation begins
  • Handle customary, informal and registered rights within one policy analysis
  • Apply recognised land-governance frameworks in government and development assignments
  • Present land reform options clearly to senior officials and affected stakeholders

For your organisation

  • Better targeted land reforms based on diagnosed governance failures
  • Reduced delays and disputes in housing, infrastructure and rural-development programmes
  • Clearer institutional responsibilities for land allocation, registration and enforcement
  • Stronger protection of legitimate tenure rights and vulnerable groups
  • Practical implementation plans with measurable progress indicators and risk controls

Course modules

18 modules over 10 days

Participants can frame a land policy problem in terms of public purpose, rights and governance failures.

  • Land policy objectives: equity, efficiency, sustainability, security and public revenue
  • Distinguishing land policy, land law, land administration and land-use planning
  • Public, private, communal and customary land categories compared
  • Governance failures affecting access, allocation, registration and enforcement
  • Rights holders, duty bearers and accountability relationships mapped
  • Policy trade-offs between development, protection, affordability and fiscal objectives

Participants can analyse the tenure arrangements and rights bundles affecting a defined area.

  • Bundle of rights: access, use, control, transfer and exclusion
  • Freehold, leasehold, occupancy, customary and informal tenure arrangements
  • De facto and de jure rights assessed separately
  • Secondary rights, seasonal access and overlapping claims identified
  • Women’s land rights examined through household and community tenure structures
  • Tenure security indicators matched to urban and rural contexts

Participants can conduct a structured diagnosis of land governance strengths, gaps and risks.

  • Land Governance Assessment Framework dimensions and assessment questions
  • Evidence matrix built from laws, records, interviews and service data
  • Scoring tenure recognition, land-use planning and public land management
  • Institutional integrity assessed through transparency, appeals and audit arrangements
  • Diagnostic findings prioritised using severity, urgency and feasibility criteria
  • Problem tree separates root causes from visible land governance symptoms

Participants can assess whether legal rules and institutional mandates support policy objectives.

  • Constitutional property protections and public-interest limitations reviewed
  • Land law hierarchy: constitutions, statutes, regulations, directives and local bylaws
  • Mandate mapping identifies overlaps among ministries, municipalities and land agencies
  • Administrative law requirements for notice, reasons, appeals and procedural fairness
  • Delegated powers assessed against staff capability and budget authority
  • Legal gap analysis links policy proposals to required amendments

Participants can specify the evidence base needed for a defensible land policy decision.

  • Land information inventory covers parcels, rights holders, values and restrictions
  • Cadastre, registry, valuation roll and planning records compared
  • Disaggregated data identifies gender, poverty, disability and displacement impacts
  • Satellite imagery and field verification used to test settlement patterns
  • Data quality assessed for completeness, accuracy, currency and accessibility
  • Privacy, consent and access controls applied to landholder information

Participants can design a participation process suited to contested land policy decisions.

  • Stakeholder mapping identifies rights holders, claimants, authorities and intermediaries
  • Power-interest grid distinguishes influence, exposure and likely positions
  • Consultation objectives set before selecting meetings, surveys or community forums
  • Free, prior and informed consent principles considered for indigenous peoples
  • Participation plan addresses language, accessibility, timing and representation barriers
  • Feedback registers document responses, commitments and unresolved concerns

Participants can formulate policy responses to urban growth, informality and housing land constraints.

  • Urban land supply assessed through serviced land, density and infrastructure capacity
  • Informal settlement upgrading options compared with eviction and relocation
  • Inclusionary zoning, land readjustment and land banking assessed
  • Development control links zoning compliance to permits and enforcement
  • Affordable housing land requirements estimated from household and market data
  • Regularisation pathways address occupancy, infrastructure, finance and legal recognition

Participants can address rural tenure, agricultural land use and resource-access issues in policy design.

  • Customary authorities and community institutions assessed for legitimate representation
  • Agricultural land fragmentation measured through holding size and parcel distribution
  • Pastoral corridors, commons and seasonal resource rights protected
  • Land consolidation options tested against equity and livelihood effects
  • Forestry, water and mineral rights coordinated with land tenure
  • Community land registration procedures designed around locally recognised boundaries

Participants can assess land-market instruments and fiscal measures for policy use.

  • Land market diagnosis examines supply constraints, prices, transactions and speculation
  • Comparable sales, income and cost approaches to valuation distinguished
  • Mass appraisal models support property-tax base development
  • Betterment levies capture infrastructure-related increases in land value
  • Vacant land taxes and holding charges assessed for behavioural effects
  • Transaction cost analysis identifies barriers to formal land-market participation

Participants can develop accountable procedures for public land inventory, allocation and disposal.

  • Public land inventory classifies ownership, occupancy, use and encumbrances
  • Asset registers reconciled with cadastral maps and agency records
  • Allocation criteria distinguish public purpose, social need and commercial use
  • Competitive tender, lease and concession methods compared for transparency
  • Disposal decisions tested against valuation, approvals and public disclosure requirements
  • Audit trails record decisions, beneficiaries, payments and contractual obligations

Participants can plan lawful acquisition and resettlement processes that protect affected people.

  • Public-purpose tests and necessity assessments documented before acquisition decisions
  • Census and asset inventory establish affected persons and entitlements
  • Replacement cost principles distinguished from market-value compensation approaches
  • Resettlement Action Plan components: eligibility, livelihoods, housing and monitoring
  • Cut-off dates, disclosure and grievance procedures communicated clearly
  • Livelihood restoration measures tracked beyond physical relocation completion

Participants can design proportionate mechanisms for preventing and resolving land disputes.

  • Dispute typology separates boundary, inheritance, allocation, compensation and eviction cases
  • Grievance redress mechanism stages define intake, assessment, response and appeal
  • Mediation, arbitration, adjudication and litigation compared by dispute type
  • Case registers capture parties, claims, evidence, decisions and elapsed time
  • Customary dispute resolution assessed against equality and due-process safeguards
  • Early-warning indicators identify escalating disputes around planned land interventions

Participants can write policy options that link diagnosed problems to feasible instruments.

  • Policy problem statement specifies affected groups, causes and consequences
  • Theory of change links interventions to intended tenure outcomes
  • Regulatory, fiscal, institutional and information instruments compared
  • Option appraisal assesses effectiveness, equity, cost, legality and political feasibility
  • Policy principles translate public values into decision criteria
  • Draft policy provisions define scope, responsibilities, safeguards and review periods

Participants can integrate equity and safeguard requirements into land policy and delivery arrangements.

  • Gender analysis identifies barriers to ownership, inheritance and registration
  • Vulnerable groups defined through exposure, exclusion and dependency factors
  • Human rights impact assessment screens policy measures for adverse effects
  • Non-discrimination safeguards incorporated into eligibility and allocation rules
  • Safeguard indicators track participation, compensation and tenure outcomes
  • Accessible complaints channels designed for marginalised rights holders

Participants can convert policy commitments into sequenced implementation plans with accountable ownership.

  • Implementation roadmap sequences legal reform, systems change and service delivery
  • RACI matrix assigns responsible, accountable, consulted and informed parties
  • Costed action plan identifies recurrent, capital and transition expenditures
  • Capacity assessment covers staffing, skills, equipment and operating procedures
  • Change management plan addresses resistance, incentives and communications
  • Interagency coordination protocol sets decisions, escalation routes and meeting cycles

Participants can build a monitoring framework that supports implementation control and policy revision.

  • Results framework connects inputs, outputs, outcomes and longer-term impacts
  • SMART indicators measure tenure security, service quality and dispute resolution
  • Baseline plan defines sources, disaggregation, frequency and data ownership
  • Monitoring dashboard combines delivery milestones, risks and beneficiary feedback
  • Evaluation questions test relevance, effectiveness, equity and sustainability
  • Policy review triggers identify when evidence requires adjustment or repeal

Participants can identify funding, procurement and financial-control requirements for land reform programmes.

  • Programme budget links activities, unit costs, funding sources and contingencies
  • Capital and recurrent costs separated for sustainable service planning
  • Procurement strategy covers surveying, valuation, systems and community facilitation
  • Terms of reference specify outputs, quality controls and reporting requirements
  • Financial controls address beneficiary payments, compensation and land transactions
  • Donor financing conditions aligned with national budget and accountability systems

Participants can build, review and present a complete land policy reform package for a defined jurisdiction or programme area.

  • Policy diagnosis synthesises tenure, institutional, market and stakeholder evidence
  • Reform objective and theory of change stated with measurable outcomes
  • Policy instruments selected using option-appraisal criteria and implementation constraints
  • Stakeholder engagement, safeguards and grievance arrangements incorporated into design
  • Costed implementation roadmap assigns actions, owners, milestones and risks
  • Monitoring framework specifies indicators, baselines, reporting and review triggers
  • Peer review tests coherence, legality, equity and delivery feasibility
  • Senior briefing presentation communicates recommendations, trade-offs and required decisions

Exercises and examples are adapted to each cohort's sectors and roles.

What you take back to work

  1. Land governance diagnostic template
  2. Tenure and stakeholder mapping workbook
  3. Land policy options appraisal matrix
  4. Public land allocation checklist
  5. Costed implementation roadmap template
  6. Land policy monitoring framework

Who should attend

  • Land policy officers — formulate or revise national, regional or municipal land policies
  • Urban planners — connect land-use plans with tenure, markets and implementation controls
  • Land administration managers — improve cadastral, registration and public-land services
  • Rural development officials — address customary tenure, agricultural land and community rights
  • Infrastructure project managers — manage acquisition, resettlement and land-related project risks
  • NGO and development programme staff — support rights-based land governance reforms

Skills and tools covered

Land policy formulationTenure systems analysisLand governance assessmentStakeholder engagement planningImplementation designLand dispute management

Tools and standards

Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure, Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration, Land Governance Assessment Framework, Social Tenure Domain Model

How the course runs

Training methodology

The course uses short instructor briefings, facilitated case analysis, group exercises, policy simulations and structured application planning. Cases examine municipal expansion, customary land administration, public land allocation, agricultural investment and infrastructure acquisition. Participants assess evidence, compare policy choices, test institutional arrangements and prepare documents used in reform programmes. Trainers provide feedback against stated criteria throughout both weeks. Time is reserved for participants to apply each framework to a jurisdiction, programme or project area relevant to their work.

Requirements and prerequisites

Participants should have practical exposure to public administration, urban planning, rural development, land administration, housing, infrastructure delivery or community development. They should be able to read policy documents, discuss institutional responsibilities and work with basic maps, tables and consultation records. Familiarity with local land laws or planning regulations is useful but not essential. The course does not require a law degree, surveying qualification, GIS expertise, advanced economics or prior experience with cadastral systems. Participants are encouraged to bring a current land policy issue, programme or project context.

A typical training day

08:30 – 10:30First session
10:30 – 10:45Refreshment break
10:45 – 12:30Second session
12:30 – 13:30Lunch and networking
13:30 – 15:00Third session
15:00 – 15:15Refreshment break
15:15 – 16:30Workshop and daily review

Live online deliveries follow the same structure in East Africa Time, with shorter screen blocks and longer breaks.

What the fee includes

  • Instruction by a practitioner facilitator
  • Full course workbook and materials
  • Exercise files, templates and case studies
  • Refreshments and lunch on classroom deliveries
  • Certificate of completion
  • Post-course application plan

Frequently asked questions

You should have some exposure to public administration, planning, land administration, rural development, housing or infrastructure work. A legal, surveying or GIS qualification is not required.

Bring a current land policy challenge, project concept, planning issue or reform proposal if you have one. Useful materials include relevant laws, policy papers, maps, service data or stakeholder records, but these are optional.

The course is designed for officials and practitioners whose work affects land rights, land allocation, planning, registration, public land, housing, rural development or acquisition. It also suits NGO and development programme staff supporting government reform.

This course focuses on policy choices, governance arrangements, tenure rights, institutional responsibilities and implementation management. It uses land information and cadastral concepts, but does not train participants in technical surveying, GIS operation or cadastral drafting.

Participants can use the diagnostic, stakeholder map, policy appraisal matrix and implementation roadmap to structure active reform work. The capstone package can be adapted as a briefing document, concept note or policy-development plan.

The first week establishes tenure, governance, legal, data and stakeholder foundations, then applies them to urban and rural policy issues. The second week focuses on instruments, acquisition, implementation, monitoring, financing and the final reform-package presentation; each training day runs from 08:30 to 16:30 with about 6.5 contact hours.

Questions about this course?

Ask about dates, fees, group bookings or running it for your team. Our training team replies by email.